Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 92-103.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2026.03.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Factors Influencing Pre-service Teachers′ Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Technology: An Empirical Analysis Based on the UTAUT Model

ZHAO Guo-hong, DONG Liang-chen   

  1. Teachers College, Yanbian University, Yanji 133002, China
  • Received:2025-12-17 Online:2026-05-05 Published:2026-04-27

Abstract: As the core force of the future teaching workforce, pre-service teachers′ acceptance of artificial intelligence technology is crucial for its practical application and sustainable development in the teaching field. Based on this, the UTAUT model is employed to explore the factors influencing their acceptance of AI technology. Empirical analysis shows that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and AI literacy have significant positive effects on behavioral intention, whereas perceived risk takes a significant negative effect. Social influence bears the most prominent predictive effect on behavioral intention; AI literacy, performance expectancy, and other variables show significant positive effects, while perceived risk shows a significant negative effect. Gender, major, and proficiency level play moderating roles in the paths of "AI literacy → behavioral intention" and "effort expectancy → performance expectancy." Based on attribution analysis, targeted strategies to enhance pre-service teachers′ acceptance of AI technology can be proposed from three dimensions namely environment, perception, and individual-shaping positive norms and improving supporting conditions, enhancing utility perception and reducing risk perception, and stimulating endogenous motivation and cultivating sustained willingness to use.

Key words: pre-service teachers, artificial intelligence, AI technology, technology acceptance, UTAUT model

CLC Number:  G434
[1] WU Di, FENG Qian-yi, CHEN Xu. Identifying and Addressing Security Risks of Educational Agents [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(3): 67-78.
[2] YUAN Lei, YU Hao-yuan. A New Form of STEM Education Supported by Multi-Agent Systems: Internal Mechanism, System Construction, and Practical Research [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(3): 79-91.
[3] WANG Ya-juan. The Reality of Embodied Perception -With a Critique of Thomas Fuchs’s Phenomenological Conception of the Person [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(3): 156-165.
[4] ZHOU Wen, FANG Tian. New Quality Productive Forces and Total Factor Productivity: Theoretical Logic and Practical Pathways [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(1): 8-17.
[5] WU Xiao-lin, LI Jiang-ping. Maintaining “Creative Sovereignty”: The Transformation of Public Governance Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(1): 53-63.
[6] HAN Zhi-ming, ZHOU Liang-zi. Towards Information Asymmetry in the Age of AI—An Analysis Based on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Public Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(1): 64-75.
[7] WANG Dian-li, LI Shi-xiang. AI-Driven Public Services: Efficiency Revolution, Scenario Reconstruction, and Value Changes [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(1): 76-87.
[8] SHANG Jun-jie, HE Yi-lin, LIU Yu. The Value and Approaches of Empowering Teacher Development with Generative Artificial Intelligence [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(1): 88-97.
[9] ZHANG Yi, XU Qing-wen, LIU Chun. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Basic Research on Enterprise Innovation Performance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 62(1): 149-167.
[10] HAO Yang, HUANG Xin-quan. Contradiction Analysis and Path Reconstruction of Digital Technology Development [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(6): 11-19.
[11] SHEN Tian-yi, LAN Jiang. The Other and Jouissance in the Space of Intelligent Platforms—A Contemporary Social Reflection Based on Psychoanalysis [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(6): 28-34.
[12] YUE Wei, LI Wen-juan. The Logic, Challenges and Practice Approaches of Artificial Intelligence Empowering Reform of Education for Sustainable Development [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(6): 87-97.
[13] REN Bao-ping. Constructing an Autonomous Knowledge System for Artificial Intelligence Economics in the Context of the AI Revolution [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(6): 120-129.
[14] ZHENG Zhi-feng, CHEN Jing. Definition of Subjects and Implementation Pathways for Generative AI Labeling Obligations [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 69-78.
[15] QU Rong. Attribution of Moral Responsibility for Artificial Intelligence —Responsibility Chasm Argument and Response [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(5): 145-154.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!