Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 97-101.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2017.06.015

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Mixed Style of Sao and Qi as Transition from Shi to Wen in Wenxuan

SHAO Jie   

  1. College of Liberal Arts, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
  • Received:2017-03-22 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2018-07-13

Abstract: Styles in Wen Xuan have been classified into three main categories: Fu, Poem and Wen. However, Sao and Qi have no regular place in the classifications as their styles are particular. The styles in ancient Wen Xuan, which was presented by Japanese manuscript of Wen Xuan, were different from that in common editions after Song Dynasty as they have no Sao and Qi style but that of Lisao and Song. Maybe Wen Xuan has been compiled repeatedly that different setting systems have been used to defined style and the final version is what we can see nowadays. Sao and Qi were set between Shi and Poem in the broad sense as they possess characteristics of many styles. The order from shi (verse) to wen (prose) is the general principle for Wen Xuan to arrange its style. Sao and Qi are in the “intermediate zone”, so they belong to the mixed style which was used for transition. The dynamic changes of style deserved further academic research.

Key words: Sao, Qi, Wen Xuan, style

CLC Number: 

  • I207.2
[1] 刘师培.中国中古文学史讲义[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2000.
[2] 刘咸炘.文选序说[C]//推十书(增补全本).戊辑(第1册).上海:上海科学技术文献出版社,2009.
[3] 李立信.《昭明文选》分三体七十三类说[C]//中国《文心雕龙》学会.《文心雕龙》与21 世纪文论研究国际学术研讨会论文集.北京:学苑出版社,2009.
[4] 骆鸿凯.文选学[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2013.
[5] 傅刚.昭明文选研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.
[6] 王立群.《文选》次文类作家编序研究[J].文学评论,2004(3).
[7] 陈翀.萧统《文选》文体分类及其文体观考论:以“离骚”与“歌”体为中心[J].中华文史论丛,2011(1).
[8] 陈翀.再论唐末五代大规模刻书之可能性——以〈二中历〉所存〈文选篇目〉为例[C]//域外汉籍研究集刊:第八辑.北京:中华书局,2012.
[9] 萧统.文选[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
[10] 杨伯峻.春秋左传注(修订本)[M].北京:中华书局,1990.
[11] 邵杰.《楚辞》编纂体例“经传说”析论[C]//中国诗歌研究:第九辑.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013.
[12] 力之.《楚辞》与中古文献考说[M].成都:巴蜀书社,2005.
[13] 郭预衡.中国散文史(上)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2000.
[14] 刘永济.十四朝文学要略[M].北京:中华书局,2007.
[15] 范文澜.文心雕龙注[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1958.
[16] 班固.汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1962.
[17] 郭绍虞.照隅室古典文学论集(上编).上海:上海古籍出版社,1983.
[18] 程千帆.闲堂文薮[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1984.
[19] 胡大雷.从“诗笔之辨”到文体三分:论“赋”在南北朝的再发现与其文体学意义[J].文学遗产,2015(2).
[20] 邵杰.《诗》的隐显与《文选》“赋、诗、骚”的排序:《文选》序“体”研究之一[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(6).
[21] 吴承学.中国古代文体学研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2011.
[22] 蒋寅.中国古代文体互参中“以高行卑”的体位定势[J].中国社会科学,2008(5).
[23] 胡大雷.论中古文体的扩张、互动及非常态化[J].学术月刊,2012(9).
[1] HUANG Shu-xian, QIAN Meng-meng. A Brief Discussion of Duan-Wang Academic Style [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(5): 93-99.
[2] WU Da-shun. Cao Cao’s Imitation of Yue Fu and the Birth of Vigorous Style of Jian An [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(2): 77-83.
[3] LI Zhi. Dialectical Studies on Citations within Commentary on Titles and Authors of Credit Lines in Wen Xuan —— On Citations in Li Shan’s Commentary and “Five Officials Commentary” [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(6): 90-96.
[4] ZHANG Wen-dong. The Unbelievable “Negligence” ——A Study on A Centennial Review of Wen Xuan [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(6): 102-107.
[5] LI Sheng-long. Relationship between Differentiation of Writing Style of Pianwen and Its Sentential Style [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(5): 50-57.
[6] ZHANG Yan. The Style Discrimination of Parallel Prose and Prose inTuian Essays by Liang Zhangju and Its Significance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(5): 75-79.
[7] CHEN Jun. Collection of Articles of Various Styles and Stylistic Concept of Zhi Yu [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(5): 122-130.
[8] ZHANG Zuo-dong. From Si Liu to Parallel Prose: A Study on the Evolution of the Name of Parallel Prose and Style Discrimination [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(3): 99-107.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 1(1): 1 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 0, (): 1 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .