Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (6): 63-73.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2019.06.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Construction Effect of the New Land-sea Corridor in Western China:Connotation, Methods and Research Framework

YUAN Wei-yan   

  1. School of Economics and Management,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin 541004,China
  • Received:2019-07-28 Published:2020-01-17

Abstract: The effect evaluation is of great significance to the optimization of strategic control and the adjustment of strategic implementation. This paper, on the basis of a full discussion of the connotation, evaluation method and research framework of the construction effect of the new land-sea corridor in the west, holds that the construction effect can be interpreted both economically and socially. By adopting strategic evaluation methods available, the effect can be evaluated under the condition of correctly setting the index system and index weight. For enhancing the reference role of evaluation results in the decision-making of the corridor construction, the evaluation results, together with the features of spatial distribution and the trend of time evolution should be taken into consideration, while emphasizing the influencing factors, realization path and formation mechanism. For a full grasp of the construction effect, it is necessary to further explore the index system construction reflecting the construction process, the degree of effect realization, and the balance between different effects. And what’s more, a comprehensive view should be taken as the focus in the evaluation.

Key words: the new land - sea corridor in western China, connotation, effect evaluation, research framework

CLC Number: 

  • F123.16
[1] 张学良.中国交通基础设施促进了区域经济增长吗——兼论交通基础设施的空间溢出效应[J].中国社会科学,2012(3):60-77.
[2] 刘冲,刘晨冉,孙腾.交通基础设施、金融约束与县域产业发展——基于“国道主干线系统”自然实验的证据[J].管理世界,2019(7):78-88+203.
[3] 张满银.基于多层次模糊评价的国家级区域规划实施成效评估[J].统计与决策,2019(15):57-60.
[4] Krugman P.Geography and trade[M].The MIT Press,1991.
[5] Schumpeter J A.The theory of economic development:an inquiry into profits,capital,credit,interest and the business cycle[M].Harvard University Press,1934.
[6] 刘生龙,胡鞍钢.交通基础设施与经济增长:中国区域差距的视角[J].中国工业经济,2010(4):14-23.
[7] 王晓东,邓丹萱,赵忠秀.交通基础设施对经济增长的影响——基于省际面板数据与Feder模型的实证检验[J].管理世界,2014(4):173-174.
[8] 刘志彪,陈柳.长三角区域一体化发展的示范价值与动力机制[J].改革,2018(12):65-71.
[9] 国家发展改革委经济研究所课题组.推动经济高质量发展[J].宏观经济研究,2019(2):5-17+91.
[10] 刘志彪.理解高质量发展:基本特征、支撑要素与当前重点问题[J].学术月刊,2018,50(7):39-45+59.
[11] 金碚.关于“高质量发展”的经济学研究[J].中国工业经济,2018(4):5-18.
[12] 朱翠萍.“一带一路”倡议的南亚方向:地缘政治格局、印度难点与突破路径[J].南亚研究,2017(2):1-28+156.
[13] 赵向阳,李海,Rauch A.创业活动的国家(地区)差异:文化与国家(地区)经济发展水平的交互作用[J].管理世界,2012(8):78-90.
[14] 高翔,龙小宁.省级行政区划造成的文化分割会影响区域经济吗?[J].经济学(季刊),2016,15(2):647-674.
[15] 刘进宝.“丝绸之路”概念的形成及其在中国的传播[J].中国社会科学,2018(11):181-202.
[16] 李刚,程砚秋,董霖哲,王文君.基尼系数客观方法研究[J].管理评论,2014,26(1):12-22.
[17] Heckman J J,Ichimura H,Todd P E.Maching as an econometric evaluation estimator:evidecne from evaluating a job training programme[J].The Review of Economic Studies,1997,64(4):605-654.
[18] Rosenbaum P R,Rubin D B.The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects[J].Biometrika,1983,70(1):41-55.
[19] Shi H,Huang S Q.How much infrastructure is too much?A new approach and evidence from China[J]. World Development,2014,56:272-286.
[20] Tolston M T,Shockley K,Riley M A.Richardson M J.Movement constraints on interpersonal coordination and communication[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology,Human Perception& Performan,2014,40(5): 18-91.
[21] 周成,冯学钢,唐睿.区域经济—生态环境—旅游产业耦合协调发展分析与预测——以长江经济带沿线各省市为例[J].经济地理,2016,36(3):186-193.
[22] 傅为忠,金敏,刘芳芳.工业4.0背景下我国高技术服务业与装备制造业融合发展及效应评价研究——基于AHP-信息熵耦联评价模型[J].工业技术经济,2017(12):90-98.
[23] 胡李鹏,樊纲,徐建国.中国基础设施存量的再测算[J].经济研究,2016(8):172-186.
[24] 张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952-2000[J].经济研究,2004(10):35-44.
[25] Ackerberg D,Caves K,Frazer G.Structural indertification of production functions[R].Mimeo:UCLA Department of Economics,2006.
[26] Charnes A,Cooper W W,Rhodes E.Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1978,2(6):429-444.
[27] 杨国梁,刘文斌,郑海军.数据包络分析方法(DEA)综述[J].系统工程学报,2013,28(6):840-860.
[28] Banker R D,Charnes A,Cooper W W.Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J].Management Science,1984,30(9):1078-1092.
[29] Doyle J,Green R.Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA derivations meanings and the uses[J].European Journal of Operational Research Society,1994,45(5):567-578.
[30] 袁剑波,吴立辉,魏思.中立性DEA交叉效率评价方法[J].长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版),2011,8(4):24-28.
[31] 陈飞翔,黎开颜,刘佳.锁定效应与中国地区发展不平衡[J].管理世界,2007(12):8-17.
[32] Krugman P,Venables A J.Globalization and the inequality of nations[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1995,110(4):857-880.
[33] 金煜,陈钊,陆铭.中国的地区工业集聚:经济地理、新经济地理与经济政策[J].经济研究,2006(4):79-89.
[34] 韩峰,柯善咨.追踪我国制造业集聚的空间来源:基于马歇尔外部性与新经济地理的综合视角[J].管理世界,2012(10):55-70.
[35] 聂辉华,谭松涛,王宇锋.创新、企业规模和市场竞争:基于中国企业层面的面板数据[J].世界经济,2008(7):57-66.
[36] 王宇,刘志彪.补贴方式与均衡发展:战略性新兴产业成长与传统产业调整[J].中国工业经济,2013(8):57-69.
[37] 蒋为.环境规制是否影响了中国制造业企业研发创新?——基于微观数据的实证研究[J].财经研究,2015,41(2):76-87.
[38] 黄启新.金融发展、市场化水平与产业结构升级——基于中国省际面板数据的实证分析[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,53(2):60-68.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 67 -75 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 76 -80 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 81 -88 .