广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (5): 21-36.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2022.05.003

• • 上一篇    下一篇

国家治理现代化的政治认知基础——基于中国网民和大学生的实证分析

马得勇, 黄敏璇   

  1. 中国人民大学 国际关系学院,北京 100872
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-30 出版日期:2022-09-15 发布日期:2022-11-10
  • 作者简介:马得勇,中国人民大学国际关系学院教授,博士生导师,研究方向:政治心理与政治传播;黄敏璇,中国人民大学国际关系学院博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目“政治心理学视野下的政治传播研究”(2020030012)

The Political Cognitive Basis of the Modernization of National Governance—An Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Netizens and College Students

MA De-yong, HUANG Min-xuan   

  1. School of International Studies, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
  • Received:2022-03-30 Online:2022-09-15 Published:2022-11-10

摘要: 现代国家治理要求民众具备较高的政治知识素养与政治认知能力,盲从的公民可能导致公共政策非理性化和舆论空间的失衡。在社会心理学中,“达克效应”被用来揭示“无知者更自信”的过度自信现象。以中国普通网民和中国大学生为调查对象,对中国民众的政治认知能力进行统计分析,结果表明:相较于大学生群体,中国网民群体政治认知水平较低,对自身的实际政治知识水平的认知也存在偏差,政治认知能力越低的网民越倾向于认为自身的政治知识水平高于平均水平,政治认知能力越高的网民则越倾向于低估自身政治知识水平。总体而言,中国普通民众在政治领域存在“达克效应”现象,认知闭合、威权人格与过度自信存在显著的相关性,可部分解释过度自信的来源。社交媒体在拓宽大众参政议政渠道的新形势下如何提高部分民众的政治认知能力成为新时代中国国家治理亟待解决的难题。

关键词: 过度自信, 达克效应, 政治知识, 政治能力, 现代国家治理

Abstract: To pursue modern national governance, its citizens are supposed to equip with high political knowledge literacy and political cognitive ability as ignorant and blind citizens may mislead decision-makes to adopt irrational public policies and create an imbalanced public opinion space. The “D-K effect”, employed in social psychology to reveal the overconfidence phenomenon that “the ignorant are more confident”, is adopted in this study with Chinese ordinary netizens and Chinese college students as the survey objects, to make a statistical analysis on the political cognitive ability of the Chinese people. The results show that:1) compared with the latter, the former has a lower level of political cognition; 2) there are also gaps in their cognition of their own actual political knowledge: netizens with lower political cognition tend to overestimate while these with higher political cognition tend to underestimate their own political knowledge. Generally speaking, “D-K effect” is commonly available in the political field and there is a significant correlation between cognitive closure, authoritarian personality and overconfidence, which can partly explain the source of overconfidence. How to improve the political cognitive ability of some people under the new situation of broadening the channels for the public to participate in and discuss politics has become an urgent problem for China’s national governance in the new era, this paper finds.

Key words: over-confidence, D-K effect, political knowledge, political ability, modern national governance

中图分类号: 

  • D621
[1] 习近平.决胜全面建成小康社会 夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2017.
[2] 俞可平. 论国家治理现代化[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2015.
[3] [美]罗伯特D·帕特南.使民主运转起来[M].王列,赖海榕, 等译.南昌:江西人民出版社,2001.
[4] 习近平.中国的民主是一种全过程的民主[EB/OL].(2019-11-03)[2021-03-16]http://cpc.people.com.cn/n1/2019/1103/c64094-31434694.html.
[5] Kruger J, Dunning D.Unskilled and unaware of it:how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments[J].Journal of personality and social psychology,1999, 77 (6): 1121-1134.
[6] Neisser U. Cognitive psychology: classic edition[M].New York: Psychology Press,2014.
[7] Cimpian A, Salomon E.The inherence heuristic: an intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism[J].Behavioraland Brain Sciences,2014, 37 (5): 461-80.
[8] Klayman J.Varieties of confirmation bias[J].The Psychology of Learning and Motivation,1995, 32 (1): 385-418.
[9] Steel D.Wishful thinking and values in science[J].Philosophy of Science,2018, 85 (5): 895-905.
[10] Mercier H, Sperber D.Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory[J].Behavioral and Brain Sciences,2011, 34 (2): 57-74.
[11] Buehler R, Griffin D, Ross M.Exploring the “planning fallacy”:why people underestimate their task completion times[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1994, 67 (3): 366-381.
[12] Moore D A, Healy P J.The trouble with overconfidence[J].Psychological Review,2008, 115 (2): 502-517.
[13] Dunning D, Johnson K, Ehrlinger J, et al.Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence[J].Psychological Science,2003, 12 (3): 83-87.
[14] Flavell J H.Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry[J].American psychologist,1979, 34 (10): 906-911.
[15] Ehrlinger J, Johnson K, Banner M, et al.Why the unskilled are unaware: further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2008, 105 (1): 98-121.
[16] [英]迈克尔·斯卡平克.与FT共进午餐:管理大师曼弗雷德·凯茨·德弗里斯[EB/OL].[2021-03-11].http://www.ftchinese.com/story/001091750?full=y&archive.
[17] Ross L, Greene D, House P.The “false consensus effect”: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes[J].Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1977, 13 (3): 279-301.
[18] [美]加布里埃尔·A.阿尔蒙德,西德尼·维巴. 公民文化:五个国家的政治态度和民主制度[M].张明澍,译.北京:商务印书馆,2014.
[19] 罗峰. 公民政治素质折射政治文明的发展程度[J].探索与争鸣, 2002(10):18-20.
[20] Cramer K J, Toff B.The fact of experience: rethinking political knowledge and civic competence[J].Perspectives on Politics,2017, 15 (3): 754-770.
[21] Converse P E.The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964)[J].Critical Review,2006, 18 (1-3): 1-74.
[22] Ortoleva P, Snowberg E.Overconfidence in political behavior[J].American Economic Review,2015, 105 (2): 504-535.
[23] Anson I G.Partisanship, political knowledge, and the Dunning-Kruger Effect[J].Political Psychology,2018, 39 (5): 1173-1192.
[24] Olivares O J. Overconfidence and personality: do individual differences exist in the way people make confidence judgments?[D]. Unpublished Dissertation, Texas A&M University, 1993.
[25] Schaefer P S, Williams C C, Goodie A S, et al.Overconfidence and the Big Five[J].Journal of Research in Personality,2004, 38 (5): 473-480.
[26] 刘雪峰, 张志学.认知闭合需要研究评述[J].心理科学进展,2009(1):51-55.
[27] Dancey L, Sheagley G.Heuristics behaving badly: party cues and voter knowledge[J].American Journal of Political Science,2013, 57 (2): 312-325.
[28] Motta M, Callaghan T, Sylvester S.Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes[J].Social Science Medicine,2018, 211: 274-281.
[29] Lumbanraja A U. When officials don’t know what they don’t know: Dunning-Kruger Effect in the case of green budgeting for local government[C].2nd International Conference on Indonesian Economy and Development (ICIED 2017),2017: 100-111.
[30] Markus H R, Kitayama S.Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation[J].Psychological review,1991, 98 (2): 224-253.
[31] Anson I G. Partisanship, political knowledge, and the Dunning-Kruger Effect[J]. Political Psychology,2018, 39 (5): 1173-1192.
[32] Quinton, M, Geissel B. Good democracies need “good” citizens: citizen dispositions and the study of democratic quality[C]//Guasti P. Mansfeldová Z (eds). Democracy under stress: changing perspectives on democracy, governance and their measurement. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 2018:148.
[33] Luskin R C. Measuring Political Sophistication [J]. American Journal of Political Science,1987,31(4):856-899.
[34] Popkin S L, Dimock M A. Political knowledge and citizen competence[C]//Elkin S L, Edward S K(eds). Citizen competence and democratic institutions. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999:117-146.
[35] Carpini M X D, Keeter S.Measuring political knowledge: putting first things first[J].American Journal of Political Science,1993, 37 (4): 1179-1206.
[36] Schacter D L.Feeling of knowing in episodic memory[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,1983, 9 (1): 39-54.
[37] Robison J.Who knows? Question format and political knowledge[J].International Journal of Public Opinion Research,2015, 27 (1): 1-21.
[38] Adorno T.The authoritarian personality[M].NewYork: Harper and Brothers,1950.
[39] Altemeyer B.The authoritarians[M].Canada:University of Manitoba,2006.
[40] Feldman S. Enforcing social conformity: a theory of authoritarianism[J]. Political Psychology, 2003,24 (1):41-74.
[41] 刘子旻,时勘,万金,等.认知闭合需要研究梳理与未来走向[J].心理科学进展,2018(4):688-697.
[42] 刘取芝,孙其昂,施春华,等.政治意识形态:影响因素、心理机制及作用[J].心理科学进展,2013,21(11):2073-2081.
[43] Bieber F.Is nationalism on the rise? assessing global trends[J].Ethnopolitics,2018, 17 (5): 519-540.
[44] [美]本尼迪克特·安德森.想象的共同体:民族主义的起源与散布[M]. 吴叡人,译. 上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[45] Wenfang T, Benjamin D. Chinese nationalism and its political and social origins[J]. Journal of Contemporary China,2012,21(77):811-826.
[46] Gries P H,Qingmin Z, et al. Patriotism nationalism and China’s US policy: structures and consequences of Chinese national identity[J]. China Quarterly, 2011(205):1-17.
[47] 马得勇,陆屹洲.信息接触、威权人格、意识形态与网络民族主义——中国网民政治态度形成机制分析[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(3):180-192.
[48] 郑永年.技术赋权:中国的互联网、国家与社会[M]. 邱道隆,译.上海:东方出版社,2014.
[49] 马得勇, 张志原.公共舆论的同质化及其心理根源——基于网民调查的实证分析[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(4):174-190,195.
[50] [美]托马斯·M. 尼科尔斯. 专家之死:反智主义的盛行及其影响[M]. 舒琦,译.北京:中信出版社,2019.
[51] Beattie P. Social evolution, political psychology, and the media in democracy the invisible hand in the U.S. marketplace of ideas [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan,2019.
[1] 卓越, 罗敏. 制度优势如何转化为治理效能?——基于比较分析的视角[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 57(6): 10-20.
[2] 曾楠. 制度认同:政治认同的制度基础构建[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 51(6): 63-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 蓝江. 当代西方数字资本主义下的异化劳动批判——从《1844年经济学哲学手稿》看当代数字劳动问题[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 58(5): 1 -10 .
[2] 庞金友. 数字秩序的“阿喀琉斯之踵”:当代数据治理的迷思与困境[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 58(5): 11 -20 .
[3] 于文轩, 魏炜. 数据的敏捷治理:价值重塑与框架构建[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 58(5): 37 -49 .
[4] 谢新水. 元宇宙中的内容生产者:生产境况与行动沼泽[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 58(5): 50 -61 .
[5] 张爱军, 贺晶晶. 元宇宙赋能数字政治主体:表现、风险与规制[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 58(5): 62 -71 .
[6] 锁利铭, 王雪. 城市智能化升级的复杂逻辑、耦合变迁与治理转型——以“城市大脑”实践为例[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 58(5): 72 -85 .
[7] 韩艺, 刘璨. 区块链赋能:“互联网+政务服务”运行中的数据安全治理之道[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 58(5): 86 -99 .
[8] 谭海波, 郭倚彤. 均衡与适配:地方政府数字经济政策的文献量化研究——基于政策“工具—偏好”的分析视角[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 58(5): 100 -116 .
[9] 汪建新, 张宇珂. 数据要素区域市场一体化合作机制与路径:产业链集群视角[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 58(5): 117 -126 .
[10] 王小华, 程琳. 数字普惠金融与城乡收入差距:机遇还是鸿沟[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 58(5): 127 -146 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发