Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (3): 10-19.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2024.03.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Theoretical Interpretation of the Proposition that Capital Creates Culture

FU Wen-jun   

  1. School of Marxism, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • Received:2024-03-01 Online:2024-05-25 Published:2024-05-17

Abstract: Although Marx's discourse on culture is not very extensive, it has had a pivotal influence on the history of cultural criticism. In the context of historical materialism, Marx not only accurately reveals the realistic foundation, practical core and generative characteristics of culture, but also scientifically demonstrates the dialectical structure, behind the cultural category, of material and idea, dynamic and static states. In criticizing political economy, Marx creatively proposes the proposition that “capital creates culture”. In the era of capitalism, capital, according to its own features and requirements for proliferation, has created a corresponding culture. Such is essentially a proliferation-oriented or profit-making culture, which is manifested in the basic types of materialistic secular culture, homogenized mechanical culture, individual self-interested utilitarian culture, and formalistic hypocritical culture. Such a proposition is a theoretical identification of the dominant role of capital in the process of cultural creation and the social fact that culture is subordinate to capital. Marx's analysis on it is actually a cultural critique of the social and historical development. Marx's interpretation of culture has had a lasting and profound impact on the process of world civilization, and bears great enlightening significance for promoting the construction of socialist culture and the new form of human civilization in the new era.

Key words: Das Kapital and its Manuscript, cultural criticism, capital logic, social history

CLC Number:  G02
[1] 弗雷德·英格利斯.文化[M].韩启群,等译.南京:南京大学出版社,2008.
[2] 仰海峰.文化哲学视野中的文化概念——兼论西方马克思主义的文化批判理论[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2017(1):11-18,157-158.
[3] 丹尼尔·贝尔.资本主义文化矛盾[M].严蓓雯,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2012.
[4] 何萍.马克思主义哲学与文化哲学[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2002.
[5] 卢文忠.马克思主义文化理论:一种批判性的研究[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2020.
[6] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[7] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[8] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[9] 孟宪平.马克思主义文化动力思想及其实践研究[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2018.
[10] 刘同舫.当代中国马克思主义的哲学境界[J].中国社会科学,2021(9):4-25,204.
[11] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第31卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1998.
[12] 林剑.文化哲学问题研究的问题之思[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011(4):55-62.
[13] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[14] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第32卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1998.
[15] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第5卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[16] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第8卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[17] 胡潇.论资本逻辑与文化逻辑的价值冲突[J].江海学刊,2014(4):52-58.
[18] 付文军.《资本论》的意识形态批判及其辩证张力[J].马克思主义研究,2021(9):110-118.
[19] 卢卡奇.历史与阶级意识——关于马克思主义辩证法的研究[M].杜章智,等译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[20] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第6卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[21] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第7卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[22] 刘同舫.人类解放何以可能:马克思解放事业的当代阐释[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2024.
[23] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第10卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[24] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政(第2卷)[M].北京:外文出版社,2017.
[25] 习近平.坚定文化自信,建设社会主义文化强国[J].求是,2019(12):4-12.
[26] 习近平.在纪念毛泽东同志诞辰130周年座谈会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2023-12-27(2).
[27] 习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M].北京:人民出版社,2022.
[28] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政(第4卷)[M].北京:外文出版社,2022.
[29] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政(第3卷)[M].北京:外文出版社,2020.
[30] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政(第1卷)[M].北京:外文出版社,2018.
[31] 习近平.在文化传承发展座谈会上的讲话[J].求是,2023(17):4-12.
[32] 习近平.开辟马克思主义中国化时代化新境界[J].求是,2023(20):4-11.
[1] WANG Wei-hua. A Philosophical Review of Three Approaches to Transcending Capital Logic [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(5): 42-52.
[2] WANG Sheng-yu. On the “Capital Logic” of Marx’s Dimension of Human Science [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(6): 30-34.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!