Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (2): 46-51.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2017.02.008

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Discussionon Treatment of Relationship between Politics and Commerce in Transformation Period

ZHOU Chao   

  1. School of Politics and Public Administration, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
  • Received:2016-11-20 Online:2017-03-20 Published:2018-07-16

Abstract: The relationship between politics and commerce is a complex and sensitive subject, whose nature is to clarify the role that government and enterprise play in resource allocation. The officials, in exercising public authority on behalf of government, are supposed to take as one of their responsibility to serve enterprises. However, not only officials have the tendency of rent-seeking, but entrepreneurs tend to seek maximum interests through participating in and influencing government decision-making, which can result in the alienation of the relationship between politics and commerce. The causes of the alienation of government- commerce relation vary, yet they come down to over-centralized public power, immature market economy system, business people’s profit-seeking natureand imperfection of public administration supervision system. The establishment of a healthy government-commerce relation should be based on the rule of law, led by service, taking interaction as impetus and regard equivalence as principle.

Key words: transformation period, the relationship between politics and commerce, alienation

CLC Number: 

  • C933
[1] А.利布曼,王铁军.中亚的政商关系:比较分析的方法[J].俄罗斯研究,2009(5):57-70.
[2] 佟德志.当代中国政商关系博弈复合结构及其演变[J].人民论坛,2015(5):16-18.
[3] 张希明.政商关系:畸变与重构[J].新产经,2014(6):16-18.
[4] 中华全国工商为联合会.中国私营经济年鉴[M].北京:中华工商联合出版社,2013:67.
[5] 曹晓波,韩雪枫.贿选案后,李亿龙衡阳三年[EB/OL].新京报网,http://www.bjnews.com.cn/news/2016/04/08/399490.html.
[6] 胡润《中国富豪特别报告》:17年共35位富豪出问题[EB/OL].京华时报,http://www.chinanews.com/fortune/2015/12-16/7672784.shtml.
[7] 唐亚林.官商利益输送四种典型形态[J].人民论坛,2015(7):18-19.
[8] 韩阳,宋雅晴.非公经济人士对健康政商关系的影响及其治理[J].重庆社会主义学院学报,2015(5):42-47.
[9] 李克强.触动利益比触及灵魂还难,再深的水也得趟[EB/OL].http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2013/03-17/4650201.shtml
[10] 罗敏.法治型政府视阈下地方政府权力清单制度研究[J].成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2016,24(1):76-80.
[11] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:187.
[12] 江华.政商关系的演化与前瞻[J].江南论坛,2015(9):28-30.
[13] Francis Fukuyama. Democracy and the Quality of the State[J]. Journal of Democracy,Vol.24,Number.4,2013,p10.
[14] 徐大同,高建.中西传统政治文化比较研究[M].天津:天津教育出版社,1997:80.
[15] 习近平.官商交往要相敬如宾,不要勾肩搭背[EB/OL].http://news.sohu.com/20130309/11368225874.shtml
[16] 张艳娥.统一战线处理政商关系的作用机制及其转型创新[J].重庆社会主义学院学报,2016(1):40-47.
[17] Ingmar Bjorkman and Soren Kock. Social Relationships and Business Network:The Case of Western Companies in China[J]. International Business Review,Vol.4,No.4,1995,p519-535.
[18] 苏政,孟天广.在权力与财富之间:政商关系及其分析视角[J].国外理论动态,2015(11):54-62.
[1] TANG Zheng-dong. The Division of Capital and Labor under the Condition of Private Ownership and Its Irrationality——Young Engels’ Thoughts on Labor-Management Relations and Their Evaluation [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(1): 1-10.
[2] LIU Cheng-qun,JIN Yue-chong. On Marx and Engels’ View of Greek and Roman History:From the Bondage of Clan Community to the Alienation of Individual [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(6): 19-26.
[3] XIE Jiang-ping. On Marx’s Concept of Alienated Labor from the Perspective of Four Labor Category Groups [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(2): 19-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 1(1): 1 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .