Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (4): 122-137.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2026.04.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Resource Misallocation or Cognitive Bias: A Study on the Impact of Climate Risk on Corporate Green Total Factor Productivity

QIU Yu-zhuo, CHAO Yu, ZHANG San-feng   

  1. School of Business, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
  • Received:2026-03-12 Online:2026-07-05 Published:2026-07-01

Abstract: Against the backdrop of intensifying global climate change, climate risk has emerged as a critical factor constraining corporate green transition. Using panel data from A-share listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges spanning 2013-2022, this paper empirically examines the impact of climate risk on corporate green total factor productivity (GTFP) and its underlying mechanisms. The findings indicate that climate risk significantly inhibits the improvement of corporate GTFP, a conclusion that remains robust after addressing endogeneity concerns through instrumental variable estimation and a battery of robustness checks. Mechanism analysis reveals that climate risk not only undermines corporate green governance performance, but also induces managerial myopia, thereby dragging down the long-term performance of GTFP. Heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that this inhibiting effect is more pronounced in firms with higher supply chain concentration, those in the growth stage, and those with higher chairperson ownership. Further analysis finds that digital transformation and improvements in investment efficiency can effectively mitigate the adverse impact of climate risk. Decomposition analysis based on the Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index reveals that this mitigating effect operates primarily through the channel of green technological progress rather than mere improvements in technical efficiency, exhibiting a pronounced “technology-biased” characteristic. To guard against climate risk, enterprises should accelerate digital deployment and optimize investment structures, while regulatory authorities need to formulate targeted climate governance and support policies for vulnerable enterprises to ensure the green and sustainable development of micro-entities.

Key words: climate risk, green total factor productivity, managerial myopia, technological bias

CLC Number:  F272.5; F205
[1] CHENG Hong-wei, LUO Huan. The Impact of Carbon Commitment Compliance on the Cost of Equity Capital: A Risk Signaling Perspective [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(4): 105-121.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] ZHAO Hui-chen, WANG Ying, LI Lin, XUE Qian. Research on K-12 Students’ Technology and Engineering Literacy and Its Cultivation: Promoting the Development of Interdisciplinary Innovative Talents[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(2): 79 -90 .
[2] NIU Xian-feng. Three Sets of Relationships in the Research and Exposition of the Systematization and Scientification of the Party’s Innovative Theories[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(4): 1 -8 .
[3] CHEN Xue-ming, TIAN Kun. The Distinctions between Chinese Modernization and Western Modernization from the Perspective of Philosophical Foundations[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(4): 9 -18 .
[4] YAN Yan, ZHENG Ya-lan. The New Alienation in the Era of Digital Capitalism and Its Essence—A Review of Fuchs’ Critical Theory of Technological Alienation[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(4): 19 -27 .
[5] HUANG Shi-song, HU Qing. Multidimensional Impacts of the New Trends in Population Aging on Common Prosperity and Policy Optimization[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(4): 28 -39 .
[6] REN Liang-liang, HE Xue-feng. “Living in the Original Family”: Typified Practices for Rural Companionship-based Elderly Care and Its Reproduction Mechanism[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(4): 40 -51 .
[7] DU Xiao-zhen, ZHANG Xin. Embodied Intelligent Robots Empowering Elderly Care Services: Mechanisms, Practical Obstacles, and Development Pathways[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(4): 52 -63 .
[8] ZUO Mei-yun, YANG Yan-min, DU Fei-yuan, SUN Shi-wei. Research on Smart Elderly Care Data Resource Standards: Framework Design and Development Recommendations[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(4): 64 -75 .
[9] QU Man-qi, LI Bao-min. The Technology Ecosystem of Multimodal Classroom Video Analysis: Analytical Elements, Potential Space, and Risk Mitigation[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(4): 76 -86 .
[10] HONG Yu-xiang, ZHAO Jia-qing. How Can the Supply and Demand of Regional Cybersecurity Talent Be Matched? —A Study Based on the Grounded Theory[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(4): 87 -96 .