Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 196-202.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2019.03.023

Previous Articles    

Discussion on Classification Standard of Eco-environment Quality in Counties of National Key Eco-functional Areas

SU Lei1, LI Junying2*   

  1. 1.College of Art and Design, Zhongshan Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zhongshan Guangdong 528402, China;
    2.College of Forestry, Shenyang Agricultural Uinversity, Shenyang Liaoning 110866, China
  • Published:2019-07-12

Abstract: By using the method of intelligent clustering analysis and fast clustering analysis, and considering the two variables of natural ecological index and environmental status index value, the ecological environment quality assessment results of water conservation types in national key eco-functional areas in China in 2016 were classified and compared with the results of current index system and classification standards. In contrast, the classification standard of ecological environment quality in national key eco-functional areas was discussed. Comparing results with the current classification standard, the present classification standard has more advantages, and can directly and detailedly reflect the natural ecological status and environmental quality of counties in the water conservation function area. In conclusion, the classification standard of ecological environment quality should not be completely confined to a fixed level and numerical value, and the method of intelligent clustering and fast clustering can be used as a supplement to the current classification standard.

Key words: cluster analysis;intelligent clustering, fast clustering, national key eco-functional areas, eco-environmental quality assessment, classification standard

CLC Number: 

  • X8
[1] DOU X, LI S, WANG J. Ecological strategy of city sustainable development[J]. Apcbee Procedia, 2013, 5: 429-434.
[2] ZOU H, DUAN X, YE L, et al. Locating sustainability issues: identification of ecological vulnerability in mainland China’s mega-regions[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(7): 1179.
[3] 罗毅, 陈斌. 深入推进国家重点生态功能区县域生态环境质量监测评价与考核工作[J]. 环境保护, 2014, 42(12): 10-13.
[4] 朱国华. 我国环境治理中的政府环境责任研究[D]. 南昌:南昌大学, 2016.
[5] 杨保华, 杨清华, 陈剑虹. 关于《生态环境状况评价技术规范(试行)》中土地退化指数的权重及计算方法的探讨[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2011(3): 103-107.
[6] 问青春. 《生态环境状况评价技术规范》修订及对生态评价工作的影响[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 2016(10): 69-71.
[7] 叶有华, 梁永贤, 沈一青, 等. 《生态环境状况评价技术规范(试行)》中若干值得商榷的问题[J]. 热带地理, 2009, 29(4): 100-102.
[8] 中国环境监测总站. 生态环境状况评价技术规范(试行) [S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2006.
[9] 王德青, 朱建平, 刘晓葳, 等. 函数型数据聚类分析研究综述与展望[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2018(1): 51-63.
[10]韩微, 翟盘茂. 三种聚类分析方法在中国温度区划分中的应用研究[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2015, 20(1): 111-118.
[11]奥布力·塔力普, 汪慧玲, 阿里木江·卡斯木,等. 基于系统聚类分析的西部地区环境污染程度评价[J]. 冰川冻土, 2015, 37(1): 266-270.
[12]EVERITT B, HOTHORN T. Cluster Analysis[M]. Chichester:Wiley, 2011: 115-136.
[13]吕卫平, 张晓梅. 基于SPSS的聚类分析应用[J]. 福建电脑, 2013, 29(9): 20-23.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!