Abstract: Since Huang Kan’s exegetics and Schleiermacher’s hermeneutics share research objects and research method with the same attributes, and occupy equivalent historical positions in respective course of academic development, they have a strong comparability. Huang Kan, on the basis of his comprehensive and profound exegetical practice, got the exegesis rid of the subordinate status of the classics, and made it an independent discipline that studied all the characteristics and laws of “language interpreting language”. And Schleiermacher proposed a hermeneutic system for studying and interpreting classical works based on a full study of the Bible and other classical works represented by Plato’s works. Therefore, both of them are of creative significance in the eastern and the western development history of the interpretation theory. Due to different historical origins, Huang Kan’s exegetics and Schleiermacher’s hermeneutics have significant differences in the interpretation of the target and the development path, they have relatively strong complementarity. In view of this, it is of great practical significance for the present construction of exegetics theory to absorb actively the rational elements of the Western Hermeneutics theory represented by Schleiermacher.

Key words: Huang Kan’s exegetics, Schleiermacher’s hermeneutics, major difference