Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (2): 42-58.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2024.02.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the Collaborative Impact Mechanism of Enterprise Digital Transformation and Government Digital Governance on the Innovation “Improvement in Both Quantity and Quality”

WU Wei-hong, QIN Zhen, ZHANG Ai-mei, LIU Ying   

  1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2023-10-26 Published:2024-04-02

Abstract: Based on the digital empowerment theory, this paper takes 396 high-tech manufacturing listed companies from 2016 to 2021 as samples, and explores the mechanism of enterprise digital transformation and government digital governance empowering enterprise innovation “improvement in both quantity and quality” from the micro and macro dimensions; it employs polynomial regression, response surface analysis and block variable analysis to analyze its interaction and coordination mechanism, and clarifies the multidimensional paths of digital economy in promoting the “quantity and quality” of enterprise innovation. The research results show that: (1) The digital transformation of enterprises significantly promotes the “quantity”, instead of “quality” of enterprise innovation; government digital governance significantly enhances the both. (2) There is an interactive synergy between enterprise digital transformation and government digital governance, which significantly promotes the “quantity and quality” of enterprise innovation; in a balanced state, i.e. when the two are at a double-high level, enterprise innovation performance is better, and in a non-balanced state, the “leading logic” of government digital governance is presented. (3) It further verifies that the interactive collaboration between government and enterprises can promote the “quantity and quality” of enterprise innovation by reducing enterprise management transaction costs and alleviating the information asymmetry. The conclusion enriches the research on digital economy and enterprise innovation, provides a new path for enterprises to get out of the dilemma of quality-biased innovation, and offers a new reference for government departments to implement the digital economy policy and optimize the innovation environment.

Key words: enterprise digital transformation, government digital governance, improvement in quantity and quality, interactive collaboration

CLC Number:  F120.3
[1] 池毛毛,王俊晶,王伟军.数字化转型背景下企业创新绩效的影响机制研究——基于NCA与SEM的混合方法[J].科学学研究,2022(2):319-331.
[2] Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019,28(2):118-144.
[3] 阳银娟,陈劲,叶臻.企业数字化转型对创新的影响研究[J].创新科技,2020(6):35-41.
[4] 蔡跃洲.中国共产党领导的科技创新治理及其数字化转型——数据驱动的新型举国体制构建完善视角[J].管理世界,2021(8):30-46.
[5] 张国胜,杜鹏飞.数字化转型对我国企业技术创新的影响:增量还是提质?[J].经济管理,2022(6):82-96.
[6] 廖福崇.数字治理体系建设:要素、特征与生成机制[J].行政管理改革,2022(7):84-92.
[7] 刘飞,王欣亮.政府数字化转型与地方治理绩效:治理环境作用下的异质性分析[J].中国行政管理,2021(11):75-84.
[8] 万相昱,蔡跃洲,张晨.数字化建设能够提高政府治理水平吗[J].学术研究,2021(10):94-99.
[9] 杨震宁,侯一凡,李德辉,等.中国企业“双循环”中开放式创新网络的平衡效应——基于数字赋能与组织柔性的考察[J].管理世界,2021(11):184-205.
[10] Gaglio C, Kraemer-mbula E, Lorenz E. The effects of digital transformation on innovation and productivity: firm-level evidence of South African manufacturing micro and small enterprises[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 182: 121785.
[11] 张振刚,许亚敏,罗泰晔.大数据时代企业动态能力对价值链重构路径的影响——基于格力电器的案例研究[J].管理评论,2021(3):339-352.
[12] 肖静华,吴小龙,谢康,等.信息技术驱动中国制造转型升级——美的智能制造跨越式战略变革纵向案例研究[J].管理世界,2021(3):161-179.
[13] Ciriello R F, Richter A, Schwabe G. Digital innovation[J]. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2018, 60(6): 563-569.
[14] 姚迈新.政企合作视阈下数字化社会治理:风险识别及其化解[J].行政与法,2022(8):33-43.
[15] 刘飞,王欣亮.政府数字化转型与地方治理绩效:治理环境作用下的异质性分析[J].中国行政管理,2021(11):75-84.
[16] 戴祥玉,卜凡帅.地方政府数字化转型的治理信息与创新路径——基于信息赋能的视角[J].电子政务,2020(5):101-111.
[17] 蒋余浩,贾开.区块链技术路径下基于大数据的公共决策责任机制变革研究[J].电子政务,2018(2):26-35.
[18] 马述忠,郭继文.数字经济时代的全球经济治理:影响解构、特征刻画与取向选择[J].改革,2020(11):69-83.
[19] 罗序斌,黄亮.中国制造业高质量转型升级水平测度与省际比较——基于“四化”并进视角[J].经济问题,2020(12):43-52.
[20] 王孟嘉.数字政府建设的价值、困境与出路[J].改革,2021(4):136-145.
[21] 尹振涛,陈媛先,徐建军.平台经济的典型特征、垄断分析与反垄断监管[J].南开管理评论,2022(3):213-226.
[22] 杨运杰,毛宁,尹志锋.混合所有制改革能否提升中国国有企业的创新水平[J].经济学家,2020(12):71-79.
[23] Frynas J G, Mol M J, Mellahi K. Management innovation made in China: Haier’s Rendanheyi[J]. California Management Review, 2018, 61(1): 71-93.
[24] 王晓晓,黄海刚,夏友富.数字化政府建设与企业创新[J].财经科学,2021(11):118-132.
[25] 余东华.制造业高质量发展的内涵、路径与动力机制[J].产业经济评论,2020(1):13-32.
[26] 戴祥玉,卜凡帅.地方政府数字化转型的治理信息与创新路径——基于信息赋能的视角[J].电子政务,2020(5):101-111.
[27] 石青梅,孙梦娜,谢香兵.关键审计事项披露与企业创新质量——基于信息不对称下的融资约束视角[J].会计与经济研究,2022(4):19-40.
[28] 张杰,郑文平.创新追赶战略抑制了中国专利质量么?[J].经济研究,2018(5):28-41.
[29] 陈强远,林思彤,张醒.中国技术创新激励政策:激励了数量还是质量[J].中国工业经济,2020(4):79-96.
[30] 吴非,胡慧芷,林慧妍,等.企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J].管理世界,2021(7):130-144.
[31] 邓雪琳.改革开放以来中国政府职能转变的测量——基于国务院政府工作报告(1978-2015)的文本分析[J].中国行政管理,2015(8):30-36.
[32] 曹亦寒. 十八大以来我国国家层面数字治理政策文本的量化研究[D].杭州:浙江大学公共管理学院,2021.
[33] 雷鸿竹,王 谦.中国地方政府数字经济政策文本的量化研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2022(5):91-94.
[34] 张美萍. 政策工具视角下我国数字经济政策研究——基于省级政府政策文本的内容分析[J]. 理论建设, 2021(3):8.
[35] 金环,魏佳丽,于立宏.网络基础设施建设能否助力企业转型升级——来自“宽带中国”战略的准自然实验[J].产业经济研究,2021(6):73-86.
[36] 于蔚,汪淼军,金祥荣.政治关联和融资约束:信息效应与资源效应[J].经济研究,2012(9):125-139.
[37] Larry E Toothaker. Multiple Regression: testing and interpreting interactions[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45(1): 119-120.
[38] 万文海,刘龙均.员工与用户内外协同对平台企业创新绩效的影响:基于价值共创视角[J].南开管理评论,2021(2):72-84.
[39] Edwards J R, Cable D M. The value of value congruence[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2009, 94(3): 654.
[40] 赵涛,张智,梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2020(10):65-76.
[41] 袁淳,肖土盛,耿春晓,等.数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化[J].中国工业经济,2021(9):137-155.
[42] 邓达,潘光曦,林晓乐.我国数字经济发展对地方财政可持续性的影响[J].当代财经,2021(9):38-52.
[43] 何帆,刘红霞.数字经济视角下实体企业数字化变革的业绩提升效应评估[J].改革,2019(4):137-148.
[44] 赵涛,张智,梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2020(10):65-76.
[45] 韦欣.数字治理领域的政企合作及风险应对[J].求索,2022(3):182-188.
[1] XIANG Chao, BAO Li-ping, WANG Xiao-hua. Integrated Development of Digital Economy and Rural Economy: Theoretical Care, Policy Review and Practical Path [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(6): 120-132.
[2] CAO Xiao-jing, SUN Yi-ming, WANG Can. The Impact of the Digital Economy on the High-Quality Development of China’s Economy [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(2): 120-135.
[3] SHEN Jun-xi, WANG Lei. Income Distribution, Consumption Upgrading and Development of Strategic Emerging Industries under the Background of Common Prosperity [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(2): 136-154.
[4] WANG Xiao-hua, CHENG Lin. Digital Inclusive Finance and the Urban-Rural Income Gap: Opportunity or Divide [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(5): 127-146.
[5] TIAN Zheng, LI Xin. Research on the Path of High-quality Economic Growth in the Condition of Dual Circulation: Japan’s Experience and Enlightenment [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(3): 130-142.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 67 -75 .