Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 44-49.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2019.02.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Logic of Alienated Labor and Its Liberation ——Two Different Theoretical Approaches Employed in Marx’s Paris Manuscripts

YOU Xin-wei   

  1. Graduate School of Economics and Business, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0809, Japan
  • Received:2018-06-20 Online:2019-03-25 Published:2019-04-26

Abstract: In order to deal with the problem that lies in the theory of alienated labor in the first manuscript of Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts, Marx developed two theoretical approaches in his Paris Manuscripts. In Comments on James Mill, Marx complemented the theory of alienated labor by adopting his theory of communication alienation as it well coped with the dynamic process of interaction between labor and capitalistic private property. However, it is such a theoretical framework integrating alienated labor with the process of circulation that may suppress the subjectivity of labor which definitely lead to labor’s approach and shift to alienation. In the third note of Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts, Marx reinterpreted labor and its alienation based on the perceptual philosophy and spoke highly of industrial labor of capitalism, in which labor might liberate itself from alienation on the base of richness of sensuousness. In this way available in Marx’s Paris Manuscript are the two different theoretical approaches, which constitute the theoretical interpretation of early Marxist Philosophy.

Key words: alienated labor, private property, sensuousness, liberation

CLC Number: 

  • A121
[1] 马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,2000.
[2] 韩立新.马克思的异化劳动理论究竟是不是循环论证[J].学术月刊,2012(3):58-68.
[3] 姜海波.私有财产的起源与外化劳动——解读《1844年经济学哲学手稿》笔记本I[J].马克思主义与现实,2008(1):69-75.
[4] 韩立新.评日本的“早期马克思论争”——兼论《穆勒评注》对重构马克思异化论的意义[J].哲学研究,2010(9):31-40.
[5] 宇野弘藏.資本論に学ぶ[M].ちくま学芸文庫,2015.
[6]李彬彬.马克思共产主义思想的起源——重新思考“巴黎手稿”对共产主义的七条论证[J].马克思主义与现实,2013(3):138-145.
[1] WANG Sheng-yu. On the “Capital Logic” of Marx’s Dimension of Human Science [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(6): 30-34.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .