Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 1-6.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2017.01.001

    Next Articles

A brief investigation into Early German Romanticism’s critique of and transcendence over Fichte’s Philosophy

ZHANG Yun-tao   

  1. Academy of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430075, China
  • Received:2016-09-18 Published:2018-07-16

Abstract: In the view of Early German Romanticists, Fichte did not satisfy with dualism and non-radicality of Kant’s transcendental philosophy, and made efforts to deduce and derive a closed and complete system of knowledge from an unconditional first principle. However, his philosophy has many difficulties in form and content. Therefore, it should replace Idealism with Realism, deduction with the alternating proof, the subjective abstraction and speculation with the historical description and exploration. Reality is always cognitively opaque and inaccessible to consciousness to some degree, but this is not the reason for laziness in thought for the truth seeker. On the contrary, he should keep an open mind, and seek it forever. Thereby, he can increase his knowledge and will be cultivated.

Key words: Idealism, Foundationalism, Realism, Alternating proof

CLC Number: 

  • B516.39
[1] [德]康德. 纯粹理性批判[M]. 邓晓芒, 译; 杨祖陶, 校. 北京:人民出版社, 2004.
[2] Fichte. Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and other Writings[M]. Hackett Publishing Company, 1994.
[3] Manfred Frank (Hg.). Selbstbewußtseinstheorien von Fichte bis Sartre[M]. Suhrkamp, 1991.
[4] Friedrich Schlegel. Kritische Ausgabe seiner Werke. Band XVIII[M]. F. Schöningh, 1963.
[5] Novalis. Schriften, zweiter Band[M]. Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 1981.
[6] Friedrich Schlegel. Kritische Ausgabe seiner Werke. Band II[M]. F. Schöningh, 1974.
[7] Friedrich Schlegel. Kritische Ausgabe seiner Werke. Band XII[M]. F. Schöningh, 1964.
[8] Manfred Frank. Alle Wahrheit ist relativ, alles Wissen symbolisch. Motive der Grundsatz- Skepsis in der frühen Jenaer Romantik (1796) [J]. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 50 (1996).
[9] [德]荷尔德林. 荷尔德林文集[M]. 戴晖, 译. 北京:商务印书馆, 1999.
[10] Novalis. Schriften, dritter Band[M]. Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 1981.
[11] Friedrich Schlegel. Transcendentalphilosohie[M]. Felix Meiner Verlag, 1991.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 1(1): 1 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 0, (): 1 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .