广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 67-78.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2026.03.008

• 教育科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

教育智能体的安全风险研判及应对策略

吴砥, 冯倩怡, 陈旭   

  1. 华中师范大学人工智能教育学部,湖北武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-17 出版日期:2026-05-05 发布日期:2026-04-27
  • 作者简介:吴砥,华中师范大学人工智能教育学部教授,博士生导师,研究方向:人工智能教育、数字素养;冯倩怡,华中师范大学人工智能教育学部博士研究生,研究方向:人工智能教育;陈旭,华中师范大学人工智能教育学部副研究员,博士生导师,研究方向:人工智能教育。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“教育数字化转型的国际比较研究”(22JZD045)

Identifying and Addressing Security Risks of Educational Agents

WU Di, FENG Qian-yi, CHEN Xu   

  1. Faculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Received:2025-12-17 Online:2026-05-05 Published:2026-04-27

摘要: 随着生成式人工智能技术的爆发式迭代,智能体在教育领域的应用越来越广泛,随之产生的伦理问题值得关注。基于智能体应用和监管的角度,智能体在教育场景应用中的风险表征包括教学过程风险、学习评价风险、数据内容风险和监管治理风险,其风险产生的原因主要包括技术民主化趋势、规则体系短板和师生素养不足。制定科学的风险规避策略,需要系统梳理比较各国际组织、国家和高校发布的有关教育人工智能应用的原则、规范、指南等文件内容,从技术治理、制度建设、能力强化、价值坚守四个方面考虑,具体策略为:构建可信、透明与可控系统;完备准入、分级与备案制度;提升师生人工智能协同能力;确保教育智能体以人为本。

关键词: 教育智能体, 生成式人工智能, 人工智能风险, 人工智能伦理

Abstract: With the explosive iteration of generative artificial intelligence technology, the application of agents in education is becoming increasingly widespread, and the resulting ethical issues deserve attention. From the perspectives of agent application and regulation, risks in educational scenarios-spanning the teaching process, learning assessment, data content, and regulatory governance-stem primarily from the trend toward technological democratization, shortcomings in the regulatory system, and insufficient literacy among teachers and students. To formulate scientific risk-mitigation strategies, it is necessary to systematically review and compare principles, norms, and guidelines issued by international organizations, national governments, and universities concerning the application of AI in education. Strategies should be structured from four pillars: technical governance, institutional development, capacity building, and value adherence. Concrete measures include: building trustworthy, transparent, and controllable systems; improving access, grading, and filing systems; enhancing the AI collaboration capability of teachers and students; and ensuring that educational agents remain human-centered.

Key words: educational agent, generative artificial intelligence, AI risk, AI ethics

中图分类号:  G434

[1] 尚俊杰, 何奕霖, 刘誉. 生成式人工智能赋能教师发展的价值与途径[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2026, 62(1): 88-97.
[2] 郑志峰, 陈静. 生成式人工智能标识义务的主体界定与适用路径[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 61(5): 69-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发