Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2015, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 33-41.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2015.05.005
Previous Articles Next Articles
LUO Yi-fei
CLC Number:
| [1] Aldona Jonaiti. Issues in the Repatriation of Museum Collections[J].Current Anthropology, Vol. 32., No. 1, 1991. [2] Jeanette Greenfield. The Return of Cultural Treasures[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. [3] Phyllis Mauch Messenger.The Ethics of Collecting Cultural Property: Whose Culture? Whose Property? [M].Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1989. [4] Clifford James. The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography literature and art[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988. [5] Frisbie Charlotte. Navajo medicine bundles or jish: Acquisition transmission and disposition in the past and present[M]. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press,1987. [6] Ubelaker Douglas H.. Lauryn G. Grant.Human skeletal remains: Preservation or reburial? [M].Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 1989(32). [7] Echo-Hawk. Walter Museum rights vs. Indian rights: Guidelines for assessing competing legal interests in native cultural resources Review of Law and Social Change 1986(14). [8] Layton. R. Introduction. In Conflict. In the archaeology of living traditions[M]. R. Layton ed. London: Unwin Hyman. 1989. [9] Cushing Frank Hamilton.Outlines of Zuni creation myths.In 13th annual report of the Bureau of American Ethnology[M]. 1891-1892. [10] Hustito Charles. Why Zuni war gods need to be returned. In Zuni history: Victories in the 1990s[M]. E. Richard Hart and T. J. Ferguson ed. section 2:12. Seattle: Institute of the North American West 1991. [11] Merrill et al. Return of the Ahayu:da. lessons for repatriation[J]. Current Anthropology 34,1993. [12] Fenton Willian N. Return of eleven wampum belts to the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy on Grand River[J]. Canada. Ethnohistory, 1989(36). [13] Moore S. Federal Indian burial policy: Historical anachronism or contemporary reality? In Conflict in the archaeology of living traditions[M]. R. Layton ed. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989:201-210. [14] Boyd Thomas H. Jonathan Haas. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: Prospects for new partnerships between museums and Native American groups[J].Arizona State Law Journal, 1992(24). [15] Kearney W.J. Cox River Alawa/ Ngandji land claim: Report by the Aboriginal Land Commissioner 32[J]. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, 1985. [16] Bromilow G..Finders keepers?[J]. Museums Journal, 1993(3). [17] Layton R. Anthropology and Aboriginal land rights in northern Australia.In Social anthropology and development policy [M]. R. Grillo and A. Rew ed. London:Tavistock, 1985. [18] Moore S. Federal Indian burial policy: Historical anachronism or contemporary reality? In Conflict in the archaeology of living traditions[M]. R. Layton ed. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989. |
| [1] | WU Dai-hong, FAN Ya-gang. An Interpretation of Dong’s Kuant Ci from the Perspective of Formulaic Transmission [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(4): 61-66. |
| [2] | LUO Zong-zhi, PAN Yong-xue. A Study on the Non-genetic Kinship of the Yao [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(5): 18-25. |
| [3] | ZHAO Qiao-yan. On the Field Ethnography of Beam-fixing Ritual of Traditional Dwellings in the Dong Ethnic Group [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(2): 101-109. |