Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (5): 139-151.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2025.05.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Theoretical Analysis of the Development Relationship among the “Three Types of Enterprises”

LIU Rui   

  1. School of Applied Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
  • Received:2025-05-28 Online:2025-09-05 Published:2025-09-18

Abstract: State-owned enterprises (SOEs), private enterprises (PEs), and foreign-funded enterprises (FFEs) (collectively referred to as the “three types of enterprises”) have undergone dramatic fluctuations in the historical process of PRC. Currently, they have formed a layout with over 200,000 FFEs, more than 1 million SOEs, over 20 million PEs and other types of enterprises, serving respectively as the new force, main force, and auxiliary force of China's economy. Traditional socialist theory faces three dilemmas in interpreting the “three types of enterprises”: the realization of the idealized public economy, the inability to eliminate the private economy, and the organizational form of free labor associations. Although Hayek's neoliberal theory embraces rational elements of a market economy, it creates three myths that private enterprises are inherently more efficient than state-owned enterprises, that private enterprises bear an innovative spirit, and that mixed-ownership enterprises are economically unviable. The socialist enterprise economic theory with Chinese characteristics overcomes the theoretical limitations of the former and debunks the myths of the latter. To guide the healthy development of the “three types of enterprises”, their functions should be positioned based on the fundamental institutional attributes, their behaviors should be regulated according to market economy principles, their division of labor should be structured based on comparative advantages, their industrial systems should be formed with a focus on the security of industrial and supply chains, and tailored governance mechanisms should be established for each type of enterprise. Only by adhering to the socialist theory with Chinese characteristics can policy oscillations be avoided in guiding the development of the “three types of enterprises”.

Key words: socialist enterprise economic theory with Chinese characteristics, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), private enterprises (PEs), foreign-funded enterprises (FFEs), high-quality development

CLC Number:  F121.2
[1] 刘瑞.中国基本经济制度的自我完善——理解所有制的混合与国有经济“三力”[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2014(9):69-78.
[2] [俄] 普列汉诺夫,等.论空想社会主义(上卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1980.
[3] 恩格斯.反杜林论[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.北京:人民出版社,2015.
[4] 列宁.列宁论新经济政策[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.北京:人民出版社,2020.
[5] 叶书宗.勃列日涅夫的十八年[M].北京:人民出版社,2013.
[6] [美] 克里斯托弗·希尔顿. 五月花号[M].王聪,译.北京:华夏出版社,2006.
[7] 黄立茀,等.新经济政策时期的苏联社会[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2012.
[8] [匈] 亚诺什·科尔内.短缺经济学(下)[M].张晓光,李振宁,黄卫平,译.北京:经济科学出版社,1986.
[9] 上海国际问题研究所,柳光青,张显高,庄咏文.南斯拉夫的社会主义自治制度和经济发展[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1979.
[10] [南] 爱德华·卡德尔.南斯拉夫计划制度[M].北京:北京出版社,1979.
[11] [南] 米洛万·巴甫洛维奇.南斯拉夫自治经济制度的产生与发展[M].张修德,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1985.
[12] Lebowitz M. Build it now: socialism for the twenty-first century[EB/OL]. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1QK4y1U7GT/.
[13] [冰] 思拉恩·埃格特森.新制度经济学[M].吴经邦,等译.北京:商务印书馆,1996.
[14] [奥] 路德维希·冯·米塞斯.人类行为的经济学分析(下)[M].赵磊,李淑敏,黄丽丽,译.广州:广东经济出版社,2010.
[15] [俄] 鲍·布鲁兹库斯.苏维埃俄国的计划经济[M].李宏,王建民,译.济南:山东人民出版社,2018.
[16] [奥] 路德维希·冯·米塞斯.社会主义:经济学与社会学的分析[M].王建民,冯克利,崔树义,译.北京:商务印书馆,2018.
[17] [奥] 路德维希·冯·米塞斯.人类行为的经济学分析(上)[M].聂薇,裴艳丽,译.广州:广东经济出版社,2010.
[18] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政(第四卷)[M].北京:外文出版社,2022.
[19] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政(第二卷)[M].北京:外文出版社,2018.
[20] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政(第一卷)[M].北京:外文出版社,2018.
[21] 刘瑞,王岳.从“国进民退”之争看国企在宏观调控中的作用[J].政治经济学评论,2010(3):37-50.
[1] SHI Bing-zhan, XIONG Zhi. New Quality Productive Force, Digital Technology Innovation, and Product Quality Upgrading [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(1): 95-114.
[2] GUO Han, LIAN Zhi-cong. Urban Digital Economy Driving High-quality Development of Enterprises: Theoretical Logic and Empirical Test [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(5): 117-134.
[3] HAN Xi-ping, MA Chen-qian. A Thorough Understanding of High-quality Development, the Primary Task of Building A Socialist Modern Country in An All-round Way [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(1): 1-7.
[4] WANG Xiao-hua, CHENG Lin. Digital Inclusive Finance and the Urban-Rural Income Gap: Opportunity or Divide [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 127-146.
[5] HUANG Shun-chun, DENG Wen-de. An Analysis of the Differences and Influencing Factors of the High-quality Development of China’s Regional Economy [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 82-93.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YE Lin, LU Wei. Bringing Relationships Back into Contracts: The Practical Logic of Sustainable Governance in Older Residential Communities—A Case Study of Trust-Based Property Management in Chengdu[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(4): 29 -39 .
[2] WANG Yu-chen. On the Cultural Dimension of Ecological Civilization Theory[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 1 -8 .
[3] KONG Ming-an. A New Exploration of the Issue of Capital Power from the Perspective of Bio-politics—With a Discussion on the New Alienation of Biopolitics in the Digital-Intelligence Era[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 9 -17 .
[4] KONG Wei-yu. Two ‘interruptions' in the writing of the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right—On Its Textual Relationship with the Kreuznach Notebooks[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 18 -28 .
[5] WU Ji-fei, YANG Shi-xin. Research on the Measurement and Spatial Differentiation of the Coordinated Development of “Two Civilizations” in Chinese Modernization[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 29 -40 .
[6] LONG Xue-gang, WANG Jian-hua. The History of Actors: Reflections on the Theory of Gradual Institutional Change[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 41 -51 .
[7] ZHANG Jiao, SUN Lai-bin. Lenin's Thoughts on the Cultural Construction of the Ruling Party and Their Contemporary Implications[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 52 -60 .
[8] LI Yan-ling, SHEN Wei-zhang. Research on Digital Empowerment of Agile Governance Transformation in Large Counties[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 61 -68 .
[9] ZHENG Zhi-feng, CHEN Jing. Definition of Subjects and Implementation Pathways for Generative AI Labeling Obligations[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 69 -78 .
[10] LIN Li, YU Jun-bo. Construction and Evaluation of Citizens' Digital Literacy Indicator System[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 79 -89 .