Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (2): 17-27.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2021.02.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Study on Document Politics from the Perspective of Political Mobilization ——A Study on the Way of Governance of the Communist Party of China

Wang Huai-yue   

  1. Institute of Contemporary China Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100009, China
  • Received:2020-12-15 Published:2021-03-29

Abstract: Document politics is a kind of governance mode of the Communist Party of China, within the framework of the Constitution and law, taking political documents as the core to grasp the direction of national development, implementing the requirements of political documents with specific documents, and turning the document that can stand the test of practice into law. As for its operation, the core embodiment lies in its formation and implementation of political documents. This paper, on the basis of discussing the applicability of political mobilization analysis, taking the report of the National Congress of the Communist Party of China as an example, analyzes the operation of documentary politics by employing the interpretation model of “issue building-identity polymerization”, regards the formation of political documents as the process of “issue building”, mainly including the stages of creation, formation, modification and completion, and takes the implementation of political documents as the process of “identity polymerization” specifically manifested as the realization of the functions of ruling, conversion, and mobilization. Document politics, though bearing reasonability and necessity, i.e. it not only offers a guide to national development, but also imposes the discipline of party power and the restraint of individual will, has certain limitations. In view of this, we still need, in the future, on the one hand, to use political documents to “steer” the country’s development within the framework of the Constitution and law, and on the other hand, to reduce the quantity and improve the quality, of documents, thus providing the Chinese model and Chinese solution for world development.

Key words: political mobilization, topic building, identity polymerization, political documents, document politics, governance of the country, China’s path

CLC Number: 

  • D220
[1] Guoguang Wu. Documentary politics: hypotheses, process, and case studies//Carol L. Hamrin and Suisheng Zhao,Decision-making in Deng’s china[M].M. E. Sharpe, Inc.,1995,P24-28.
[2] 北京大学国家发展研究院.公意的边界[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2013: 132—155.
[3] 孔繁斌.政治动员的行动逻辑——一个概念模型及其应用[J].江苏行政学院学报,2006(5):79-84.
[4] 谢岳.文件制度:政治沟通的过程与功能[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(6):15-23.
[5] 潘同人.中国文件机制初探[J].理论导报,2011(1):39-42.
[6] 周振华.文件学概论[M].兰州:甘肃人民出版社,2002:6.
[7] 刘河庆.文件治理中的政策采纳及其影响因素研究:基于国家和省级政府政策文本(2008—2018)数据[J].社会,2020,40(4):217-240.
[8] 李英.“文件政治”与中层党政干部人才标准的偏离及矫正[J].领导科学,2016(15):41-43.
[9] 周庆智.“文件治理”:作为基层秩序的规范来源和权威形式[J].求实,2017(11):35-44.
[10] 施从美.当代中国文件制度的结构与功能解析[J].江海学刊,2010(1):130-135.
[11] 谢岳.当代中国政治沟通[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2006:91-116.
[12] 施从美,陈小琴.“文件政治”研究的方法初探[J].云南行政学院学报,2008(4):43-46.
[13] 施从美.当代中国文件治理变迁与现代国家成长——以建国以来中央颁发的土地文件为分析视角[J].江苏社会科学,2010(1):97-104.
[14] 张学博.文件治国的历史观察:1982—2017[J].学术界,2017(9):224-231.
[15] 杨小明.新中国成立以来中国共产党的政治动员研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2014:217-251.
[16] 寇震.文件制度视角下省级政府政策性公文处理研究——以S省为例[D].济南:山东大学,2017.
[17] 李林倬.基层政府的文件治理——以县级政府为例[J].社会学研究,2013,28(4):101-128+244.
[18] 罗大蒙,任中平.中国乡镇基层政权中的文件政治:象征、效能与根源——G乡的表达[J].学习论坛,2015,31(9):45-49.
[1] SHAO Tian-song. A Research on the Official Document Terms of Chinese Society of
the Song Dynasty Unearthed in Heishui City
[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(4): 1-10.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .