CLC Number:
| [1] Claude Hagège. Adpositions [M]. Boston: Oxford University Press, 2010. [2] 郭熙.关于“动词+‘到’+处所词语”的句法分析[J].南京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1987(3). [3] 俞咏梅.论“在+处所”的语义功能和语序制约原则[J].中国语文, 1999(1). [4] 张国宪.“在+处所”构式的动词标量取值及其意义浮现[J].中国语文, 2009(4). [5] 柯理思.论北方方言中位移终点标记的语法化和句位义的作用[C]//吴福祥,崔希亮. 语法化与语法研究(四).北京:商务印书馆,2009. [6] Peyraube, Alain. On the history of Chinese locative prepositions[C]//Paul Jen-kuei Li, Chu-Ren Huang & Chih-Chen Jane Tang. Chinese Languages and Linguistics (2): Historical Linguistics. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, 1994. [7] Sun, Chaofen. Word-order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese [M].Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996. [8] 张赪.汉语介词词组词序的历史演变[M].北京:北京语言文化大学出版社,2002. [9] 刘丹青.语序类型学与介词理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003. [10] 何洪峰.汉语方式状语[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012. [11] 石毓智,李讷.汉语语法化的历程[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001. [12] 戴浩一.时间顺序和汉语的语序[J].国外语言学,1988(1). [13] 洪波.论平行虚化[J].汉语史研究集刊,2000(2). [14] 许嘉璐.论同步引申[J].中国语文,1987(1). [15] 马贝加.介词“就”的产生及其意义[J].语文研究,1997(4). [16] Lakoff, George. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind [M].Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. [17] Brugman, Claudia. The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon [M].New York: Garland, 1988. [18] Evans, Vyvyan & Andrea Tyler. Rethinking English ‘Prepositions of Movement’: The Case of To and Through [J].Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 2004(1). [19] Langacker, Ronald W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol.1: Theoretical Prerequisites [M].Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987. |
| [1] | . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 67-75. |
| [2] | . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 103-108. |
| [3] | FAN Zhong-yuan. The Typology Research of the Strength Degree and Semantic Generalization Level of the Cross-Class Combination of the Universal Classifiers [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(4): 49-54. |
| [4] | ZONG Shou-yun. Semantic Characteristic of “Dao” and Difference among “Dao”, “Tiao” and “Gen” [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(2): 77-82. |