Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 74-80.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2017.01.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

An Study on the Semantic Meaning, Form Correlation and Pragmatic Features of Homologous Word Group — Also on the Value of Lexicology of Homologous Relation

YANG Xu-ming   

  1. College of International Culture & Education, Guangxi Teachers Education University, Nanning 530001, China
  • Received:2016-08-01 Published:2018-07-16

Abstract: Homologous relation is a kind of paradigmatic relation among words, which regards association by contiguity, association by similarity, association by contrast, association by causality and other cognitive psychology as collective bases. It is mainly expressed by homologous words. The internal members of homologous word group manifest the “family resemblance” of conceptual category on the semantic meaning. In the aspect of form, they show the morphological correlation, conspicuous phenomena of word family, phonetic harmony, multi-syllable heteronym words or close-sound words and other features. In the aspect of pragmatics, they have variation of systematicness and field dependence. In the aspect of function and subjective meaning, there are differences and series of features among the internal members. The study of the homologous relation can confirm the semantic field theory, enrich the theories and the methods of lexical research, enrich the basis of compilation of high-level thesaurus, promote the exploitation and utilization of the artificial intelligence, improve the efficiency of words teaching and promote cross-cultural communication.

Key words: thomologous relation, homologous word group, correlative features, pragmatic value

CLC Number: 

  • H030
[1] 王力.汉语史稿[M].北京:中华书局,1980.
[2] 邢福义.现代汉语[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002.
[3] 张登歧.现代汉语[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
[4] 叶蜚声,徐通锵.语言学纲要[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1997.
[5] 费尔迪南·德·索绪尔.普通语言学教程[M].高名凯,译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[6] 吴世雄,陈维振.论语义范畴的家族相似性[J].外语教学与研究,1996(4):14-19.
[7] [英]维特根斯坦.哲学研究[M].陈嘉映,译.北京:商务印书馆,2001.
[8] 杨绪明.新词语的族聚特征及其社会文化心理[J].语言教学与研究,2014(1):105-112.
[9] 周光庆.“名”族词考论[J].江汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(6):66-69.
[10] 杨绪明.当代汉语新词族研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2014.
[11] 刘甜甜.维特根劳动保护坦的语用哲学思想再探[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(4):12-127.
[12] 张生汉.关于古汉语同义词研究的一点看法[J].语言研究,2005(1):98-103.
[13] 刁晏斌.“文革”新词语考察[J].北京教育学院学报,2006(4):66-69.
[14] 张世挺.类义词典的特殊功能[J].辞书研究,1981(4):150-154..
[15] 贾彦德.汉语语义学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
[16] 宋婧婧,苏新春.类义词典中的两种类型:“同义”与“同类”——《同义词词林》与《朗文多功能分类词典》比较[J].辞书研究,2004(4):89-97.
[17] 桂诗春.应用语言学与中国英语教学[M].济南:山东教育出版社,1988.
[18] 邵敬敏.“语义语法”说略[J].暨南学报,2004(1):100-106.
[19] 马清华.语义分割细度与文化关系的解释限制[J].温州师范学院学报,2000(1):11-15.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 1(1): 1 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 0, (): 1 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .