Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (6): 98-108.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2025.06.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Ethical Review and Governance Approach of Educational Reform Risk in the Digital Age—A Study from the Perspective of Responsibility Ethics

FAN Yong-feng, XIE Ding-xiang   

  1. Research Center for Basic Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
  • Received:2025-04-18 Online:2025-11-05 Published:2025-12-09

Abstract: In the digital age, big data, block-chain, generative artificial intelligence, for its enjoying scientific, personalized and precise advantages, has brought new development opportunities for education reform on one hand, and triggered deeper risks on the other. These risks are mainly manifested by the facts that the digital divide increases the educational injustice, that the digital impact threatens the information security, that the digital survival inhibits the overall development, and that the digital discipline causes the subjectivity crisis. Such characteristics as trans-temporal, indirect and anonymous, make the identity of each subject overlapped and thus difficult to be transformed. To be more specific, everyone is responsible but no one takes responsibility, and the blurred boundary is an important issue ignored in risk management. With such unpredictable potential risks, the constraints of responsibility ethics are more flexible, so that the action subjects can take the initiative to deal with the risks of educational reform by virtue of the conscious construction of “subject responsibility”. Therefore, to avoid, from the perspective of responsibility ethics, the risk of educational reform in the digital age, we should fulfill the forward-looking responsibility and bridge the digital divide, take formal responsibility to ensure digital security, strengthen contractual responsibility and implement students’ all-round development, improve the natural responsibility, and strengthen the subject consciousness.

Key words: digital age, educational reform, educational reform risks, risk management, responsibility ethics, responsibility boundary

CLC Number:  G440-01
[1] 杨银付.“互联网+教育”带来的教育变迁与政策响应[J].教育研究,2016(6):4-8.
[2] 王峰.教育市场主动融入教育强国建设[EB/OL].(2024-04-24)[2024-12-19].https://www.21jingji.com/article/20240424/herald/f2c3df334156e58cdaa30905e3ad7f90.html.
[3] 王峰.教育数字化:颠覆教育体验的新起点[EB/OL].(2024-04-24)[2024-12-19].https://www.21jingji.com/article/20240424/herald/c1215aadbc76cc2a217a8035305452fc.html.
[4] 严斌剑,靳振忠.互联网普及能够促进教育公平吗?——基于中国省级面板数据的实证研究[J].中共南京市委党校学报,2022(3):59-70.
[5] 中国互联网络信息中心.第55次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[EB/OL].(2025-01-17)[2025-01-21].https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2025/0117/c88-11229.html.
[6] 布尔迪厄.文化资本与社会炼金术:布尔迪厄访谈录[M].包亚明,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997.
[7] 王美,随晓筱.新数字鸿沟:信息技术促进教育公平的新挑战[J].现代远程教育研究,2014(4):97-103.
[8] Van Dijk J A.The evolution of the digital divide-the digital divide turns to inequality of skills and usage[M].Amsterdam:IOS Press,2012.
[9] 袁磊,刘美玲.数字化助推中国教育现代化建设的实践范围与成熟度探析——基于2010—2024年文献分析[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024(4):77-87.
[10] 张华平,李林翰,李春锦.ChatGPT中文性能测评与风险应对[J].数据分析与知识发现,2023(3):16-25.
[11] 王国豫,梅宏.构建数字化世界的伦理秩序[J].中国科学院院刊,2021(11):1278-1287.
[12] 王天一.人工智能革命:历史、当下与未来[M].北京:北京时代华文书局,2017.
[13] 中华人民共和国最高人民检察院.上海虹口区:两起刑事附带民事公益诉讼案获判[EB/OL].(2020-03-24)[2025-01-13].https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/zl/gyssjxs/202003/t20200324_457239.shtml.
[14] 赵祥麟.杜威教育名篇[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2006.
[15] [美]凯斯·桑斯坦.信息乌托邦:众人如何生产知识[M].毕竞悦,译.北京:法律出版社,2008.
[16] 檀慧玲,王玥.论立德树人监测与评价的关键要素与制度体系[J].课程·教材·教法,2021(12):115-121.
[17] 邱仁宗,黄雯,翟晓梅.大数据技术的伦理问题[J].社会与科学,2014(1):36-48.
[18] 刘庆昌.教育是一种情感实践[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(4):149-157.
[19] 蓝江.从身体感知到机器感知——数字化时代下感知形式的嬗变[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2023(3):13-20.
[20] 郑新蓉.试论教师权利与义务的几个问题[J].高等师范教育研究,1998(3):20-24.
[21] 陶西平.未来不再遥远[J].人民教育,2018(17):30-32.
[22] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府.中共中央办公厅 国务院办公厅印发《关于加强科技伦理治理的意见》[EB/OL].(2022-03-20)[2025-01-13].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2022-03/20/content_5680105.htm.
[23] 陈小平.人工智能:技术条件、风险分析和创新模式升级[J].科学与社会,2021(2):1-14.
[24] 倪娟,王澍,高慧珠,等.我国教育风险研究现状与展望[J].教育研究与实验,2018(4):31-36.
[25] 王雯,姜迎迎,韩锡斌.全球教育数字化政策的偏好与启示——基于101份文件的政策主题与工具二维分析[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2024(7):55-64.
[26] 刘洋溪.迈向敏捷治理:教育数据治理的风险识别与优化路径[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024(6):154-164.
[27] Adam B, Van Loon J, Beck U.The risk society and beyond:critical issues for social theory[M].London:Sage Publications,2000.
[28] 王娟,周琼,张雅君,等.教育数字人应用:场景分析、风险审视与应对策略[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025(3):51-62.
[29] 田广兰,李兰芬.论现代社会道德责任之基础——基于现代技术挑战的伦理思考[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(2):36-43.
[30] [英]哈耶克.自由宪章[M].杨玉生,冯兴元,陈茅,等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.
[31] [德]康德.道德形而上学原理[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002.
[32] 甘绍平.伦理学的当代建构[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2015.
[33] [德]马克斯·韦伯.学术与政治[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998.
[34] [德]汉斯·约纳斯.技术、医学与伦理学:责任原理的实践[M].张荣,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2008.
[35] Jonas H. The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age[M].Chicago:University of Chicago press, 1984.
[36] 杨利利.责任伦理视域下大学生生命观教育研究[M].北京:九州出版社,2022.
[37] 苏娜.责任伦理:信息化时代道德教育的后人类归途[J].中国远程教育,2022(12):18-25.
[38] 苏娜,韩晓颖.论碳中和时代的学生自然责任伦理教育[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2023(12):74-84.
[39] 甄晶.基于责任伦理视阈的大学生网络伦理责任论析[J].中国成人教育,2014(9):38-41.
[40] 卢海丽,张立国,刘晓琳,等.数智时代教师责任伦理的守正创新[J].自然辩证法研究,2025(1):139-144.
[41] Papyshev G, Yarime M. The state’s role in governing artificial intelligence: development,control and promotion through national strategies[J]. Policy Design and Practice, 2023, 6(1): 79-102.
[42] 甘绍平.应用伦理学前沿问题研究[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2002.
[43] 汉斯·约纳斯.责任伦理[M].方秋明,译.香港:世纪出版有限公司,2013.
[41] 刘权.论互联网平台的主体责任[J].华东政法大学学报,2022(5):79-93.
[45] [美]蒂姆·奥莱利.未来地图:技术、商业和我们的选择[M].杨晨曦,戴茗玥,蔡敏瑜,译.北京:电子工业出版社,2018.
[46] 郭利强.数字时代的教材编制:技术伦理与风险规避[J].课程·教材·教法,2021(2):43-49.
[47] 中华人民共和国教育部.教育部关于加强新时代教育管理信息化工作的通知[EB/OL].(2021-03-15)[2024-12-20].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/202103/t20210322_521669.html.
[48] 董晓辉,郑小斌,彭义平.高校教育大数据治理的框架设计与实施[J].中国电化教育,2019(8):63-71.
[49] Department for Education. Generative artificial intelligence in education call for evidence: summary of responses [R]. London: Department for Education, 2023.
[50] 张成岗,张仕敏,黄晓伟.信息技术、数字鸿沟与社会公正——新技术风险的社会治理[J].中国科技论坛,2018(5):136-144.
[51] [美]尼古拉·尼葛洛庞帝.数字化生存[M].胡泳,范海燕,译.北京:电子工业出版社,2017.
[52] 张博.数字治理的责任伦理向度:情境转换、实践困境与破解之道[J].理论探讨,2023(4):76-82.
[53] UNESCO.Draft text of the UNESCO recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence [EB/OL].(2022-03-26)[2024-12-20].https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379920.
[54] 陈小平.大模型关联度预测的形式化和语义解释研究[J].智能系统学报,2023(4):894-900.
[55] 吴增基.理性精神的核心价值观及其在当代中国的意义[J].南开学报,2004(4):44-50.
[56] 董春雨.从机器认识的不透明性看人工智能的本质及其限度[J].中国社会科学,2023(5):148-166.
[1] DUAN Shi-fei, LIU Lin-jia, QIAN Tiao-tiao. International Perspectives and Recent Advances in Research on Virtual Internationalization of Higher Education in the Digital Age [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 105-117.
[2] CHEN Zeng-zhao, SHI Ya-wen, WANG Meng-ke. The Realistic Picture of Artificial Intelligence Driving Educational Transformation —An Analysis of Teachers’ Coping Strategies with ChatGPT [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(2): 75-85.
[3] GAO Xiang. Centralization of Decision-making Power and Administrative Bureaucracy: Government Organization Reform in the Digital Ara [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(1): 8-19.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 1(1): 1 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .