Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (5): 37-49.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2022.05.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Agile Governance of Data: Value Remodeling and Framework Construction

YU Wen-xuan, WEI Wei   

  1. School of Public Policy, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
  • Received:2022-04-20 Online:2022-09-15 Published:2022-11-10

Abstract: Data has become an important strategic resource for the modernization of national governance capacity and governance system. China’s data governance system is not perfect and the governance model is linear and single, which renders the governance efficiency not obvious. In recent years, agile methods, which have sprung up in software engineering, have gained success due to its dynamic efficiency and strong responsiveness, thus providing theoretical basis and experience reference for solving the current data governance problems. Therefore, a probe, starting from the connotation characteristics, value objectives and development trends of data governance, into the theoretical and practical significance of agile methods to data governance with an aim to construct the theoretical analysis framework of data agile governance, this paper finds, can provide theoretical basis and policy guidance for better realization of data governance.

Key words: data elements, data governance, agile method, agile governance

CLC Number: 

  • D63
[1] 安小米,王丽丽.大数据治理体系构建方法论框架研究[J].图书情报工作,2019(24):43-51.
[2] 付熙雯,郑磊.开放政府数据的价值:研究进展与展望[J].图书情报工作,2020(9):122-132.
[3] 国务院.政府工作报告[EB/OL].(2022-03-12)[2022-03-20].http://www.gov.cn/premier/2022-03/12/content_5678750.htm.
[4] Janssen M, Brous P, Estevez E, et al. Data governance: organizing data for trustworthy artificial intelligence[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2020, 37(3): 101493.
[5] 高翔.超越政府中心主义:公共数据治理中的市民授权机制[J].治理研究,2022(2):15-23,123-124,2.
[6] 马符讯,张照生.新兴产业的政府数字治理研究——以新能源汽车国家监测与管理平台为例[J].管理评论,2021(11):94-105.
[7] 于文轩.奔跑的大象:超特大城市的敏捷治理[J].学海,2022(1):139-149.
[8] Mergel I, Ganapati S, Whitford A B. Agile: a new way of governing[J]. Public Administration Review, 2021, 81(1): 161-165.
[9] 张康之.数据治理:认识与建构的向度[J].电子政务,2018(1):2-13.
[10] Schmidthuber L, Ingrams A, Hilgers D. Government openness and public trust: the mediating role of democratic capacity[J]. Public Administration Review, 2021, 81(1): 91-109.
[11] 安小米,白献阳,洪学海.政府大数据治理体系构成要素研究——基于贵州省的案例分析[J].电子政务,2019(2):2-16.
[12] 于文轩.大数据之殇:对人文、伦理和民主的挑战[J].电子政务,2017(11):21-29.
[13] 谢娟.教育数据治理的伦理框架:价值、向度与路径[J].现代远程教育研究,2020(5):15-24.
[14] Young M M. Implementation of digital-era aovernance: the case of open data in US cities[J]. Public Administration Review, 2020, 80(2): 305-315.
[15] 程啸.论大数据时代的个人数据权利[J].中国社会科学,2018(3):102-122,207-208.
[16] 夏义堃.试论政府数据治理的内涵、生成背景与主要问题[J].图书情报工作,2018(9):21-27.
[17] 孟天广,黄种滨,张小劲.政务热线驱动的超大城市社会治理创新——以北京市“接诉即办”改革为例[J].公共管理学报,2021(2):1-12,164.
[18] 郭斌,蔡静雯.基于价值链的政府数据治理:模型构建与实现路径[J].电子政务,2020(2):77-85.
[19] 王学军,张弘.公共价值的研究路径与前沿问题[J].公共管理学报,2013(2):126-136,144.
[20] 谢康,夏正豪,肖静华.大数据成为现实生产要素的企业实现机制:产品创新视角[J].中国工业经济,2020(5):42-60.
[21] 王学军,韩志青.从测量到治理:构建公共价值创造的整合分析模型[J].上海行政学院学报,2017(6):38-49.
[22] 林建武.数据主义与价值重估:数据化的价值判断[J].云南社会科学,2020(3):45-51.
[23] 徐雅倩,王刚.数据治理研究:进程与争鸣[J].电子政务,2018(8):38-51.
[24] 胡海波.理解整体性政府数据治理:政府与社会的互动[J].情报杂志,2021(3):153-161.
[25] 贾秀飞.技术赋能与治理变革:大数据时代政府治理现代化的内在逻辑及策略回应[J].理论月刊,2021(6):85-94.
[26] 赵娟,孟天广.数字政府的纵向治理逻辑:分层体系与协同治理[J].学海,2021(2):90-99.
[27] 王真平.政府数据开放许可协议:理论源流、法律属性与法治进路[J].图书馆学研究,2021(11):58-65.
[28] 唐皇凤.数字利维坦的内在风险与数据治理[J].探索与争鸣,2018(5):42-45.
[29] 谢秋山,陈世香.弥补而非打破官僚制:国家治理现代化背景下的任务型组织再认识[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2018(5):11-20,125.
[30] 张爱军.“算法利维坦”的风险及其规制[J].探索与争鸣,2021(1):95-102,179.
[31] 郭春镇.对“数据治理”的治理——从“文明码”治理现象谈起[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2021(1):58-70.
[32] 王芳,陈锋.国家治理进程中的政府大数据开放利用研究[J].中国行政管理,2015(11):6-12.
[33] 郑磊. 开放的数林: 政府数据开放的中国故事[M].上海: 上海人民出版社,2018.
[34] 梁玥.政府数据开放与公共数据治理的法律机制[J].江汉论坛,2021(8):127-130.
[35] 胡业飞,孙华俊.政府信息公开与数据开放的关联及治理逻辑辨析——基于“政府-市场-社会”关系变迁视角[J].中国行政管理,2021(2):31-39.
[36] 宋华琳.中国政府数据开放法制的发展与建构[J].行政法学研究,2018(2):35-46.
[37] 侯晓丽,彭靖,赵需要.政府数据开放中国家秘密的泄露风险与保护策略[J].情报理论与实践,2018(7):53-59.
[38] 高富平.同意≠授权——个人信息处理的核心问题辨析[J].探索与争鸣,2021(4):87-94,178.
[39] 王毛路,华跃.数据脱敏在政府数据治理及开放服务中的应用[J].电子政务,2019(5):94-103.
