Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2015, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 1-8.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2015.05.001

    Next Articles

A Comparison between the Myth of Flood Survivors in Mo Scripture of the Zhuang and the Bible and Its Cognitive Value

PAN Qi-xu   

  1. Research Center of the Zhuang Study, Academy of Guangxi Social Science, Nanning 530022, China
  • Online:2015-09-10 Published:2018-12-19

Abstract: There are obvious identity and parallelism existing in the myth structures, thinking modes and theme concepts between The Mo Scripture of the Zhuang and the Bible. Through the research methods of case study and integrative analysis, we compared them with each other from a new perspective, which help us to understand the historical cultural connotation and cognitive value of the worldwide myths of “the floods destroying the world and human’s rebirth.” It is the same development phases and basic needs in human being’s history that made the similarity in the mode of flood myths; the flood myths reflects the historical evolution of human being’s social marriage system; the cosmology that the flood myths express is the drainage divide between the civilization era and barbarism era of human beings.

Key words: the Mo Scripture of the Zhuang, Cucurbit Brother and Sister, the Bible, Noah’s Ark, flood myth

CLC Number: 

  • C951
[1] E.克洛特.人类幼稚时代[M].北平:商务印书馆,1932.
[2] 张声震.壮族麽经布洛陀影印译注[M].南宁:广西民族出版社,2004.
[3] 张声震.布洛陀经诗:第二篇[M].南宁:广西民族出版社,1989。
[4] 韩家权,潘其旭,等.布洛陀史诗[M].南宁:广西人民出版社,2012.
[5] 农冠品,曹廷伟.壮族民间故事选:第1集[M].南宁:广西人民出版社,1982.
[6] 摩尔根.古代社会:第3册[M],杨东莼,等译.北京:商务印书馆,1971.
[7] 恩格斯.家庭、私有制和国家的起源[M]//马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集:第4卷.北京:人民出版社,1972.
[8] 农冠品.中国歌谣集成·广西卷·壮族婚源歌(上)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1992.
[9] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集资料汇编:第九卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2011.
[10] 普列汉诺夫.普列汉诺夫哲学著作选:第3卷[M].北京生活·读书·新知三联书店,1984.
[11] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第12卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1962.
[1] HUANG Long-guang. Ecological Narrative on Genesis and Destruction Motifs of Yi People’s Water Myths [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(6): 104-110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .