Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (4): 99-104.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2017.04.016

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Priority Processing Caching Effect of Event-based Prospective Memory

WEI Yi-ping1,2, PANG Hui-zhi1,2, PEI Na1,2, LIU Yong-hua1,2, HAN Ying1,2, ZHAO Shuai1,2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Education, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004;
    2.Key Laboratory of Guangxi Universities of Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, Guilin 541004, China
  • Received:2017-04-14 Online:2017-07-20 Published:2018-07-14

Abstract: Adopting dual task paradigms combined with eye tracking technology, this study explored the effect of cue type and reward on event-based prospective memory. The results are as follows: 1.The main effect of cue type of prospective memory performance is significant, and the best is under the conditions of parallel and precondition; 2. Reward can improve the awareness rate of prospective cues, and also can inhibit them, but can not significantly effect that of prospective cues when they were postposition and target; 3. The eye fixation time of prospective cue under condition of post target was significantly less than that of post non-target. These results suggest that there may exist a priority processing caching mechanism in working memory, which saves the prospective cue information, the central executive system may rapidly be active the caching mechanism at the beginning of each new task, and decide whether to start the prospective task model, the activation probability of priority processing caching may be enhanced due to reward and repeated stimulation factors. After activation, the caching may independently process prospective memory information using processing channel which is different from non-prospective task.

Key words: event-based prospective memory, cue type, reward, eye tracking, priority processing effect

CLC Number: 

  • B842.3
[1] Brandimonte M A, Einstein G O, McDaniel M A. Prospective Memory: Theory and Applications[M]. Erlbaum: Mahwah,NJ,1996.
[2] McDaniel M A, Einstein G O. Prospective memory: an overview and synthesis of an emerging field[M]:3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 2007:78- 79.
[3] McDaniel M A,Einstein G O. The neuropsychology of prospective memory in normal aging: A componential approach[J]. Neuropsychologia,2011,49(8):2147-2155.
[4] Einstein G O, McDaniel M A. Normal aging and prospective Memory Journal of Experimental Psychology[J]. Learning, Memory and Cognition,1990, 16:717 -726.
[5] 李寿欣,丁兆叶,张利增.认知方式与线索特征对前瞻记忆的影响[J].心理学报,2005, 37(3):320-327.
[6] 胡彬,冯成志.前瞻记忆类型差异及动机与任务序列对前瞻记忆的影响[J].心理学报,2013, 45(9):944-960
[7] Duzel E, Bunzeck N, Guitart-Masip M, Duzel S. Noveltyrelated motivation of anticipation and exploration by dopamine(NOMAD):Implications for healthy aging[J]. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2010,34: 660–669.
[8] 王丽娟,田翠,武侠.前瞻记忆的神经机制:来自临床研究的证据[J].心理科学,2013, 36(5):1267-1272.
[9] 陈思佚,周仁来.前瞻记忆需要经过策略加工:来自眼动的证据[J].心理学报,2010,42(12):1128-1136.
[10] Smith R E. The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology[J]. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2003,29: 347-361.
[11] Shallice T, Burgess P W.Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man[J]. Brain,1991,114:727-741.
[12] Brandimonte M A, Passolunghi M C. The effect of cue familiarity, cue distinctiveness and retention interval on prospective remembering[J].The QuarterlyJournal of Experimental Psychology, 1994,47:565-588.
[13] 范玲霞,齐森青,郭仁露,黄博,杨东.奖励影响注意选择的认知加工机制[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(10):1573-1584.
[1] ZHANG Kun, GAO Lei, YUAN Yi-shuang, PENG Shi-xin, XU Ru-yi. Visual Attention Characteristics of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder to Cartoon and Real Dynamic Social Situations [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(3): 120-127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 1(1): 1 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 0, (): 1 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .