Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (5): 118-129.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2025.05.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Reference and Reconstruction: International Experiences and Localized Practice Pathways of School-Family-Community Collaborative Education

ZHANG Jing-wei, ZHOU Meng-yuan   

  1. Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
  • Received:2024-04-10 Online:2025-09-05 Published:2025-09-18

Abstract: School-family-community collaborative education is a crucial chain in achieving Chinese-style educational modernization and high-quality educational development. International practical experiences can be broadly categorized into four types: the participation typology framework represented by the U.S. NNPS, the improved local participation typology framework 2.0 adopted by developed countries and regions such as Australia and Singapore, the parent involvement framework exemplified by the UK's home-school agreements and LSAs, and the organizational framework represented by Japan's PTA. The primary directions of school-family-community collaborative education in China can be summarized into five aspects: 1) to construct a “moral education network” through a collaborative system; 2) to implement a school governance approach of “management, operation, and evaluation”; 3) to establish and enhance a family education guidance service system with “parental responsibility” as the core; 4) to effectively develop a social resource allocation model that “integrates into community governance”; 5) to create a favorable educational public opinion environment through “exemplary cases”. The practice indicator system for high-quality school-family-community collaborative education in China, which embodies Chinese characteristics and global standards, consists of nine first-level indicators-conceptual synergy, role synergy, communication synergy, teaching synergy, management and decision-making synergy, family education synergy, resource synergy, collaborative environment, and evaluation synergy-along with 25 second-level indicators, including unified principles, role allocation, communication channels, learning guidance, management and decision-making systems, parental education training, resource integration, public opinion environment construction, and effectiveness evaluation.

Key words: school-family-community collaborative education, practice indicator system, Chinese-style school-family-community collaborative education policy, international experiences

CLC Number:  G36
[1] 中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议[N].人民日报,2020-11-04(1).
[2] 中共中央、国务院印发《中国教育现代化2035》[EB/OL].(2019-02-23)[2023-03-18].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-02/23/content_5367987.htm.
[3] 中共中央办公厅 国务院办公厅印发《关于进一步减轻义务教育阶段学生作业负担和校外培训负担的意见》[EB/OL].(2021-07-24)[2023-03-18].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-07/24/content_5627132.htm.
[4] 教育部等十三部门关于健全学校家庭社会协同育人机制的意见[EB/OL].(2023-01-17)[2023-03-18].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3325/202301/t20230119_1039746.html.
[5] 乔伊斯·L.爱泼斯坦,等.大教育:学校、家庭与社区合作体系[M].曹骏骥,译.哈尔滨:黑龙江教育出版社,2016.
[6] 黄河清.家校合作导论[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2008:53-54.
[7] 何瑞珠.家庭学校与社区协作:从理念研究到实践(增订版)[M].香港:香港中文大学出版社,2010.
[8] Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiment by nature and design[M]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1979:21-26.
[9] 张俊,吴重涵,王梅雾,等.面向实践的家校合作指导理论——交叠影响域理论综述[J].教育学术月刊,2019(5):3-12.
[10] 吴重涵,王梅雾,张俊.家校合作:理论、经验与行动[M].南昌:江西教育出版社,2013.
[11] 卫沈丽.美国儿童养育的“学校化”——对“家长参与”政策的工具理性的评析[J].外国中小学教育,2017(5):29-35,28.
[12] Department of Education, Australian Government. Family-school partnerships framework[EB/OL].(2020-11-05)[2023-03-18].https://www.education.gov.au/supporting-family-school-community-partnerships-learning/family-school-partnerships/family-school-partnerships-framework.
[13] Australian Children's Education & Care Quality Authority. National quality standard[EB/OL].(2018-07)[2023-03-18].https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-07/RevisedNQSHandoutA4.pdf.
[14] Khong Y L, Ng P T. School-parent partnerships in Singapore[J]. Educational Research for Policy & Practice, 2005(1):1-11.
[15] Ministry of Education, Singapore. Schools, parents and the community to partner in bringing out the best in every student[EB/OL].(2015-09-22)[2023-03-18].https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/press-releases/20150922-schools-parents-and-the-community-to-partner-in-bringing-out-the-best-in-every-student.
[16] Ministry of Education, Singapore. Guidelines for school-home partnership: preparing students for the future[EB/OL].(2019-02-16)[2023-03-18].https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/press-releases/20190216-guidelines-for-school-home-partnership-preparing-students-for-the-future.
[17] Derek Gillard. Excellence in school[EB/OL].(2013-02-04)[2023-03-18].http://education-uk.org/documents/official-papers/1997-wp-excellence-in-schools.html.
[18] School standard and framework act 1998[EB/OL].(1998-07-24)[2023-03-18].http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/31/contents#opening Whole Mod.
[19] Deregulation act 2015[EB/OL].(2015-03-26)[2023-03-18].https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/20/contents.
[20] 王艳玲.英国家校合作的新形式——家长担任“教学助手”现象述评[J].比较教育研究,2004(7):52-57.
[21] 董丽丽,王全丽,陆程圆.英国学校让家长做“合伙人”[N].中国教育报,2021-09-23(10).
[22] Ofsted. Education inspection framework[EB/OL].(2021-02-22)[2023-03-18].https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/963625/Research_for_EIF_framework_updated_references_22_Feb_2021.pdf.
[23] 史景轩.日本PTA研究[D].石家庄:河北大学,2005.
[24] 杨民,苏丽萍.日本小学家校合作的研究及启示[J].教育科学,2013(6):89-93.
[25] 香港教育统筹委员会.第五号报告书[EB/OL].(1992-06)[2023-03-18].https://www.e-c.edu.hk/wp-content/uploads/1992/06/EC_Report_5_1992_C.pdf.
[26] 林惠真.家长参与活化了学校教育——台湾家长的任务与成果[J].基础教育学报,2001(2):32-36.
[27] 林宇.台湾地区小学家长会的组织、功能及启示[J].福建教育,2013(18):18-20.
[28] 梁丽婵,马海燕,张馨宇.我国中小学家校合作状况的十年变化及影响因素剖析[J].中国教育学刊,2020(12):51-57.
[29] 习近平.在会见第一届全国文明家庭代表时的讲话[N].人民日报,2016-12-16(2).
[30] 中国儿童发展纲要(2021-2030年)[EB/OL].(2021-09-27)[2023-03-18].https://www.nwccw.gov.cn/2021/09/27/99339693.html.
[31] 唐汉卫.学校立德树人的全面渗透:意蕴、实践与优化[J].中国电化教育,2020(10):1-6.
[32] 国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年)[EB/OL].(2010-07-29)[2023-03-18].http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2010-07/29/content_1667143.htm.
[33] 国务院关于印发国家教育事业发展“十三五”规划的通知[EB/OL].(2017-01-19)[2023-03-18].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-01/19/content_5161341.htm.
[34] 赵红霞.家校教育合作新模式的构建[J].教学与管理,2020(20):4-5.
[35] 教育部关于印发《国家教育事业发展第十二个五年规划》的通知[EB/OL].(2012-06-14)[2023-03-28].http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2012/content_2238967.htm.
[36] 全国家庭教育指导大纲(修订)[EB/OL].(2019-05-14)[2023-03-18].https://www.zgggw.gov.cn/zhengcefagui/gzzd/zgggw/13792.html.
[37] 蒲晓磊.家庭教育由“家事”上升为“国事”[N].法治日报,2021-10-25(8).
[38] 全国妇联、教育部等11部门印发《关于指导推进家庭教育的五年规划(2021-2025年)》[EB/OL].(2022-04-13)[2023-03-18].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-04/13/content_5684961.htm.
[39] 中华人民共和国家庭教育促进法[EB/OL].(2021-10-23)[2023-03-18].http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/202110/t20211023_314286.html.
[40] 教育部关于加强家庭教育工作的指导意见[EB/OL].(2015-10-16)[2023-03-18].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s7053/201510/t20151020_214366.html.
[41] 全国妇联,教育部,中央文明办,等.全国妇联 教育部 中央文明办 民政部 卫生部 国家人口计生委 中国关工委关于印发《关于指导推进家庭教育的五年规划(2011-2015年)》的通知[EB/OL].(2012-06-25)[2023-03-18].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1779/201206/t20120625_138245.html.
[42] 李建民,易凌云.新时代校外教育供给模式:本质属性、基本结构与优化路径[J].教育科学研究,2021(10):37-41.
[43] 教育部等九部门关于进一步推进社区教育发展的意见[EB/OL].(2016-07-08)[2023-03-18].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A07/zcs_cxsh/201607/t20160725_272872.html.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YE Lin, LU Wei. Bringing Relationships Back into Contracts: The Practical Logic of Sustainable Governance in Older Residential Communities—A Case Study of Trust-Based Property Management in Chengdu[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(4): 29 -39 .
[2] WANG Yu-chen. On the Cultural Dimension of Ecological Civilization Theory[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 1 -8 .
[3] KONG Ming-an. A New Exploration of the Issue of Capital Power from the Perspective of Bio-politics—With a Discussion on the New Alienation of Biopolitics in the Digital-Intelligence Era[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 9 -17 .
[4] KONG Wei-yu. Two ‘interruptions' in the writing of the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right—On Its Textual Relationship with the Kreuznach Notebooks[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 18 -28 .
[5] WU Ji-fei, YANG Shi-xin. Research on the Measurement and Spatial Differentiation of the Coordinated Development of “Two Civilizations” in Chinese Modernization[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 29 -40 .
[6] LONG Xue-gang, WANG Jian-hua. The History of Actors: Reflections on the Theory of Gradual Institutional Change[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 41 -51 .
[7] ZHANG Jiao, SUN Lai-bin. Lenin's Thoughts on the Cultural Construction of the Ruling Party and Their Contemporary Implications[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 52 -60 .
[8] LI Yan-ling, SHEN Wei-zhang. Research on Digital Empowerment of Agile Governance Transformation in Large Counties[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 61 -68 .
[9] ZHENG Zhi-feng, CHEN Jing. Definition of Subjects and Implementation Pathways for Generative AI Labeling Obligations[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 69 -78 .
[10] LIN Li, YU Jun-bo. Construction and Evaluation of Citizens' Digital Literacy Indicator System[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 79 -89 .