Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 86-95.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2023.02.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

What is Minimalist Governance?

OU-Yang Jing   

  1. School of Public Finance and Public Administration, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
  • Received:2023-02-26 Online:2023-03-15 Published:2023-05-25

Abstract: The basic characteristic of minimalist governance is “semi-formal or informal governance”, and its operation relies on the boundaries between the state and society, and autonomy of the primary-level organizations. Minimalist governance, whether it follows the traditional way or modern path, is a kind of adaptation to local conditions, a semi-formal or informal governance, as well as an entity governance that highlights the effectiveness of governance rather than unnecessary formalities, when compared to formal bureaucratic governance. As it does not utterly rely on the power of the national bureaucracy, this kind of governance is simple and efficient, hence “minimalist”. The key solution to primary-level formalism lies in the policy implementation, the autonomy and autonomy space, so that primary-level organizations can play the political integration function of the Party committee and the corresponding simple governance capacity, thus well performing a role of mediator. To well understand Chinese path to modernization from the perspective of “social basis”, comprehending the modernization of its rural governance has very important practical and theoretical significance. To achieve Chinese path to modernization, we need to learn not only from the West, but also from Chinese tradition and practical experience.

Key words: minimalist governance, primary-level autonomy, informal governance, Chinese path to modernization

CLC Number:  D63-3
[1] 黄宗智. 集权的简约治理——中国以准官员和纠纷解决为主的半正式基层行政[J]. 开放时代, 2008(2): 10-29.
[2] 吕德文. 治理现代化进程中的简约治理[J]. 云南行政学院学报, 2017(6): 60-62.
[3] 赵晓峰. 中国农村基层的简约主义治理:发生机制与功能定位[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(6): 127-131.
[4] 刘伟, 黄佳琦. 乡村治理现代化中的简约传统及其价值[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(3): 40-48.
[5] 韩志明. 规模焦虑与简约治理——大国治理历史与现实的理论考察[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(4): 183-193.
[6] 任剑涛. 国家治理的简约主义[J]. 开放时代, 2010(7): 73-86.
[7] 欧阳静. 简约治理:超越科层化的乡村治理现代化[J]. 中国社会科学, 2022(3): 145-163,207.
[8] 欧阳静. 策略主义:桔镇运作的逻辑[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社, 2011.
[9] 周飞舟. 从汲取型政权到“悬浮型”政权——税费改革对国家与农民关系之影响[J]. 社会学研究, 2006(3): 1-38.
[10] 欧阳静. 中心工作与县域政府的强治理[J]. 云南行政学院学报, 2017(6): 5-13.
[11] 欧阳静. 强治理与弱治理:基层治理中的主体、机制与资源[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2018.
[12] 欧阳静. 论基层运动型治理——兼与周雪光等商榷[J]. 开放时代, 2014(6): 180-190.
[13] 欧阳静. 县域政府包干制:特点及社会基础[J]. 中国行政管理, 2020(1): 25-29.
[14] 欧阳静. 政治统合制及其运行基础——以县域治理为视角[J]. 开放时代, 2019(2): 184-198.
[15] 黄宗智. 重新思考“第三领域”:中国古今国家与社会的二元合一[J]. 开放时代, 2019(3): 12-36.
[16] 张新文, 杜永康. 过密治理与去过密化:基层治理减负的一个解释框架[J]. 求实, 2022(6): 47-57,109.
[17] 黄宗智. 实践与理论:中国社会、经济与法律的历史与现实研究[M]. 北京:法律出版社, 2015.
[18] 李怀印. 华北村治:晚清和民国时期的国家与乡村[M]. 北京:中华书局, 2008.
[19] 赵秀玲. 中国基层治理研究转向及其思考[J]. 东南学术, 2022(6): 98-106.
[20] 史云贵, 薛喆. 简约治理:概念内涵、生成逻辑与影响因素[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2022(1): 149-159.
[21] 费孝通. 中国绅士[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2006.
[22] 黄小希, 丁小溪, 林晖. 以实干成就美好未来——以习近平同志为核心的党中央引领全党力戒形式主义官僚主义综述[N]. 人民日报, 2019-03-19(1).
[23] 吕德文. 切忌用官僚主义反形式主义[J]. 半月谈, 2019(12): 3.
[24] 彭勃, 赵吉. 折叠型治理及其展开:基层形式主义的生成逻辑[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2019(11): 92-101,158-159.
[25] 颜昌武, 杨华杰. 以“迹”为“绩”:痕迹管理如何演化为痕迹主义[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2019(11): 111-121,159.
[26] 文宏, 李慧龙. 府际关系视角下基层形式主义的本质与逻辑重思[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2019(11): 102-110,159.
[27] [美]罗伯特·K. 默顿. 社会理论和社会结构[M]. 唐少杰, 齐心, 译. 南京:译林出版社, 2015.
[28] [法]米歇尔·克罗齐埃. 科层现象[M]. 刘汉全, 译. 上海:上海人民出版社, 2002.
[29] [美]戴维·奥斯本. 再造政府:五项战略:改变政府DNA[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2010.
[30] [美]B. 盖伊·彼得斯. 政府未来的治理模式[M]. 吴爱明, 夏宏图, 译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2013.
[31] [美]拉塞尔·M. 林登. 无缝隙政府:公共部门再造指南[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2013.
[32] 贺雪峰. 论农村基层组织的结构与功能[J]. 天津行政学院学报, 2010(6): 45-61,97.
[33] 徐行,王娜娜.社会治理共同体视域下社区协商治理的梗阻与突破路径[J].北京行政学院学报,2021(2):20-28.
[34] 张康之. 我们为什么要建设服务型政府[J]. 行政论坛, 2012(1): 1-7.
[1] HAN Xi-ping, MA Chen-qian. A Thorough Understanding of High-quality Development, the Primary Task of Building A Socialist Modern Country in An All-round Way [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(1): 1-7.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .