Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (5): 90-104.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2025.05.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Virtual Pipeline Manager: Reconstructing the Role of Screen Bureaucrats in Management Information Systems

ZHANG Xue-fan1, YAN Hai-na2, WANG Lu-han3   

  1. 1. School of Government, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China;
    2. School of Politics and Public Administration, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510000, China;
    3. School of Politics and Public Administration, Wuhan University,Wuhan 430000, China
  • Received:2024-03-28 Online:2025-09-05 Published:2025-09-18

Abstract: Screen bureaucrats have long been studied in contrast to street-level bureaucrats, yet their intrinsic operational logic has rarely been examined independently. As a result, available research on screen bureaucrats remains largely confined to perspectives such as decision-making and implementation. With the increasing personalization and diversification of management information systems (MIS), more administrative tasks are now being completed through screen-based interactions. Consequently, the traditional role of screen bureaucrats as virtual pipeline managers has been overshadowed by other functions, leading to conceptual ambiguity. By revisiting the narrative characteristics inherent to screen bureaucrats, this study reveals that, while they remain embedded within administrative systems, they now assume roles distinct from traditional bureaucrats: a personalized role with neither purely organizational rationality nor individual behavior within the system; an active role playing neither as traditional bureaucrat nor as street-level entrepreneur in multi-source information contexts; a mediating role subject to neither command-and-obedience nor discretionary judgment in discursive arbitration.

Key words: screen bureaucrats, management information system, role reconstruction, street-level bureaucrats

CLC Number:  D630
[1] Bovens M, Zouridis S. From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: how information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control[J]. Public Administration Review, 2002, 62(2): 174-184.
[2] 叶娟丽,马骏. 公共行政中的街头官僚理论[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2003(5): 612-618.
[3] 吕德文.治理技术如何适配国家机器——技术治理的运用场景及其限度[J].探索与争鸣,2019(6):59-67,158.
[4] 韩志明.街头官僚及其行动的空间辩证法——对街头官僚概念与理论命题的重构[J].经济社会体制比较,2011(3):108-115.
[5] De Boer N, Raaphorst N. Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce[J]. Public Management Review, 2023, 25(1): 42-62.
[6] Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public service[M]. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2010.
[7] Bullock J, Young M M, Wang Y F. Artificial intelligence, bureaucratic form, and discretion in public service[J]. Information Polity, 2020, 25(4): 491-506.
[8] Gordon E, Harlow J, Whitman S A, et al. Data discretion: screen-level bureaucrats and municipal decision-making[J]. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 2024,3(5):3652950.
[9] Aviram N F, Correa C, Oliviera R. Technology 3.0: police officers'perceptions towards technology shifts[J]. The American Review of Public Administration, 2024, 54(1): 90-103.
[10] Buffat A. Street-level bureaucracy and e-government[J]. Public Management Review, 2015, 17(1): 149-161.
[11] Marienfeldt J. Does digital government hollow out the essence of street-level bureaucracy? a systematic literature review of how digital tools' foster curtailment, enablement and continuation of street-level decision-making[J]. Social Policy & Administration, 2024,6(4):1-25.
[12] Busch P A, Henriksen H Z. Digital discretion: a systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion[J]. Information Polity, 2018, 23(1): 3-28.
[13] 韩志明.街头官僚的空间阐释——基于工作界面的比较分析[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(4):583-591.
[14] 孙卓华.“互联网+”时代公共部门屏幕官僚建设研究[J].中国人力资源开发,2017(10):121-128.
[15] Jorna F, Wagenaar P. The 'iron cage' strengthened? discretion and digital discipline[J]. Public Administration, 2007, 85(1): 189-214.
[16] 林荣全.数字化时代街头官僚的责任性:分析框架与研究展望[J].电子政务,2021(10):92-104.
[17] Young M M, Bullock J B, Lecy J D. Artificial discretion as a tool of governance: a framework for understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on public administration[J]. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2019, 2(4): 301-313.
[18] 董伟伟,秦音.纵向治理结构中的基层行政:结构坍缩、行动裂解与协调进路[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023(5):45-56.
[19] 宋林霖.“行政审批局”模式:基于行政组织与环境互动的理论分析框架[J].中国行政管理,2016(6):22-28.
[20] 李华胤.使回应运转起来:线上互动中的多维问责与有效回应——以H村“互助问答”平台运作为分析对象[J].江苏社会科学,2021(1):80-90.
[21] Aviram N F, Correa C, Oliviera R. Technology 3.0: police officers' perceptions towards technology shifts[J]. The American Review of Public Administration, 2024, 54(1): 97-98.
[1] GAO Xiang. Centralization of Decision-making Power and Administrative Bureaucracy: Government Organization Reform in the Digital Ara [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(1): 8-19.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YE Lin, LU Wei. Bringing Relationships Back into Contracts: The Practical Logic of Sustainable Governance in Older Residential Communities—A Case Study of Trust-Based Property Management in Chengdu[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(4): 29 -39 .
[2] WANG Yu-chen. On the Cultural Dimension of Ecological Civilization Theory[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 1 -8 .
[3] KONG Ming-an. A New Exploration of the Issue of Capital Power from the Perspective of Bio-politics—With a Discussion on the New Alienation of Biopolitics in the Digital-Intelligence Era[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 9 -17 .
[4] KONG Wei-yu. Two ‘interruptions' in the writing of the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right—On Its Textual Relationship with the Kreuznach Notebooks[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 18 -28 .
[5] WU Ji-fei, YANG Shi-xin. Research on the Measurement and Spatial Differentiation of the Coordinated Development of “Two Civilizations” in Chinese Modernization[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 29 -40 .
[6] LONG Xue-gang, WANG Jian-hua. The History of Actors: Reflections on the Theory of Gradual Institutional Change[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 41 -51 .
[7] ZHANG Jiao, SUN Lai-bin. Lenin's Thoughts on the Cultural Construction of the Ruling Party and Their Contemporary Implications[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 52 -60 .
[8] LI Yan-ling, SHEN Wei-zhang. Research on Digital Empowerment of Agile Governance Transformation in Large Counties[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 61 -68 .
[9] ZHENG Zhi-feng, CHEN Jing. Definition of Subjects and Implementation Pathways for Generative AI Labeling Obligations[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 69 -78 .
[10] LIN Li, YU Jun-bo. Construction and Evaluation of Citizens' Digital Literacy Indicator System[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(5): 79 -89 .