广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (6): 11-19.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2026.06.002

• 马克思主义理论与实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

李大钊文化观转型及当代启示

邹广文, 林劲博   

  1. 清华大学 马克思主义学院,北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-21 出版日期:2026-11-05 发布日期:2026-11-10
  • 作者简介:邹广文,清华大学马克思主义学院教授、博士生导师;林劲博,清华大学马克思主义学院博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“巩固文化主体性的重大理论与实践价值研究”(24&ZD209)

The Transformation of Li Dazhao’s Cultural Outlook and Its Contemporary Enlightenment

ZOU Guang-wen, LIN Jin-bo   

  1. School of Marxism, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2026-05-21 Online:2026-11-05 Published:2026-11-10

摘要: 聚焦1913—1920年李大钊思想演进的具体阶段,其文化观完成了从辩证审视东西文化、探索中西调和到以马克思主义为核心融合中西文化的系统性转型。李大钊立足传统文化,以辩证扬弃思维解构儒家思想,既批判其为专制服务的糟粕,又坚守仁爱、大同等文化精髓;以理性批判视角审视西方“动的文明”,既肯定其变革创新的精神优势,又揭露其资本逻辑下物质崇拜、制度虚伪的深层弊端。十月革命后,马克思主义的传入为李大钊提供了科学的思想武器与分析方法,推动其文化观从“中西调和”的模糊构想升华为以“社会主义第三文明论”为核心的马克思主义文化主张。这一转型不仅在“全盘西化”与“文化保守主义”的二元对立中开辟了第三条文化发展道路,更蕴含着深刻的当代启示:其守正创新的文化立场、辩证融合的思维方法、立足现实的价值导向、坚守自主的文明自信,为新时代坚持“两个结合”提供了重要的历史镜鉴与方法论遵循。

关键词: 李大钊, 文化观转型, 第三文明论, 文化主体性, 两个结合

Abstract: An insight into the specific stages of Li Dazhao’s ideological evolution from 1913 to 1920 tells that his cultural outlook experiences a systematic transformation from a dialectical examination of Eastern and Western cultures and an exploration of their reconciliation to integrating the two sides with Marxism as the core. Rooted in profound traditional Chinese cultural foundations, he deconstructed Confucianism through an approach of dialectical sublation, criticizing the dross of Confucian thought that served autocracy while upholding its cultural essences such as benevolence and universal harmony. From a rational critical perspective, he examined the Western “dynamic civilization”, affirming its spirit of reform and innovation while exposing its deep-seated drawbacks including material worship and institutional hypocrisy derived from capitalist logic. After the October Revolution, the introduction of Marxism equipped Li Dazhao with scientific ideological tools and analytical frameworks, elevating his vague conception of reconciling China and the West into a Marxist cultural proposition centered on the Theory of the Socialist Third Civilization. This transformation blazed a third path for cultural development amid the binary opposition between total Westernization and cultural conservatism during the May Fourth Movement. It also carries profound contemporary implications: Li Dazhao’s cultural stance of upholding fundamentals while pursuing innovation, dialectical integrative thinking, reality-based value orientation, and commitment to civilizational self-confidence offer vital historical references and methodological guidance for adhering to the “Two Integrations” in the new era.

Key words: Li Dazhao, transformation of cultural outlook, Theory of the Third Civilization, cultural subjectivity, the Two Integrations

中图分类号:  G0

[1] 吴宏政. 马克思世界历史理论与新文化生命体建构[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 60(3): 1-9.
[2] 李燕. 李大钊的传统文化观及其当代启示[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(3): 56-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发