Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 83-96.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2021.04.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Beyond Technocrats: the Connotation of Officials With a Sense of Responsibilities and Duties in the New Era ——An Exploratory Study

DUAN Che-che, WANG Tian-feng, CHEN Jia-xi   

  1. Institution of Urban Governance, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518128, China
  • Received:2021-02-20 Online:2021-07-25 Published:2021-09-06

Abstract: “a sense of responsibilities and duties”, in the new era, though having been raised as an important indicator of official selection and evaluation by China’s central government, bears no clear definition in academic circles, while its antonym has been listed the focus of academic discussion. This study, based on literature review and text quantification, combs the relevant documents issued by 16 provinces such as Hubei, Hunan, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Gansu and Sichuan, and constructs a connotation model for the specific connotation of the sense of this kind from four aspects namely individual, organization, behavior and result. The connotation, the study tells, covers political consciousness (willingness), professionalism (capability), courage to undertake tasks (initiative), and good performance (pursuit of excellency). As a local concept, it reflects the value synthesis and strict standards, surpasses the “technocratic” behavior requirements of Weber’s bureaucratic model, and covers the new bureaucratic concept reflecting the “direct response” ethics in recent years. This connotation model thus provides an important research basis for enhancing China’s official selection system.

Key words: party and government officials, a sense of responsibilities and duties, technocrats, professionalism, assessing officials’ performance

CLC Number: 

  • D262.2
[1] 段哲哲.基层公务员对群众回应性的来源:压力、价值观或观念形态?——基于我国东中部10市基层公务员调研证据[J].公共行政评论,2019(6):85-109+200-201.
[2] 马振清.“为官不为”的症结何在[J].人民论坛,2019(9):26-27.
[3] 周雪光.基层政府间的“共谋现象”——一个政府行为的制度逻辑[J].开放时代,2009(12):40-55.
[4] 倪星,王锐.从邀功到避责:基层政府官员行为变化研究[J].政治学研究,2017(2):42-51+126.
[5] [美]詹姆斯·Q.威尔逊.政府机构的行为及其动因:美国官僚体制[M]. 李国庆,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2019.
[6] 段哲哲,陈家喜.新时代地方干部担当作为激励机制分析[J].政治学研究,2021(1):139-150+160.
[7] 田先红.从结果管理到过程管理:县域治理体系演变及其效应[J].探索,2020(4):26-36.
[8] 武良刚,朱宗友.近年来国内“为官不为”问题研究综述[J].云南行政学院学报,2018(4):81-89.
[9] 段鑫星.“为官不为”的成因及治理:基于行政人格的视角[J].湖湘论坛,2016(4):18-23.
[10] 袁书杰,胡月星.基于胜任力的领导干部敢于担当指标体系研究[J].领导科学,2020(4):53-55.
[11] 萧鸣政,王晨舟,吴万鹏,白增涛.“敢于担当”型领导考评标准的实证研究:结构探索与量表编制[J].中国人力资源开发,2015(5):42-49+89.
[12] 萧鸣政.用哪些指标来评价敢于担当型干部[J].人民论坛,2018(8):32-34.
[13] 刘帮成,张宗贺.“为官不为”行为的内容及结构研究:基于扎根理论的探索[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2019(3):24-33.
[14] 周雪光,程宇.通往集体债务之路:政府组织、社会制度与乡村中国的公共产品供给[J].公共行政评论,2012(1):46-77+180.
[15] 周雪光.运动型治理机制:中国国家治理的制度逻辑再思考[J].开放时代,2012(9):105-125.
[16] 周雪光.“有组织的无序”:封闭系统中组织决策的困境[EB/OL].(2020-03-01)[2021-03-22].https://www.sohu.com/a/377006407_267673.
[17] Rothstein B . The Chinese paradox of high growth and low quality of government: the cadre organization meets max weber[J]. Governance, 2015(4):533-548.
[18] Dasandi N, Esteve M. The politics-bureaucracy interface in developing countries[J]. Public Administration and Development, 2017(4): 231-245.
[19] Hall S G . Bureaucratic responsiveness: conceptual issues and current research[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1992(1):63-88.
[20] Park C O, Han S. Bureaucratic responses to the cross pressures of political neutrality in relation to cultural orientation and role perception: the case of Korean civil servants[J]. Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 2018(3): 47-71.
[21] Leemann L, Wasserfallen F. The democratic effect of direct democracy[J]. American Political Science Review, 2016(4): 750-762.
[22] Miller G, Hammond T. Why politics is more fundamental than economics: incentive-compatible mechanisms are not credible[J]. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1994(1): 5-26.
[23] 段哲哲.“选调生”培养何以有效?——一个回应性冲突的情景设计[J].公共行政评论,2021(2):85-110+230-231.
[24] 吴少微,魏姝.发达国家公务员专业化的演变及其启示[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2018(6):126-134.
[25] Riggs F W. Viable constitutionalism and bureaucracy[C]//Baaklini A I, Desfosses H. Designs for democratic stability: studies in viable constitutionalism. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe,1997:95-125.
[26] Mccall M., Lombardo M., Morrison A. The lessons of experience: how successful executives develop on the job[M]. New York: The Free Press, 1988.
[27] Kearney R C, Sinha C. Professionalism and bureaucratic responsiveness: conflict or compatibility?[J]. Public Administration Review, 1988(1): 571-579.
[28] 刘元春.没有提升效率的改革是添乱的改革[EB/OL].(2018-12-26)[2019-12-11]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1615367603611728792.
[29] Huber, Gregory A. The craft of bureaucratic neutrality: interests and influence in governmental regulation of occupational safety[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press,2007.
[30] 过勇, 卢文超. 职业经历视角下优秀地方领导干部成长规律研究——以县委书记为例[J]. 公共行政评论, 2018(3):28-49+209-210.
[31] Roberts N C, King P J. Policy entrepreneurs: their activity structure and function in the policy process[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1991(2): 147-175.
[32] 苏伟业. 政策营销: 理论重构与实践[J]. 中国行政评论, 2007(1): 1-34.
[33] Dunleavy P, Margetts H, Bastow S, et al. New public management is dead-long live digital-era governance[J]. Journal of public administration research and theory, 2006(3): 467-494.
[34] 陈家喜.地方官员政绩激励的制度分析[J].政治学研究,2018(3):72-80+128.
[35] 尚虎平,雷于萱.我国政府潜绩评估研究——面向东中西部50个县级政府的探索性实证评价[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2018(6):4-17+126.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[3] LIU Shang-qiong. Escaping from “Poverty Trap”: Empirical Analyses on Long-term Economic and Social Development in Countries along the Maritime Silk Road[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 62 -69 .
[4] LIU Yu-jun. On Styles of Tang and Song Dynasties in Collected Poems of Baiyun Villa by Vietnamese Poet Ruan Bingqian[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 90 -97 .
[5] YANG Xin. Action-Reflection Path of the Generation Mechanism of Teacher’s Practical Knowledge[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 112 -120 .
[6] BIN Chang-chu. On Three Researches on the New-found Historical Documents on the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(1): 18 -22 .
[7] LI Xiao-le. The Historical Logic of the Evolution of the State Governance Model in New China[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(1): 43 -48 .
[8] WAMG Chun-hua, YI Lian-yun. Children’s Subjectivity: The Logical Starting Point of Children’s Organization and Ideology Development Discipline[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(1): 61 -64 .
[9] JIANG Wen-ning. An Analysis of “Two Dimensional” Consumption Subculture among Post-1990s Undergraduates[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(1): 70 -75 .
[10] ZHAO Yan-hua, GUO Xiao-fan, ZHAO Ming. A Complex Networks-based Study of Cognitive Attributes of Words about Animals in Vietnamese and Chinese[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(1): 84 -90 .