Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2015, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 79-85.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2015.06.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Structure,Nature and Functions of the Insured’s Claim in the Liability Insurance: A Study on the Defects of the Article 65 and 66 of Insurance Law

LIU Yu-lin   

  1. The Law School, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
  • Online:2015-11-10 Published:2018-12-18

Abstract: The liability insurance, in a broad sense, belongs to the property insurance. According to the “principle of indemnity”, in early times, the function of liability insurance is to fill up the insured’s actual monetary loss caused by assuring compensation liability; the insured only enjoys the “insurance payment claim”. However, the liability insurance now is the litigation insurance, and then it has functions of right protection, that is, the insurer needs to help the insured to exclude the “negative state” caused by the damage claims from the third party, and the unfavorable state is the loss of the insured. Meanwhile, the nature of the insured’s claim is the “legal protection claim”. The claim includes two parts one is the “exemption claim” helping the insured exempt from compensation liability and the other is the “defense claim” helping the third party claim for compensation. The theory of “legal protection claim” is the inevitable choice for the construction of the insured’s claim in liability insurance in the future.

Key words: liability insurance, insurance payment claim, exemption claim, legal protection claim             [

CLC Number: 

  • D922.284
[1] Kenneth S.Abraham.Insurance Law and Regulation[M].New York:Foundation Press,2005.
[2] 江朝国.保险法基础理论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[3] 温世扬,姚赛.责任保险保险事故理论的反思与重构[J].保险研究,2012(8).
[4] 邹海林.责任保险论[M].北京:法律出版社,1999.
[5] [日]西岛梅治.责任保险法的研究[M].北京:同文馆,1968.
[6] 陈荣一.责任保险保护权利之给付的法律上性质[J].台中商专学报,1978(11) .
[7] 陈雅萍.论责任保险人于危险事故发生时之参预权与其为被保险人利益之防御义务[D].台北:国立政治大学保险研究所,1994.
[8] 叶启洲.保险法实例研习[M].台北:元照出版有限公司,2011.
[9] 林新裕.汽车责任保险受害第三人直接请求权之探讨[D].台北:国立政治大学风险管理与保险研究所,2002.
[10] 刘北芳.论直接请求权在任意责任保险下之定位及相关问题之研究[D].台北:国立台北大学,2013.
[11] 林铭龙.论受害第三人之直接请求权与我国法制上适用疑义[D].台北:国立台北大学法学研究所,2010.
[12] 叶铭进.论强制汽车责任保险法中受害人之保护及其相关问题——以德国法制与台湾草案之比较为中心[D].台北:国立中兴大学法律学研究所,1993.
[13] 孙宏涛.德国保险合同法[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2009.
[14] 林建智.从保护被保险人之观点论责任保险人之防御义务[R].台北:国立政治大学风险管理与保险研究所.
[15] [美]约翰·F.道宾.美国保险法[M].梁鹏,译.北京:法律出版社,2008.
[16] 黄义丰.论美国责任保险保险人之责任[J].台大法学论丛,1988(2).
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .