Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (4): 49-54.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2017.04.008
Previous Articles Next Articles
FAN Zhong-yuan
CLC Number:
[1] 张赪.类型学视野下的汉语名量词演变史[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012. [2] 李霞.仡佬语中的一个泛用量词[J].广西大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2015(2). [3] 杨再彪.湘西苗语与汉语个体量词“个”用法比较[M]//李锦芳,等.汉藏语系量词研究.北京:中央民族大学出版社,2005. [4] [日]桥本万太郎.语言地理类型学[M].余志鸿,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1985. [5] Craig,C A. Classifier Languages[M]//Asher(ed.). The Encyclopedia of language and Linguistics,Volume2.Pergamon press,1994. [6] 蒋颖.汉藏语系语言名量词比较研究[M].北京:民族出版社,2009. [7] 《中国少数民族语言简志》编委会,《中国少数民族语言简志丛书》编委会.中国少数民族语言简志丛书修订本(卷壹—卷陆)[M].北京:民族出版社,2009. [8] Kiyomi,S. Animateness and shape in classifiers[J]. Word: Journal of the International Linguistic Association, 1992(43). [9] Aikhenhaid,A Y. Classifiers and Noun Classes:Semantic[M]//Asher(ed). The Encyciopedia of Language and Linguistics,Volum 2.Pergamon Press, 2006. [10] Croft,Willian. Semantic universals in classifier systems[J]. Word: Journal of the International Linguistic Association, 1994(21). [11] Tai,James H-Y and Lianqing Wang. A semantic study of the classier tiao[J].Journal of Chinses Language Teacher Association, 1990(1). [12] 朱德熙.语法讲义[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982. [13] 胡素华,沙志军.彝语与缅语类别量词的语义比较[M]//李锦芳,等.汉藏语系量词研究.北京:中央民族大学出版社,2005. [14] 蒋颖.汉藏语系名量词研究[D].北京:中央民族大学中国少数民族语言文学学院,2006. [15] 戴庆厦,李洁.勒期语概况[J].民族语文,2006(1). [16] 徐世旋.毕苏语研究[M].上海:上海远东出版社,1998. [17] 李霞,李锦芳,姜莉芳.居都仡佬语量词与汉语量词对比分析[M]//李锦芳,等.汉藏语系量词研究.北京:中央民族大学出版社,2005. [18] 周祖瑶.瑶族布努话的量词[J].贵州民族研究,1984(3). [19] 徐悉坚.载瓦语的量词[J].民族语文,1993(4). [20] 刘大为.流行语的隐喻性语义泛化[J].汉语学习,1997(4). [21] 刘世儒.魏晋南北朝量词研究[M].北京:中华书局,1965. |
[1] | . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 67-75. |
[2] | . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 81-88. |
[3] | . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 103-108. |
[4] | ZONG Shou-yun. Semantic Characteristic of “Dao” and Difference among “Dao”, “Tiao” and “Gen” [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(2): 77-82. |