Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 64-75.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2019.02.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Realization and Transcendence of Villagers’ Self-governance in the Context of Rural Revitalization Strategy: A Perspective from the Relationship between Power and Resources

LI Song-you   

  1. School of Politics and Public Administration, Guangxi University for Nationalities,Nanning 530006,China
  • Received:2018-10-18 Online:2019-03-25 Published:2019-04-26

Abstract: As an effective form of grass-root democratic autonomy, the current villagers’ self-governance system in rural China was a product of a specific economic era. Since the reform and opening-up, with the transformation of the economic structure, the rural economy has undergone major changes, such as the imbalance of economic development in different rural areas, which led to the unbalanced development of villagers’ self-governance. As a result, the problems of uneven distribution of governance power exist in varying degrees. In order to know how and in what kind of form the self-governing system will sustain and develop, the author, on a basis of the analysis framework of the “power-resources” theory, by making an thorough analysis of the economic development of different villages in China and the practice of village autonomy, put forward four forms of villagers’ self-governance: retrieving governance, distributed governance, corporate governance, and project governance. At the same time, the governance of different villages determines the self-governance performance of villagers. To overcome the dilemma of “practice” of village autonomy, it is necessary to explore the effective realization forms of villagers’ self-governance under different economic conditions.

Key words: different economies, villagers’ self-governance, effective governance, realization forms

CLC Number: 

  • C912.82
[1] 仝志辉.村民自治的研究格局[J].政治学研究,2009(3):70-71.
[2] 张景峰.村民自治的法哲学分析[J].中国农村观察,2002(6):56-58.
[3] 陈琪,卢福营.中国农村村庄治理方式的发展趋势[J].中国农村观察,2001(3):65-68.
[4] 贺雪峰.论村级权力的利益网络[J].社会科学辑刊,2001(4):54-56.
[5] 胡荣.经济发展与竞争性的村委会选举[J].社会,2005(4):29-32.
[6] 伯特兰·罗素.权力论:新社会分析[M].吴友三,译.北京:商务印书馆,1998.
[7] 康晓光.权力的转移:转型时期中国权力格局的变迁[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1999.
[8] 本书编写组.村民委员会组织法讲话[M].北京:中国法制出版社,1999.
[9] 吉登斯.社会的构成[M].李康,等译.上海:三联书店,1998.
[10] 杰弗里·菲佛,杰勒尔德·R.萨兰基克.组织的外部控制:对组资源依赖的分析[M].上海:东方出版社,2006.
[11] 李少斐.“非公”经济领域党的组织资源开发之可行性分析[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(4):151-154.
[12] 李昌平.乡村治权与农民上访[J].三农中国,2008(12):1-5.
[13] 丹尼斯·朗.权力论[M].陆震纶,郑明哲,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001.
[14] 张静.基层政权:乡村制度诸问题[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007.
[15] 刘建军,陈超群.执政的逻辑:政党、国家与社会[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2005.
[16] 申端锋.维权与治权[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2009.
[17] 赵晓峰.村民自治实践中的“权力 + 资源”困境及其超越[J].中共福建省委党校学报,2013(8):26-27.
[18] 李松有.资源集中:探索村民自治基本单元的功能基础[J].山东社会科学,2016(7):49-50.
[19] 王沪宁.当代中国村落家族文化[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1999.
[20] 周石甫.当前村民自治实践中的权威现象分析[J].湖北省社会主义学院学报,2006(3):37-39.
[21] 贺雪峰,何包钢.民主化村级治理的两种类型——村集体经济状况对村民自治的影响[J].中国农村观察,2002(6):48-51.
[22] 陆学艺.重新认识农民问题[J].社会学研究,1989(6):11-15.
[23] O′Brien,Kevin.Implementing Political Reform in China’s Village[J]. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs,1994,32(7): 33-60.
[24] 卢福营,金姗姗.集体经济资源丰富背景下的村庄治理[J].中共宁波市委党校学报,2008(5):55-57.
[25] 翟丽宏.“法人行动”探略[J].广西社会科学,2005(8):173-175.
[26] 刘娅.村民自治“制度—关系”解读[J].中国农村观察,2003(5):64-65.
[27] 杨诚虎.村民委员会与中国农村社区政治发展[J].社会科学研究,1997(5):27-28.
[28] 辛秋水.中国村民自治与我国政治体制改革[J].福建论坛,1997(7):52-55.
[29] 卢福营.集体工业发达背景下的村治——以浙江省绍兴县友谊村为个案[J].浙江师范大学学报,1999(1):79-81.
[30] 徐勇,等.中国农村村级治理[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2000.
[31] 项继权.“后税改时代”的村务公开与民主管理——对湖北及若干省市的调查与分析[J].中国农村观察,2006(2):55-76.
[32] 李祖佩.论农村项目化公共产品供给的组织困境及其逻辑[J].南京农业大学学报,2012(3):8-10.
[33] 渠敬东.项目制:一种新的国家治理体制[J]. 中国社会科学,2012(5):113-118.
[34] 周飞舟.分税制十年:制度及其影响[J].中国社会科学,2006(6):100-103.
[35] 项目管理协会.项目管理知识体系指南[M].王勇,张斌,译,北京:电子工业出版社,2009.
[36] 周飞舟.财政资金的专项化及其问题 兼论“项目治国”[J].社会,2012(1):3-4.
[37] Lawrence,Susan V.Democracy,Chinese Style[J]. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs,1994,32(7):59-68.
[38] 徐勇.探索“第三波段”下的村民自治有效实现形式[N].中国社会报,2014-06-09(1).
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .