Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 19-28.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2023.06.003

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Modern Construction of Hybrid Village Level Governance—A Case Stud y Based on Xicun Village in North Guangdong

LI Feng, LV De-wen   

  1. School of Sociology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Received:2023-05-27 Online:2023-11-15 Published:2023-12-22

Abstract: With the distribution of resources, supervision service, and the streamlined administration inclining to the rural areas, village level governance has entered the path of modern construction. Xicun Village has constructed a hybrid governance system by fully employing modern national governance rules and traditional governance resources. The village committees have recruited activists and clan elders, and formed a diversified governance pattern through formal, semi-formal, and informal governance methods. Village cadres are gradually becoming administrative, mainly responsible for routine tasks, and official documents and correspondence about core works; activists in the village, as semi-formal personnel, are responsible for mobilizing and coordinating the masses to complete the central work; the elderly association manages social affairs through local authoritative organizations. The division of labor and cooperation among diverse governance entities has shaped a hierarchical operational mechanism for village level governance, which includes “top-level coordination, intermediate transformation, and bottom mobilization”. Hybrid village level governance, as it is based on the optional organizational structures and diverse legal resources, and adopts classified governance according to the nature of affairs, well integrates the tradition of minimalist governance into the modernization of national governance construction, thus achieving the “governance with actions”, and shaping a modern minimalist governance model that takes into account both legitimacy and effectiveness.

Key words: minimalist governance, village-level governance, mixed organizations, modernization of governance, elderly association

CLC Number:  C915
[1] 贺雪峰.行政还是自治:村级治理向何处去[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019(6):1-5,159.
[2] 欧阳静.简约治理:超越科层化的乡村治理现代化[J].中国社会科学,2022(3):145-163,207.
[3] 贺雪峰.村级治理的变迁、困境与出路[J].思想战线,2020(4):129-136.
[4] 雷望红.行政嵌套自治与现代简约治理[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023(3):116-126.
[5] 黄宗智.集权的简约治理——中国以准官员和纠纷解决为主的半正式基层行政[J].开放时代,2008(2):10-29.
[6] [美]杜赞奇.文化、权力与国家:1900—1942年的华北农村[M].王福明,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2022:38-40.
[7] 张乐天.告别理想——人民公社制度研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2021.
[8] 张厚安.乡政村治—— 中国特色的农村政治模式[J].政策,1996(8):26-28.
[9] 贺雪峰.试论20世纪中国乡村治理的逻辑[J].中国乡村研究,2007(1):157-173.
[10] 折晓叶,陈婴婴.项目制的分级运作机制和治理逻辑——对“项目进村”案例的社会学分析[J].中国社会科学,2011(4):126-148,223.
[11] 李祖佩,钟涨宝.论村级治理行政化——以乡镇政府中心工作推进为切入点的分析[J].农业经济问题,2020(10):68-79.
[12] 吕德文.监督下乡与基层超负:基层治理合规化及其意外后果[J].公共管理与政策评论,2022(1):34-42.
[13] 贺雪峰,郑晓园.监督下乡与基层治理的难题[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021(2):10-18.
[14] 周飞舟.从汲取型政权到“悬浮型”政权——税费改革对国家与农民关系之影响[J].社会学研究,2006(3):1-38,243.
[15] 刘锐.治理困境背景下乡镇形式主义的生成逻辑[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2021(2):26-35.
[16] 赵晓峰.“行政消解自治”:理解税改前后乡村治理性危机的一个视角[J].长白学刊,2011(1):73-78.
[17] 吕德文.“混合型”科层组织的运作机制——临时工现象的制度解释[J].开放时代,2019(6):130-147.
[18] 印子.村级治理行政化的演化过程与治理效果——基于苏北C镇调研的分析[J].求实,2020(4):82-96,112.
[19] 赵秀玲.中国传统乡村治理资源的现代转换[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020(2):17-21.
[20] 王海娟.项目制与农村公共品供给“最后一公里”难题[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015(4):62-67.
[21] 吴毅.小镇喧嚣——一个乡镇政治运作的演绎与阐释[M].北京:读书·生活·新知三联书店出版社,2022:69-70.
[22] 费孝通.乡土中国 生育制度[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2021:64-65.
[23] 吕德文.乡村振兴背景下乡村工作共同体的建构逻辑[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021(5):78-86.
[24] 欧阳静.简约治理是什么[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023(2):86-95.
[1] HAO Guo-qiang, HE Yuan-kai. Minimalist Governance: the Implementation Path of Government Performance Management to Motivate Cadres to Take on Responsibilities —An Empirical Analysis Based on Guangxi Experience [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(3): 75-84.
[2] OU-Yang Jing. What is Minimalist Governance? [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(2): 86-95.
[3] MA Liang. An Overall Arrangement for China's Governance: How to Transform Institutional Advantages into Governance Performance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 1-12.
[4] Wang Bing-quan, Peng Chong. Observation of Formalism: An Organizational Perspective [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 136-147.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .