Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (1): 13-21.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2021.01.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Stimulus of Low Cost of Strong Organization: the Mechanism of Efficiency Transformation of Urban Grassroots Mass Autonomy System Led by the Party Building

WU Xiao-lin, XIE Yi-yun   

  1. Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China
  • Received:2020-10-04 Published:2021-03-26

Abstract: Guidance of the Party building has been the key to promote the efficiency transformation of the mass self-government system, the basic political system in China. Governance efficiency, in terms of grassroots, is embodied in three dimensions: the construction of organizational system, the improvement of residents' participation and the improvement of response. Efficiency of such kind follows the mechanism of “a stimulus of low-cost of strong organization”: 1) the community is divided into small units, thus reducing the scale cost of grassroots autonomy; 2) the ideology and discipline bring into full play of some residents, the Party members with dual identities of organization members, with the aid of which the community building is enhanced, thus reducing the organization cost of grassroots autonomy. Such a mechanism, therefore, conforms to the “cost-benefit principle” as it serves as a way out of the dilemma of large-scale community and difficult mobilization on the one hand, and reduces the cost of collective action on the other, thereby a rational choice for the transformation of system efficiency. This kind of mechanism, however, has to struggle with “organization expansion” and “effective incentive” in practice. Evenso, to help make full preparations, leverage the social forces and foster the consciousness of autonomy, have been major tasks to take on for the Party organizations.

Key words: strong organization, the Party building's leading, grassroots autonomy, residents' autonomy, governance efficiency

CLC Number: 

