Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (2): 40-50.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2021.02.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Study on the Linkage Mechanism of Legal Responsibility of Three Branch Laws in Food Ris

SONG Ya-hui   

  1. School of Law, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Received:2021-01-11 Published:2021-03-29

Abstract: The legal liability system in Food Safety Law of the PRC, influenced by the theoretical paradigm of the branch law of Chinese mainland, presents a pattern in which the civil law, the criminal law and the administrative law are separated from each other, and the legal liability of the three branch laws, in practice keeps the same pattern. Such a pattern, however, as for food risk bearing both positive and negative significance, is difficult to maintain the best deterrent effect of liability. The rule of law in food safety, from the perspective of functionalism of risk regulation, is by no means a rule of law in which public and private laws are opposed, but cooperate, and branch laws do not interfere, but link, with each other, thus avoiding the double risks of insufficient or excessive deterrence. The linkage mechanism of the liability of the three branch laws in the food risk should be built from the following aspects: the unification of the value goal of the legal liability system, the echo of the constituent elements, the coordination of the way to take over the liability, and the interaction of the liability implementation procedures.

Key words: food risk, risk regulation, responsibility deterrence, Food Safety Law of the PRC, branch law linkage

CLC Number: 

  • D922.294
[1] 全国人大常委会法制工作委员会行政法室.中华人民共和国食品安全法解读[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2015.
[2] 宋亚辉.社会基础变迁与部门法分立格局的现代发展[J].法学家,2021(1):1-14.
[3] U. S. Gen. Accounting Office. Food Safety and Security: Fundamental Changes Needed to Ensure Safe Food[M]. GAO-02-47T, Food Safety and Security,2001.
[4] Timothy M Hammonds. It Is Time to Designate a Single Food Safety Agency[J]. Food & Drug L. J. , 2004,59(3):427-432.
[5] Steven Shavell. Liability for Harm versus Rrgulation of Safety[J]. Journal of Legal studies, 1984,13(2):357-374.
[6] Steven Shavell. The Judgement Proof Problem[J]. International Review of Law and Economics ,1986(6):45-58.
[7] [德]贡塔·托依布纳,顾祝轩.私法的社会学启蒙:对谈当代著名法学家托依布纳[J].高薇,译.交大法学,2013(1):6.
[8] 宋亚辉.风险控制的部门法思路及其超越[J].中国社会科学,2017(10):136-158.
[9] 劳东燕.公共政策与风险社会的刑法[J].中国社会科学,2007(3):126-139.
[10] G T Schwartz. Does Tort Law Deter? [J]. UCLA Law Review, 1994,42:377-444.
[11] Kennth Wolpin. An Economic Analysis of Crime and Punishment in England and Wales 1894-1967[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1978,86(5):815-840.
[12] 李友根.惩罚性赔偿制度的中国模式研究[J].法制与社会发展,2015(6):109-126.
[13] 金福海.惩罚性赔偿制度研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2008.
[14] Jeremy Bentham. The Rationale of Punishment[M]. Nabu Press, 2010.
[15] [美]理查德·波斯纳.法律的经济分析(第七版)[M].蒋兆康,译.北京:法律出版社,2012.
[16] R Barry Ruback, et al. Perception and Payment of Economic Sanctions: A Survey of Offenders[J]. Fed. Probation, 2006,73(3):26.
[17] 宋亚辉.食品安全标准的私法效力及其矫正[J].清华法学,2017(2):155-175.
[18] 朱广新.惩罚性赔偿制度的演进与适用[J].中国社会科学,2014(3):104-124.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 67 -75 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 81 -88 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 109 -114 .