[40] 贾开.数字治理的反思与改革研究:三重分离、计算性争论与治理融合创新[J].电子政务,2020(5):40-48.
[41] MergelI , Gong Y , Bertot J . Agile government: systematic literature review and future research[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2018, 35(2):291-298.
[42] 韩啸,陈亮.政府数据开放价值创造缘何失败?——基于价值共同破坏视角的新解释[J].公共管理评论,2021(3):92-112.
[43] 伲永贵.公共价值视域下区域合作治理:现实困境与有效策略[J].现代经济探讨,2020(12):105-109.
[44] 徐湘林.新时期我国督查制度和运行机制的再认识[J].中国行政管理,2019(12):6-9.
[45] 梁宇,郑易平.我国政府数据协同治理的困境及应对研究[J].情报杂志,2021(9):108-114.
[46] Abraham R, Schneider J, Vom Brocke J. Data governance: a conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2019, 49: 424-438.
[47] Van den Broek T, Van Veenstra A F. Governance of big data collaborations: how to balance regulatory compliance and disruptive innovation[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 129: 330-338.
[48] 沈岿.数据治理与软法[J].财经法学,2020(1):3-12.
[49] 鲍静,贾开.数字治理体系和治理能力现代化研究:原则、框架与要素[J].政治学研究,2019(3):23-32,125-126.
[50] 孙斐.政府形式回应是无奈之举还是必要手段:一个整合性归因模型[J].上海行政学院学报,2022(1):28-41.
[51] Bonina C, Eaton B. Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2020, 37(3): 101479.
[52] 赵需要,侯晓丽,樊振佳,等.政府开放数据生态链的形成机理与培育策略[J].情报理论与实践,2021(6):7-17.
[53] Camboim G F, Zawislak P A, Pufal N A. Driving elements to make cities smarter: evidences from European projects[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 142: 154-167.
[54] 张亚楠.行政法视角下政府数据开放研究述评[J].电子政务,2019(4):101-108.
[55] Wang V, Shepherd D. Exploring the extent of openness of open government data—A critique of open government datasets in the UK[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2020, 37(1): 101405.
[56] 王东方.政府数据开放规范的精细化构建——基于政府数据开放与政府信息公开的关系视角[J].电子政务,2021(10):29-40.
[57] 朱峥.政府数据开放目录制度的问题及其应对之策[J].情报杂志,2021(12):143-149.
[58] 刘冰.“跨省通办”中数据共享的新挑战及协同治理策略[J].电子政务,2022(2):88-96.
[59] 丁蕖.科层制政府的数字化转型与科层制危机的纾解[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2020(6):112-120.
[60] 陈荣昌.网络平台数据治理的正当性、困境及路径[J].宁夏社会科学,2021(1):72-80.
[61] 翟云.中国数字政府建设的理论前沿问题[J].行政管理改革,2022(2):42-51.
[62] 薛澜,赵静.走向敏捷治理:新兴产业发展与监管模式探究[J].中国行政管理,2019(8):28-34.
[1] PANG Jin-you. The Achilles’ Heel of Digital Order: The Myth and Dilemma of Contemporary Data Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 11-20.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LAN Jiang. Critique of Alienated Labor under Contemporary Western Digital Capitalism—Contemporary Digital Labor Embodied in Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 1 -10 .
[2] PANG Jin-you. The Achilles’ Heel of Digital Order: The Myth and Dilemma of Contemporary Data Governance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 11 -20 .
[3] MA De-yong, HUANG Min-xuan. The Political Cognitive Basis of the Modernization of National Governance—An Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Netizens and College Students[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 21 -36 .
[4] XIE Xin-shui. Content Producers in the Meta-universe: Production Situation and Action Swamp[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 50 -61 .
[5] ZHANG Ai-jun, HE Jing-jing. The Empowerment of Digital Political Subjects by the Meta-universe: Performance, Risk and Regulation[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 62 -71 .
[6] SUO LI-ming, WANG Xue. Complex Logic, Coupling Change and Governance Transformation of Urban Intelligent Upgrading   —Take the Practice of “urban brain” as An Example[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 72 -85 .
[7] HAN Yi, LIU Can. Block-chain Empowerment: The Way of Data Security Governance in the Operation of “Internet+Government Service”[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 86 -99 .
[8] TAN Hai-bo, GUO Yi-tong. Balance and Adaptability: A Quantitative Research on Digital Economic Policies of Local Governments—An Analytical Perspective Based on “Policy Tool-Policy Preference”[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 100 -116 .
[9] WANG Jian-xin, ZHANG Yu-ke. Cooperation Mechanism and Path of Regional Market Integration of DataElements: from the Perspective of Industrial Chain Cluster[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 117 -126 .
[10] WANG Xiao-hua, CHENG Lin. Digital Inclusive Finance and the Urban-Rural Income Gap: Opportunity or Divide[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 127 -146 .