  • D63
[1] 习近平. 在庆祝中国共产党成立九十五周年大会上的讲话[M].北京:人民出版社,2016:22.
[2] Heller P. Social capital as a product of class mobilization and state intervention: Industrial workers in Kerala, India[J]. World Development, 1996, 24 (6): 1055-1071.
[3] 叶敏.社区自治能力培育中的国家介入——以上海嘉定区外冈镇“老大人”社区自治创新为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015(3):10-18.
[4] 唐亚林,陈先书.社区自治:城市社会基层民主的复归与张扬[J].学术界, 2003(6):7-22.
[5] 杨军剑.城市社区治理效能的整体提升及优化路径探析[J].学习论坛, 2019(8):85-89.
[6] 唐有财,王天夫.社区认同、骨干动员和组织赋权:社区参与式治理的实现路径[J].中国行政管理, 2017(2):73-78.
[7] Arifudin, Nasrul B, Maswadi. Program of Community Empowerment Prevents Forest Fires in Indonesian Peat Land[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2013, 17(1): 129-134.
[8] 王浦劬,汤彬.基层党组织治理权威塑造机制研究——基于T市B区社区党组织治理经验的分析[J].管理世界,2020(6):106-119.
[9] 郭为桂.“再组织化”:全面从严治党的战略抉择及其制度化导向[J].经济社会体制比较, 2019(1):11-21.
[10] 李浩,原珂.新时代社区党建创新:社区党建与社区治理复合体系[J].科学社会主义, 2019(3):76-83.
[11] 陈亮,李元.去“悬浮化”与有效治理:新时期党建引领基层社会治理的创新逻辑与类型学分析[J].探索, 2018(4):109-115.
[12] 韩冬雪,胡晓迪.社区治理中的小区党组织:运作机理与治理效能[J].行政论坛, 2020(3):11-18.
[13] 吴晓林,谢伊云.国家主导下的社会创制:城市基层治理转型的“凭借机制”——以成都市武侯区社区治理改革为例[J].中国行政管理, 2020(5):91-98.
[14] 张俊芳.中国城市社区居民自治刍议[J].天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2001(5):27-31.
[15] 李蓉蓉.城市居民社区政治效能感与社区自治[J].中国行政管理, 2013(3):53-57.
[16] 陈伟东.社区行动者逻辑:破解社区治理难题[J].政治学研究, 2018(1):103-106.
[17] Cohen, Michael. Community Size and Participation By Lawyers in Community Politics[J]. The Journal of Politics, 1969, 31(4): 1107-1110.
[18] [美]曼瑟·奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M]. 陈郁,郭宇峰,李崇新,译.上海:上海人民出版社, 1995:2.
[19] 谢正富.集体行动理论视角下的“微自治”有效性分析[J].云南行政学院学报, 2015(6):112-118.
[20] 刘凤,傅利平,孙兆辉.重心下移如何提升治理效能?——基于城市基层治理结构调适的多案例研究[J].公共管理学报, 2019(4):24-35.
[21] 容志,秦浩.再组织化与社会治理现代化:重大公共卫生事件中社区“整体网格”的运行逻辑及其启示[J].上海行政学院学报, 2020(6):66-77.
[22] 秦晓蕾,李延伟.治理效能提升视阈下公民参与治理创新的制度化之路——基于南京市机关作风群众评议18年演变历程的分析[J].治理研究, 2020(4):67-76.
[23] 吴晓林.党如何链接社会:城市社区党建的主体补位与社会建构[J].学术月刊, 2020(5):72-86.
[24] Thomas E L. Social class and size of community[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1959, 64(5): 505-508.
[25] 吴晓林,谢伊云.房权意识何以外溢到城市治理?——中国城市社区业主委员会治理功能的实证分析[J].江汉论坛, 2018(1):132-137.
[26] 徐勇.论城市社区建设中的社区居民自治[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2001(3):5-13.
[1] MA Liang. An Overall Arrangement for China's Governance: How to Transform Institutional Advantages into Governance Performance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 1-12.
[2] HAN Zhi-ming. Flexible Adaptive Mechanism ——The Dispersive Development and Efficiency of Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots Level [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 43-53.
[3] HAN Zhi-ming. Flexible Adaptive Mechanism ——The Dispersive Development and Efficiency of Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots Level [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 43-53.
[4] YUAN Fang-cheng, WAN Dan. Beyond “North Paradox”: From Institutional Performance to Governance Efficiency ——Taking the Reform of Residential Land System as the Research Object [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 67-81.
[5] Ma Wei-hong. To Bridge the Institutional Gap with the Same Structure of Government and Society: An Analysis of the Efficiency Transformation Mechanism of the Whistle Reform of Grassroots Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 82-93.
[6] Ma Wei-hong. To Bridge the Institutional Gap with the Same Structure of Government and Society: An Analysis of the Efficiency Transformation Mechanism of the Whistle Reform of Grassroots Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 82-93.
[7] MENG Tian-guang, WANG Ye. Social Governance Innovation Based on Big Data: Local Innovation and Governance Efficiency [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 111-123.
[8] MENG Tian-guang, WANG Ye. Social Governance Innovation Based on Big Data: Local Innovation and Governance Efficiency [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 111-123.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] MA Liang. An Overall Arrangement for China's Governance: How to Transform Institutional Advantages into Governance Performance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 1 -12 .
[2] LIU Jian-jun. A Study On the Spirit of China's Community[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 22 -42 .
[3] HAN Zhi-ming. Flexible Adaptive Mechanism ——The Dispersive Development and Efficiency of Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots Level[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 43 -53 .
[4] XIONG Yi-han, CAO Yi-ran. Spatial Redistribution: The Political Significance of the Governance of Rural-Urban Fringe Zone[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 54 -66 .
[5] YUAN Fang-cheng, WAN Dan. Beyond “North Paradox”: From Institutional Performance to Governance Efficiency ——Taking the Reform of Residential Land System as the Research Object[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 67 -81 .
[6] Ma Wei-hong. To Bridge the Institutional Gap with the Same Structure of Government and Society: An Analysis of the Efficiency Transformation Mechanism of the Whistle Reform of Grassroots Governance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 82 -93 .
[7] YANG Hua. “Tasks Assigned by Leaders”: Nature and Political Incentive ——An Interpretation of Personnel Incentive Mechanism in Grassroots Units[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 94 -110 .
[8] MENG Tian-guang, WANG Ye. Social Governance Innovation Based on Big Data: Local Innovation and Governance Efficiency[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 111 -123 .
[9] YI Cheng-zhi, WU Yun-yun. Typological Analysis of Collaborative Governance in Urban Environment: A Technology-Objective-Based Framework[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 124 -135 .
[10] Wang Bing-quan, Peng Chong. Observation of Formalism: An Organizational Perspective[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 136 -147 .