广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (4): 40-51.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2026.04.005

• 治理现代化研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“活在原家庭”:农村搭伴养老的类型化实践与再生产机制

任亮亮1, 贺雪峰2   

  1. 1.湖北省社会科学院 社会学研究所, 湖北 武汉430077;
    2.武汉大学 社会学院, 湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-03 出版日期:2026-07-05 发布日期:2026-07-01
  • 作者简介:任亮亮,湖北省社会科学院社会学研究所助理研究员,研究方向:农村社会学、流动人口;贺雪峰,武汉大学社会学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向:基层治理、三农问题。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“农村社区治理创新问题研究”(22&ZD173)

“Living in the Original Family”: Typified Practices for Rural Companionship-based Elderly Care and Its Reproduction Mechanism

REN Liang-liang1, HE Xue-feng2   

  1. 1. Institute of Sociology, Hubei Academy of Social Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China;
    2. School of Sociology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Received:2025-09-03 Online:2026-07-05 Published:2026-07-01

摘要: 在我国农村社会转型与人口老龄化背景下,老年人“搭伴养老”现象逐渐凸显。基于对S县50位搭伴老人的实地调研访谈发现,该群体内部的关系模式可划分为亲密互动型、自主松散型和紧张依附型三种类型。作为一种策略性安排,老年人选择搭伴养老,并非意味着原家庭关系的解体或代际关系紧张,其生命价值与意义仍植根于原家庭,即“活在原家庭”。为实现“活在原家庭”的目标,搭伴老人采取一系列策略:同居不共财以实现经济资源的原家庭流动、恩往下流以实现物质资源的原家庭获得、契约式婚姻以实现责任与风险的原家庭绑定以及策略整合以实现情感慰藉需求的原家庭满足。此外,老年人可在搭伴家庭与原家庭之间自由流动,从而确保其在搭伴关系结束后仍可回归原家庭并接受子女赡养。这一“可退出”机制为搭伴养老模式的可持续再生产奠定了重要基础。搭伴养老既是家庭赡养伦理变迁与赡养能力不足背景下老年人积极自养的策略选择,也塑造了一种“剥离—一体”并存的代际关系新形态。同时,丧偶老人中的搭伴者只是少数,大多数人仍然依靠原家庭养老,因此应从提升家庭养老能力与系统构建农村养老服务体系两方面着手,积极应对农村人口老龄化带来的挑战。

关键词: 搭伴养老, 低龄老人, 代际关系, 互助养老, 人口老龄化

Abstract: Against the backdrop of rural social transformation and population aging in China, the phenomenon of elderly individuals engaging in “companionship-based elderly care” has gradually become prominent. Based on field research involving 50 elderly individuals in S County, the study finds that the relationship models within this group can be categorized into three types: intimate-interactive, autonomous-loose, and tense-dependent. As a strategic arrangement, the choice of companionship-based elderly care does not signify the disintegration of original family relationships or the intensification of inter-generational tensions. Instead, their life value and meaning of the elderly remain rooted in their original families. To achieve the goal of “living within the original family”, elderly individuals in companionship arrangements adopt a series of strategies: living together without shared finances to facilitate the flow of economic resources to the original family; directing benefits downward to secure material resources from the original family; utilizing contractual marriage to bind responsibilities and risks to the original family; and integrating strategies to satisfy emotional needs within the original family. Additionally, elderly individuals can move freely between the companionship household and their original family, ensuring they can return to the original family and receive support from their children after the companionship ends. This “exit-available” mechanism provides a crucial basis for the sustainable reproduction of the partnership elderly care model. Companionship-based elderly care, driven by changes in family support ethics and insufficient family support capacity, not only serves as a strategic choice for active self-care among the elderly, but also shapes a new form of inter-generational relations characterized by the coexistence of “separation-integration”. While some adopt it as a strategic arrangement, the majority continue to rely on the original family for support. Consequently, addressing the challenges of population aging requires a dual approach-enhancing the capacity of family-based care while systematically developing a comprehensive rural elder care service system.

Key words: companionship-based elderly care, younger-aged elderly, inter-generational relations, mutual support elderly care, population aging

中图分类号:  C912.3

[1] 黄石松, 胡清. 人口老龄化新态势对共同富裕的多维影响及政策优化[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2026, 62(4): 28-39.
[2] 王欢明, 钟峥云. 社会支持视角下农村老年人互助养老行为及影响因素研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 60(2): 59-74.
[3] 刘俊杰, 高莹. 人口流动对人口老龄化的区域影响——基于两广的对比分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 55(3): 78-87.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陈延斌, 王伟. 传统家礼文献整理、研究的学术史梳理与评析[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] 李冰, 陈姝瑾. 《郑氏家仪》研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] 朱莉涛. 《茗洲吴氏家典》研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] 张乾元, 朱倩倩. 习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的核心要旨[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[5] 潘瑾菁. 习近平新时代网络意识形态工作思想研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[6] 瞿久淞, 靳书君. 习近平新时代中国特色社会主义话语研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[7] 邓世平. 乡村振兴:习近平对毛泽东农村发展思想的继承与发展[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[8] 李潇. 完善我国人格权立法的再思考[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 55 -60 .
[9] 赛铮. 论保险公司破产是偏颇性清偿行为撤销之例外[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .
[10] 温锁林. 汉语中的非量化名词[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 54(3): 67 -75 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: xbgj@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发