Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2015, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (4): 126-130.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2015.04.021

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Construction of Human-oriented Performance Appraisal System for Teachers in Colleges and Universities

Huang Hai-bo   

  1. Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
  • Received:2015-01-16 Online:2015-07-10 Published:2018-12-18

Abstract: In the near future, human-oriented performance appraisal system for teachers in colleges and universities will be built. The system applies the philosophy of humanist management into practice, and is consistent with human nature and the law of education development. It is characterized by spontaneity, spiritual value, dialogic value and results with easy acceptance. The following are some approaches for such a performance appraisal system to make the guideline clear and form the culture of human-oriented performance to involve the third party in the assessment and use multiple appraisal methods; to encourage the appraisal objects to participate in the process of assessment so as to change the passive self-observation into the active one; and to open the feedback and explanation of the results. At the same time, relevant systems, such as external supervisory mechanism, mechanism of appealing and motivation mechanism, should be established as the guarantee of the system.

Key words: teachers in colleges and universities, performance assessment, humanism, management mechanism

CLC Number: 

  • G647
[1] 钟熠,杨泽泉.论大学管理中的人本主义[J].云南民族大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2009(6).
[2] Nicholas Bunnin ,Jiyuan Yu. The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy[M].Malden: Blackwell Publishing,2004.
[3] 李翔宇,游腾芳.“证实”与“证伪”方法在霍桑实验中的运用探析[J].广西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2012(6).
[4] 李翔宇,游腾芳,郑鸿.人类学方法在霍桑实验中的应用[J].广西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2013(3).
[5] 杰克·贝蒂.管理大师德鲁克[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,1999.
[6] 彼得·德鲁克.管理—— 任务、责任、实践[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1987.
[7] 马克斯·韦伯.新教伦理与资本主义精神[M].上海:三联书店,1987.
[8] 刘力永.如何理解唯物主义和唯心主义的历史贡献[J].广西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2013(2).
[9] Immanuel Kant.Ground work of the metaphysics of morals[M].New York:Harper Torchbooks,1964.
[10] [美]桑德拉·黑贝尔斯,理查德·威沃尔二世.有效沟通(第7版)[M].李业昆,译.北京:华夏出版社,2005.
[11] 李长华.美国高校教师绩效评价的特征及其启示[J].高教领导参考,2010(18).
[12] 毕妍,齐海涵.英国教师绩效工资制:缘起、特点及启示[J].现代教育管理,2012(1).
[13] 王克君.美国高校教师绩效评价体系及对我国的启示[J].东北大学学报:社会科学版,2013(6).
[14] 葛新斌,姜英敏.日本大学教师评估制度改革动向分析[J].比较教育研究,2004(9).
[15] 刘雪.韩国教师评价系统现状、展望的比较与启示[J].世界教育信息,2006(10).
[16] 吴慧平.法国大学治理变革的调适策略[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2009(3).
[1] TANG Zheng-dong. The Division of Capital and Labor under the Condition of Private Ownership and Its Irrationality——Young Engels’ Thoughts on Labor-Management Relations and Their Evaluation [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(1): 1-10.
[2] HOU Hui-hong, SU De. Public-funded Policy for Normal Students in China: A Return to Rational Balance——From the Perspective of Humanism [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(5): 78-87.
[3] ZHENG Zhen-feng. The Construction of Multiple Support System for Professional Development of Teachers in Colleges and Universities in Ethnic Areas Based on Stakeholder Theory [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(3): 111-115.
[4] ZHENG Zhen-feng. The Construction of Multiple Support System for Professional Development of Teachers in Colleges and Universities in Ethnic Areas Based on Stakeholder Theory [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(3): 116-121.
[5] HUANG Hai-bo. The Scientization of Teachers’ Performance Appraisal Index Systemin Colleges and Universities: Focusing on Colleges and Universities’ Internal Balanced Development [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(2): 115-120.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .