Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (6): 35-43.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2025.06.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Bureaucratization of Village-Level Governance from the Perspective of Administrative Adaptability: Background, Forms, and Consequences—An Analysis Based on a Case from D Town in South China

YIN Zi   

  1. Law School, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Received:2024-03-01 Online:2025-11-05 Published:2025-12-09

Abstract: From the perspective of administrative adaptability, the bureaucratization of village-level governance results from township governments’ active adopting a series of administrative strategies to adapt to changes in their organizational environment. Facing increasingly dense primary-level governance affairs and growing administrative assessments, township governments have strong incentives to extend the administrative chain downward. In D Town, South China, the township government not only promoted the professionalization of village cadres by implementing organizational personnel intentions and setting unified salary standards but also strengthened institutional constraints on village heads by regulating the use of collective funds. In transferring numerous administrative tasks downward, the township government ultimately transformed administrative villages into solid bureaucratic entities within primary-level governance. The main consequences of this bureaucratization include the rapid contraction of village-level governance autonomy and profound challenges to the development of primary-level governance capacity. If village-level governance retains a certain degree of autonomy, the utilization of village governance resources can be closely integrated with the construction of publicness in social governance, allowing significant room for reshaping primary-level governance capacity. Otherwise, it may lead to the failure of village-level governance.

Key words: administrative adaptability, bureaucratization of village-level governance, township government, governance autonomy, primary-level governance capacity

CLC Number:  D630
[1] 刘建平,陈文琼. “最后一公里”困境与农民动员——对资源下乡背景下基层治理困境的分析[J].中国行政管理,2016(2):57-63.
[2] 费孝通.中国士绅[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2009.
[3] 欧阳静.村级组织的官僚化及其逻辑[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2010(4):15-20.
[4] 印子. 村级治理行政化的演化过程与治理效果——基于苏北C镇调研的分析[J].求实,2020(4):82-96, 112.
[5] 董磊明.农村公共品供给中的内生性机制分析[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015(5):69-75.
[6] 安永军,刘景琦.“中间结构”:资源下乡背景下国家与农民联结的新机制[J].农业经济问题,2019(9):96-107.
[7] 贺雪峰.行政还是自治:村级治理向何处去[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019(6):1-5, 159.
[8] 仇叶.城乡一体化地区乡村治理逻辑的转换——对沿海农村村级治理行政化改革的反思[J].求实, 2020(6):82-95, 110.
[9] 印子.职业村干部群体与基层治理程式化——来自上海远郊农村的田野经验[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(2):42-49, 151.
[10] [美]塞缪尔·P .亨廷顿.变化社会中的政治秩序[M]. 王冠华,刘为,等译.上海:上海人民出版社, 2008.
[11] 吕德文.“混合型”科层组织的运作机制——临时工现象的制度解释[J]. 开放时代, 2019(6):130-147.
[12] 易卓.行政调适性:理解乡镇“组线治理”机制创新的一个分析视角——基于湖南省C镇的案例研究[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2022(5):79-89.
[13] 仇叶.乡村工业化模式与农村土地制度变迁——一项对沿海地区集体经营性建设用地制度的研究[J]. 中国农村经济, 2020(4):101-123.
[14] 周飞舟.从汲取型政权到“悬浮型”政权——税费改革对国家与农民关系之影响[J].社会学研究, 2006(3):1-38, 243.
[15] 仇叶.基层服务型政府建设中的服务泛化问题及其解决[J]. 中国行政管理, 2020(11):32-40.
[16] 印子.发展型基层政权:乡镇政府的行为逻辑与角色属性——基于浙东Z镇乡村旅游产业案例的分析[J]. 北京社会科学, 2019(1):51-61.
[17] 欧阳静. 简约治理是什么[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(2):86-95.
[18] 仇叶.行政权集中化配置与基层治理转型困境——以县域“多中心工作”模式为分析基础[J]. 政治学研究, 2021(1):78-89, 156-157.
[19] 仇叶.部门工作“中心化”:县域条块关系的重组及其治理后果[J].经济社会体制比较, 2023(2):99-108.
[20] 王汉生,王一鸽.目标管理责任制:农村基层政权的实践逻辑[J].社会学研究, 2009(2):61-92, 244.
[21] 陈义媛. 内卷化的基层政权悬浮:县域多中心工作模式下的基层治理困境[J].湖北行政学院学报, 2023(6):54-62.
[22] 曹正汉.国家与社会关系的弹性:1978年以来的变化[J]. 学术界, 2018(10):5-13.
[23] 卢丛丛.监督下乡、分责秩序与乡村关系重构[J].公共管理与政策评论, 2024(2):101-116.
[24] 熊万胜.基层自主性何以可能——关于乡村集体企业兴衰现象的制度分析[J].社会学研究, 2010(3):48-81, 244.
[25] 付伟,焦长权.“协调型”政权:项目制运作下的乡镇政府[J].社会学研究,2015(2):98-123, 243-244.
[26] 王绍光.国家治理与基础性国家能力[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(3):8-10.
[27] 印子.乡村振兴中国家与农民关系的社会化调适[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024(1):163-172.
[1] HAN Yi, CAO Nan-yan. Why Are Township Strengthening Reforms Effective?—A Multi-Case Qualitative Comparative Analysis from the Perspective of Government Authority and Functional Capacity [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(6): 44-56.
[2] LI Zhi-chao, YU Xiang. The Phenomenon of “Starting from Scratch” for Primary-level Government Organizational Structures: A Case Study of T Town’s “Work Lines” [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(3): 39-50.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 67 -75 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 76 -80 .