Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (5): 66-75.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2024.05.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

STEM Teacher Development and New Quality Improvement from the Organizational and Manpower Perspectives

DONG Yan, WU Nan, XIA Liang-liang   

  1. Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2024-04-01 Online:2024-09-25 Published:2024-09-13

Abstract: STEM education has become an international consensus to cultivate learners’ scientific and technological innovation ability. The landing of UNESCO IISTEM in Shanghai has well affirmed the achievements of STEM education in China and boosted the confidence of the future development of local STEM education. However, for a long time, the practice of STEM education in primary and secondary schools in China has been subject to the problem of teacher shortage due to the joint efforts of the “systemic shortage” caused by the inertia of the development of subject education and the “structural shortage” caused by the unclear outline of human capital. At present, training top innovative talents has become the main theme of education in the new era, and STEM education holds the value fulcrum “based on core literacy and training innovative talents”. The basic group of STEM teachers has been basically established, and the number of STEM teachers has grown based on their own ability transfer. The teaching mode and evaluation research promoted by colleges and universities have promoted the quality improvement of STEM teachers’ ability. With the development of educational AI and its reshaping of all elements of education, the integration of organization, human management and digital intelligence technology will jointly realize the new qualitative development of STEM education. Therefore, the research suggests that we should carry out ecological evaluation of STEM education to boost development planning, construct a competency model to promote the growth of full-time STEM teachers, and build digital resources to explore the dual-teacher (human-machine) model.

Key words: STEM education, STEM teachers, primary and secondary education, organizational and manpower perspectives, top-notch innovative talents

CLC Number:  G521
[1] 余胜泉,胡翔. STEM教育理念与跨学科整合模式[J]. 开放教育研究, 2015(4): 13-22.
[2] 李艳燕,董笑男,李新,等. STEM教育质量评价指标体系构建[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2020(2): 48-55, 72.
[3] 傅骞,刘鹏飞. 从验证到创造——中小学STEM教育应用模式研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2016 (4): 71-78, 105.
[4] 王卓玉,樊瑞净.中学STEM教师的TPCK知识结构分析[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(2):105-111.
[5] 陈凯,夏晶,陈悦. 《中国STEM教育白皮书》的文本挖掘[J]. 基础教育, 2019(3): 25-38.
[6] 易志刚. 我国STEM教育现状及本土化发展对策[J]. 科教文汇(中旬刊), 2020(23): 5-6.
[7] 胡卫平,首新,陈勇刚. 中小学STEAM教育体系的建构与实践[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017(4): 31-39, 134.
[8] 高威,袁梅,郑浩. 整合视角下的STEM课程建设——以北京市中小学为例[J]. 基础教育, 2019(4): 13-23.
[9] 曾丽颖,任平,曾本友. STEAM教师跨学科集成培养策略与螺旋式发展之路[J]. 电化教育研究, 2019(3): 42-47.
[10] 李春密,王硕. STEM教师培养的国际比较研究——以中、美、英、德为例[J]. 教师教育研究, 2018(4): 122-128.
[11] 陈思含,亓建芸,赵可云. 省域视角下中小学学生STEM教育现状调研[J]. 数字教育, 2021(5): 60-68.
[12] 王素.《2017年中国STEM教育白皮书》解读[J].现代教育,2017(7):4-7.
[13] 胡卫平. 聚焦必备特征:科技创新后备人才培养的路径选择[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2022(10): 7-11.
[14] 李俊堂. 跨向“深层治理”——义务教育新课标中“跨学科”意涵解析[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(4): 116-124.
[15] 施一公. 立足教育、科技、人才“三位一体”探索拔尖创新人才自主培养之路[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2023(10): 3-10.
[16] 石倩,何文涛,梁晨,等. 近十年国内外STEM课程研究的比较分析[J]. 比较教育学报, 2023(5): 133-146.
[17] 孔晶. 基于认知深度模型的STEM课程设计路径研究[J]. 现代教育技术, 2021(9): 112-119.
[18] 祝智庭,雷云鹤. STEM教育的国策分析与实践模式[J]. 电化教育研究, 2018(1): 75-85.
[19] 孙立会,王晓倩. 技术增强STEM教育的未来应用图景——基于《创新聚焦:技术有力支持STEM学习的九种方式》解读与启示[J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022(5): 114-122.
[20] 黄桦. STEM教育深度融入科学课程教学的实践路径[J]. 现代教育技术, 2018(5): 121-126.
[21] 李新,李艳燕,李巧英. 双师型STEM教学模式的构建与实践[J]. 现代教育技术, 2021(5): 119-126.
[22] 李世瑾,周榕,顾小清. 基于学习进阶的STEM教育模式[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2022(2): 73-84.
[23] 武建鑫,宋雨. 面向计算思维培养的 STEM课程教学模式的构建研究[J]. 教育与教学研究, 2023(2): 42-54.
[24] 周平红,牛钰琨,王康,等. 面向计算思维培养的STEM工程设计教学模式及应用[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2022(1): 104-112.
[25] 赵呈领,赵文君,蒋志辉. 面向STEM教育的5E探究式教学模式设计[J]. 现代教育技术, 2018(3): 106-112.
[26] 秦瑾若,傅钢善. 面向STEM教育的设计型学习研究:模式构建与案例分析[J]. 电化教育研究, 2018(10): 83-89, 103.
[27] 刘徽,杨佳欣,徐玲玲,等. 什么样的失败才是成功之母?——有效失败视角下的STEM教学设计研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020(6): 43-69.
[28] 董陈琦岚. 基于STEM项目学习的学生能力评价研究[D]. 天津:天津师范大学, 2017.
[29] 危怡. STEM教育中的问题解决评价研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2019.
[30] 徐佳静. 小学STEM课程学习评价指标体系构建研究[D]. 上海:上海师范大学, 2021.
[31] 李敏健. 基于STEM课程的中学生工程思维测评研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2022.
[32] 聂静. STEM协作学习情境下创造性思维评价指标体系构建研究[D].上海: 华东师范大学, 2022.
[33] 吴龙凯,张珊,刘姚慧卓,等.教育评价数据大脑的内涵、模型与路径[J/OL].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版).http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/45.1066.C.20240311.1652.006.html.
[34] 李露. 基于项目学习的STEM课堂教学评价指标体系构建研究[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学, 2019.
[35] 黄瑶杏. 科学与工程实践导向的STEM课堂教学评价研究[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学, 2021.
[36] 张启迪. 基于多元评价的小学STEM课堂特征研究[D].上海: 华东师范大学, 2022.
[37] 张娜钰. 中学STEM教师教学能力的评价指标体系研究[D]. 开封:河南大学, 2021.
[38] 首新,黄秀莉,李健,等. 基于STEM学习目标的高阶思维评价[J]. 现代教育技术, 2021(3): 20-27.
[39] 张芮. 我国STEM教育项目评价指标体系研究[D]. 北京:北京邮电大学, 2019.
[40] 赵慧臣,张娜钰,李皖豫,等. 中小学STEM教育的自我评价与改进建议[J]. 数字教育, 2021(4): 1-11.
[41] 王雯琦,丁杰,李京宣. 近十年我国STEAM教育教师培养现状分析[J]. 教育现代化, 2020(24): 42-47.
[1] YANG Yun-ying. Interdisciplinary Conceptual Learning and Understanding in STEM Education [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(5): 76-86.
[2] WANG Zhuo-yu, YU Hao-yuan, WANG Lin-lin. Research on STEAM Cultivation Mechanism Facing the Demand of New Quality Talents [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(5): 87-96.
[3] CHEN Liang, SUN Qian. The Logical Framework and Action Direction of New Research-oriented Universities’ Empowering the Mission of Building a Powerful Nation in Higher Education [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(4): 64-76.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 67 -75 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 109 -114 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 115 -119 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 126 -130 .
[5] HE Xi-ying. The Study of Contemporary Urban Rights in the Context of Marxist Space Theory[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 31 -36 .
[6] HU Da-lei. Literary Education Experience in Ancient Chinese Family Instructions and Its Enlightenments[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 70 -76 .
[7] LI Han, SHI Wei-na. The Observation and Exposition of Composing Historical Works on Liu Song Dynasty and Song Annals before and after Shen Yue’s Period[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 84 -89 .
[8] WANG Tian-Gen. The Annotations and Historical Values of Rare Historical Literature in the Era of Big Data ——The Data Processing of the Send Mail Thin in the British Library and Its Reflection of the Profile of the Qing Empire Communication[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(1): 1 -11 .
[9] LI Yu. A Study on Word Family of Po in Archaic Chinese: A Comparative Study of Cognates in Chinese Dialects and Related Languages and Reconstructions on the **mb-type Consonant Clusters in Proto-Chinese[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(1): 91 -96 .
[10] ZHONG Rui-tian, LI Xu-hua. On the Realistic Value of Marxism[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(6): 1 -11 .