Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (3): 75-84.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2023.03.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Minimalist Governance: the Implementation Path of Government Performance Management to Motivate Cadres to Take on Responsibilities —An Empirical Analysis Based on Guangxi Experience

HAO Guo-qiang, HE Yuan-kai   

  1. College of Ethnology and Sociology, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning 530000, China
  • Received:2022-10-11 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-07-11

Abstract: Performance management, born in governance practice, has been initially employed to assist decision-making, improve governance, and enhance the role of cadres. However, in practice, cadres are trapped in “red-taped” performance indicators and fall into the performance paradox of “being governed by performance”. In this context, it is necessary to reflect on the value of the “Occam's Razor” in performance management. The article is based on the analysis of Guangxi experience of government performance management in motivating cadres. It is found that current measures adopted, such as simplifying the procedure, identifying accurate targets, and focusing the performance, are in line with minimalist governance. There, across China, in general have been cumbersome and unscientific evaluation systems, unclear and multi-directional incentives, and overloaded and imperfect evaluation systems, complex and inflexible methods and the like, challenges that renders Guangxi experience, i.e. minimalist governance, very essential to motivate cadres to take on responsibilities. To be more specific, the article finds, we should adopt a streamlined indicator system, strengthen positive incentives, improve management efficiency, and optimize evaluation methods.

Key words: minimalist governance, government performance management, cadres take on responsibilities, positive motivation

CLC Number:  D035
[1] 何文盛,蔡泽山,杜丽娜.公共政策绩效损失的实证分析——以G省农业水价综合改革政策为例[J].北京行政学院学报,2021(1):36-44.
[2] 张乾友.“被指标治理”模式的生成及其治理逻辑[J].探索与争鸣,2021(2):107-116,179+181.
[3] 黄宗智.集权的简约治理——中国以准官员和纠纷解决为主的半正式基层行政[J].开放时代,2008(2):10-29.
[4] 任剑涛. 国家治理的简约主义[J].开放时代,2010(7):73-86.
[5] 周雪光.权威体制与有效治理:当代中国国家治理的制度逻辑[J].开放时代,2011(10):67-85.
[6] 史云贵,薛喆.简约治理:概念内涵、生成逻辑与影响因素[J].中国人民大学学报,2022(1):149-159.
[7] 狄金华,钟涨宝.从主体到规则的转向——中国传统农村的基层治理研究[J].社会学研究,2014(5):73-97+242.
[8] 上官莉娜,侯寓栋.当前我国行政服务“简约化”治理的实践与困境——以北京市海淀区为例[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2019(2):131-137.
[9] 欧阳静.简约治理:超越科层化的乡村治理现代化[J].中国社会科学,2022(3):145-163+207.
[10] 蔡立辉.西方国家政府绩效评估的理念及其启示[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(1):76-84.
[11] 周志忍.政府绩效管理研究:问题、责任与方向[J].中国行政管理,2006(12):13-15.
[12] 马亮.大数据时代的政府绩效管理[J].理论探索,2020(6):14-22.
[13] 石亚军,程广鑫.区块链+政务服务:以数据共享优化政务服务的技术赋能[J].北京行政学院学报,2020(6):50-56.
[1] OU-Yang Jing. What is Minimalist Governance? [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(2): 86-95.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!