Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (6): 98-105.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2024.06.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

How Can Assessment Promote Deep Learning?

ZENG Wen-jie   

  1. School of Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
  • Received:2023-08-02 Online:2024-11-25 Published:2024-11-14

Abstract: Four types of deep learning have been developed in school education, namely “deep learning that goes beyond surface learning”, “deep learning that covers multiple dimensions”, “deep learning that cultivates core competencies”, and “deep learning that targets to knowledge-creation”. The common assessment approaches available in China suffer from headaches in promoting deep learning, mainly told by the troubles in assessing implicit indicators and promoting learning through assessment. To improve assessment for promoting students’ deep learning, it is needed to reflect the examination doctrine to emphasize daily assessment and reflect “monologue-type assessment” to reinforce “dialogue-type assessment”. As the “test-oriented culture” is still available in China to some extent, the correlation between implicit and explicit indicators emphasized by deep learning should be particularly highlighted. At the same time, it is necessary to enhance teachers’ assessment literacy for deep learning, enrich their knowledge about assessment, continuously optimize their conceptions of assessment, so as to realize and reconstruct the identity of teachers as assessors for deep learning.

Key words: deep learning, promoting learning through assessment, assessment literacy, assessment reform, test-oriented culture

CLC Number:  G40-058.1
[1] Marton F, Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning: I-outcome and process [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976(1): 4-11.
[2] Entwistle N J, Ramsden P. Understanding student learning[M]. London & Canberra: Croom Helm, 1983.
[3] 吴永军.关于深度学习的再认识[J].课程·教材·教法,2019(2):51-58,36.
[4] American Institutes for Research. Evidence of deeper learning outcomes[R]. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, 2014.
[5] 陈静静.学习共同体:走向深度学习[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2020.
[6] 刘月霞,郭华.深度学习:走向核心素养[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2018.
[7] [加]迈克尔·富兰,[美]玛丽亚·兰沃希.极富空间:新教育学如何实现深度学习[M].于佳琪,黄雪锋,译.重庆:西南师范大学出版社,2016.
[8] Marton F, Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning-II outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task[J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976(2):115-127.
[9] Boud D, Falchikov N. Rethinking assessment in higher education[M]. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2007.
[10] 李本友,李红恩,余宏亮.学生学习方式转变的影响因素、途径与发展趋势[J].教育研究,2012(2):122-128.
[11] 戴歆紫,王祖浩.国外深度学习的分析视角及评价方法[J].外国教育研究,2017(10):45-58.
[12] Gravett S, Petersen N. Structuring dialogue with students via learning tasks[J]. Innovative Higher Education, 2002(4):281-291.
[13] [美]莫妮卡·R.马丁内斯,[美]丹尼斯·麦格拉思.深度学习:批判性思维与自主性探究式学习[M].唐奇,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2019.
[14] 岳欣云,董宏建.论小学生数学隐性学力的提升[J].课程·教材·教法,2016(10):63-68.
[15] Xu Y, Brown G T L. Teacher assessment literacy in practice: a reconceptualization[J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2016(1):149-162.
[1] WANG Meng-ke, WANG Zhuo, CHEN Zeng-zhao. Deep Learning Evaluation: Theoretical Models, Related Technologies and Practical Cases [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(6): 66-75.
[2] XU Feng-hua, YU Le. Pedagogical Research on Deep Learning: Origin, Connotation and Prospect [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 147-156.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!