Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 42-49.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2017.05.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

An Empirical Study of FDI Effect on Intra-industry Trade Between China and ASEAN

YU Shi-hai1, LIU Hong-nan1, PENG Jian2   

  1. 1.School of Management, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004;
    2. School of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
  • Received:2016-11-14 Online:2017-09-20 Published:2018-07-14

Abstract: Since CAFTA was formally established in 2008, the bilateral intra-industry trade between China and ASEAN has been developing rapidly, and has become an important force in promoting the economic development of Southeast Asian countries. Foreign direct investment is helpful to realize the transnational flow of production factors and the optimal allocation of resources, which is an efficient approach to further improve the intra-industry trade between China and ASEAN. It can be seen from the thesis that the panel data of the FDI stock has been used to empirically analyze the impact of FDI on the intra-industry trade between China and ASEAN in 2005-2014 years. The results show that: The impact of China’s direct investment in ASEAN shows heterogeneity in bilateral intra-industry trade, vertical intra-industry trade and horizontal intra-industry trade to different members of ASEAN; besides, the dynamic change of FDI can lead to mutual extrusion between vertical and horizontal intra-industry trade.

Key words: FDI, China and ASEAN, intra-industry trade, panel data

CLC Number: 

  • F125.5(33)
[1] 喻志军,姜万军.中国产业内贸易发展与外贸竞争力提升[J].管理世界,2009(4):173-174+179.
[2] Sawyer W. C.,R. L. Sprinkle, K. Tochkov. Patterns and Determinants of Intra—industry Trade in Asia [J].Journal of Asian Economics,2010,21(5):485—493.
[3] 周丽,黄原. 中国与东盟五国产业内贸易实证研究[J]. 经济问题探索,2010(3):143-148.
[4] 蓝庆新,郑云溪. 中国-东盟区域产业内贸易分析及对策研究[J]. 亚太经济,2011(3):41-45.
[5] 吴燕,邓荣荣. 中国与东盟国家产业内贸易研究——基于面板数据随机效应模型的分析[J]. 国际经贸探索,2012(9):15-24.
[6] 杨丹萍,江奕. 中国与东盟农产品产业内贸易研究[J]. 农村经济,2014(5):66-69.
[7] 冯中朝,朱诗萌. 中国-东盟农产品产业内贸易规模、水平和结构分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015(4):29-34.
[8] 洪锐凌,邹建华,韩永辉. 我国产业内贸易的实证研究及启示[J].上海经济研究,2011(6):40-49.
[9] 张建中. 中国与东盟自由贸易区贸易、投资与中国环境协同发展程度的实证分析[J]. 生态经济,2012(9):28-32.
[10] 王三兴. 基于Probit模型的产业内贸易影响因素差异研究:以中国和东盟产业内贸易为例[J]. 国际贸易问题,2012(2):72-80.
[11] 刘卉. 交易费用视角下的《中国与东盟自由贸易区投资协议》的FDI效应[J]. 湖南社会科学,2013(6):185-188.
[12] 高铁梅.计量经济分析方法与建模——EViews应用及实例(第二版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2009.
[1] YUE Xue-lian, LIU Dong-yuan. Correlation Analysis on Occupational Quality of Population in Southwest Minority Areas and Urban Employment: Provincial Panel Data Inspection from Guangxi, Yunnan and Guizhou Provinces [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(3): 122-126.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 1(1): 1 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .