Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (1): 54-66.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2021.01.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Spatial Redistribution: The Political Significance of the Governance of Rural-Urban Fringe Zone

XIONG Yi-han, CAO Yi-ran   

  1. School of International Relations & Public Affairs, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2020-12-04 Published:2021-03-26

Abstract: The rural-urban fringe zone, as the forefront of rural urbanization, is the epitome of the pain in China's profound economic and social transformation, and the most sensitive area where social problems in urbanization are clustered. Its governance involves the transition and convergence between the urban and rural management systems as well as the adjustment of interests. It is, therefore, in urgent need of the reform and innovation of the government management system. The reform is a major adjustment of interests involving the relationship between industry and agriculture and that between urban and rural areas, which constitutes a major issue involving the governance of the grass-roots government and the overall development of urban and rural areas. Meanwhile, in the rural-urban fringe zone are found different dimensions of power game between the State and market, government and citizens, local residents and migrants, low-income groups and middle class, through which China's social changes and power game can be observed. The social development form of rural-urban fringe zone is quite different from that of urban and rural areas, which renders it the “blind area” of both urban and rural governance research. Urban governance is undergoing a process of “suburbanization” and the fringe zone is introducing social contradictions while accepting citizens and migrants. The zone accommodates local villagers, emerging middle class, urban low-income groups and migrant workers, forming a mosaic of class spatial distribution; incompatible multiple interests make the grass-roots government at the confluence of contradictions. The development of the fringe zone is actually a process of “spatial redistribution”, which has an important impact on China's stratum structure and social governance.

Key words: spatial redistribution, rural-urban fringe zone, social governance, middle class, migrant workers, large-scale society, space governance

CLC Number: 

  • D63-3
[1] 熊易寒. 社区选举:在政治冷漠与高投票率之间[J]. 社会, 2008(3):180-204.
[2] 熊易寒. 从业主福利到公民权利——一个中产阶层移民社区的政治参与[J]. 社会学研究, 2012,27(6):77-100.
[3] 熊易寒. 忠诚呼吁:为什么中产阶级偏好协商而非抗争[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2015,54(3):22-30.
[4] Xiong Y. Technology Transforms Politics: Internet + Government Services and the Transformation of the Grassroots Power Structure [J]. Social Sciences in China, 2019,40(4):173-192.
[5] 熊易寒. 国家助推与社会成长:现代熟人社区建构的案例研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2020(5):99-105.
[6] 孔祥利. 城乡结合部政府治理转型的困境与突围——以北京市为重点观察对象[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2012(2):100-105.
[7] 徐勇. 中国农村村民自治[M]. 武汉:华中师范大学出版社, 1997.
[8] 贺雪峰. 乡村治理的社会基础——转型期乡村社会性质研究[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2003.
[9] 吴毅. 村治变迁中的权威与秩序——20世纪川东双村的表达[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2002.
[10] 仝志辉. 乡村关系视野中的村庄选举——以内蒙古桥乡村委会换届选举为个案[M]. 西安:西北大学出版社, 2002.
[11] Kevin J O'Brien, Lianjiang Li. Rightful Resistance in Rural China[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[12] 何包钢,郎友兴. 寻找民主与权威的平衡:浙江省村民选举经验研究[M]. 武汉:华中师范大学出版社, 2002.
[13] 肖唐镖. 农村宗族与地方治理报告:跨学科的研究与对话[M]. 上海:学林出版社, 2010.
[14] 阎云翔. 礼物的流动:一个中国村庄中的互惠原则与社会网络[M].李放春,刘瑜,译.上海:上海人民出版社, 2017.
[15] 陈周旺. 选举、治理与基层社会的组织化——对上海近郊某村委会换届选举过程的观察[J]. 河北学刊, 2018,38(2):182-187.
[16] 荣敬本. 从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变:县乡两级政治体制改革[M]. 北京:中央编译出版社, 1998.
[17] 应星. 大河移民上访的故事:从“讨个说法”到“摆平理顺”[M]. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2001.
[18] 周庆智. 中国县级行政结构及其运行——对W县的社会学考察[M]. 贵阳:贵州人民出版社, 2004.
[19] 冯军旗. 中县干部[D]. 北京:北京大学, 2010.
[20] 刘建军. 单位中国——社会调控体系重构中的个人、组织与国家[M]. 天津:天津人民出版社, 2000.
[21] 李路路,李汉林. 中国的单位组织:资源、权力与交换[M]. 杭州:浙江人民出版社, 2000.
[22] 路风. 单位:一种特殊的社会组织形式[J]. 中国社会科学, 1989(1):71-88.
[23] 刘春荣. 社区治理与中国政治的边际革新[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社, 2018.
[24] 桂勇. 邻里空间:城市基层的行动、组织与互动[M]. 上海:上海书店出版社, 2008.
[25] 刘建军. 居民自治指导手册[M]. 上海:格致出版社, 2016.
[26] 李辉. 制造确定性:中国城市社区选举中的违规操作现象分析[J]. 当代中国政治研究报告, 2014(1):303-312.
[27] 谭同学. 楚镇的站所——乡镇机构生长的政治生态考察[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2006.
[28] 吴毅. 小镇喧嚣:一个乡镇政治运作的演绎与阐释[M]. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2007.
[29] 陈柏峰. 乡村江湖:两湖平原“混混”研究(1980-2008)[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社, 2010.
[30] 王汉生, 刘世定, 孙立平,等. “浙江村”:中国农民进入城市的一种独特方式[J]. 社会学研究, 1997(1):58-69.
[31] 项飚. 社区何为——对北京流动人口聚居区的研究[J]. 社会学研究, 1998(6):3-5.
[32] 黄公元. 城乡结合部的流动人口[J]. 杭州师范学院学报, 1998(1):119-124.
[33] 周大鸣, 高崇. 城乡结合部社区的研究——广州南景村50年的变迁[J]. 社会学研究, 2001(4):99-108.
[34] 吴维平, 王汉生. 寄居大都市:京沪两地流动人口住房现状分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2002(3):92-110.
[35] 蓝宇蕴. 我国“类贫民窟”的形成逻辑——关于城中村流动人口聚居区的研究[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2007(5):147-153.
[36] 李培林. 巨变:村落的终结——都市里的村庄研究[J]. 中国社会科学, 2002(1):168-179.
[37] 朱晓阳. 乡绅、“废墟”和自治[J]. 开放时代, 2016(4):165-190.
[38] 陈孟平. “城中村”公共物品供求研究——以北京市城乡接合部为例[J]. 城市问题, 2003(6):61-64.
[39] 姜爱华, 马静. 北京市城乡结合部社会保障的问题与对策研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2012(8):79-83.
[40] 易承志. 大城市城乡结合部公共服务资源是如何配置的?——以上海市J镇为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2015(6):70-83.
[41] 田毅鹏, 齐苗苗. 城乡结合部非定居性移民的“社区感”与“故乡情结”[J]. 天津社会科学, 2013(2):53-58.
[42] 何力武, 刘骥. 城中村改造:历史起源及行为者分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(3):78-82.
[43] 冯晓英,魏书华,陈孟平.由城乡分治走向统筹共治——中国城乡结合部管理制度创新研究:以北京为例[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2007.
[44] 谢宝富. 中国城乡结合部地区政府管理体制创新初探——以北京市城乡结合部为例[J]. 政治学研究, 2010(1):59-64.
[45] 孔祥利. 中国大城市城乡结合部政府治理研究——以北京市为例[D]. 北京:北京大学, 2009.
[46] 习近平. 决胜全面建成小康社会 夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[M]. 北京:人民出版社, 2017.
[47] 史云贵. 城乡结合部社会治理路径创新研究[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2019.
[48] 林莉, 张劲松. 过渡与协同:城镇化发展中城乡结合部新型社区治理[J]. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015,29(1):65-71.
[49] 戴祥玉, 卜凡帅. 城乡结合部老旧社区的嵌入式治理[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020,19(5):130-140.
[50] 熊易寒. 精细分层社会与中产焦虑症[J]. 文化纵横, 2020(5):112-120.
[51] 肖林. “后院”政治:城市中产阶层的“领地”意识[J]. 文化纵横, 2016(6):90-97.
[52] [美]威廉·朱利叶斯·威尔逊. 真正的穷人:内城区、底层阶级和公共政策[M].成伯清,鲍磊,张戌凡,译.上海:上海人民出版社, 2007.
[53] 赵新平, 周一星. 改革以来中国城市化道路及城市化理论研究述评[J]. 中国社会科学, 2002(2):132-138.
[54] 周飞舟. 生财有道:土地开发和转让中的政府和农民[J]. 社会学研究, 2007(1):49-82.
[55] 熊易寒. “半城市化”对中国乡村民主的挑战[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2012,51(1):28-34.
[56] 李友梅,耿敬,刘玉照. 快速城市化过程中的乡土文化转型[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社, 2007.
[57] 孙秀林, 周飞舟. 土地财政与分税制:一个实证解释[J]. 中国社会科学, 2013(4):40-59.
[58] 施芸卿. 增长与道义:城市开发的双重逻辑——以B市C城区“开发带危改”阶段为例[J]. 社会学研究, 2014,29(6):49-73.
[59] 徐建. 社会排斥视角的城市更新与弱势群体[D]. 上海:复旦大学, 2008.
[60] 肖林. 土地价值与社会约束:以B市C城区旧城改造为例[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2009.
[61] 马流辉. 底层社会、非正规经济与参与式治理——基于上海城乡接合部桥镇的考察[J]. 学习与实践, 2015(11):112-122.
[62] 熊易寒,冯静,梁银湘. 你中产了吗[M]. 上海:文汇出版社, 2015.
[63] 熊易寒. 中国中产阶层的政治倾向及其对舆情的影响[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019,43(5):158-161.
[64] 钱志鸿, 黄大志. 城市贫困、社会排斥和社会极化——当代西方城市贫困研究综述[J]. 国外社会科学, 2004(1):54-60.
[65] 王红霞. 中国城市马赛克:人口多元化进程及其社会影响[M]. 上海:上海社会科学院出版社, 2013.
[66] 郑冰岛. 冲突与融合:社会转型中的人口流动[M]. 上海:上海书店出版社, 2018.
[1] MENG Tian-guang, WANG Ye. Social Governance Innovation Based on Big Data: Local Innovation and Governance Efficiency [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 111-123.
[2] MENG Tian-guang, WANG Ye. Social Governance Innovation Based on Big Data: Local Innovation and Governance Efficiency [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 111-123.
[3] FENG Chao-rui, ZHANG Ye-qing. Research on Function Optimization Path of National Poverty Alleviation Information ——A Multi-case Analysis Based on Blockchain Perspective [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 70-85.
[4] TAN Xu-yun, DOU Xue-jiao, DONG Hong-jie. Current Situation and Upgrading Countermeasures of People’s Sense of Gain from the Perspective of Social Stratification [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(5): 1-13.
[5] ZHU Xin-shan. The Range of Migrant Workers’ Mobility, Regional Choice and the Addressing “issues concerning farmers” in China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(3): 43-51.
[6] TU Yao-jun. The Characteristics of Faith Contract, Social Managerial Functions and Enlightenment of Tablet Inscription in Guangxi Minority Areas [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(5): 21-27.
[7] SU Liang-yi. Analysis of Educational Conflict and Integration of Migrant Workers’ Children under the Vision of Field [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(6): 115-121.
[8] LI Yu-xiong, LIN Chun-yi. The Ethical Orientation of Contemporary Social Governance ——Rereading Karl Marx’s The Civil War in France [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(2): 31-35.
[9] CHU Tian-you. Social Governance Mechanism: Conceptual Definition and Framework [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(2): 42-45.
[10] XIE Long-hua. A Study on the Learning Quality of Migrant Workers’ Children     in Primary Schools [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(3): 143-148.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] MA Liang. An Overall Arrangement for China's Governance: How to Transform Institutional Advantages into Governance Performance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 1 -12 .
[2] WU Xiao-lin, XIE Yi-yun. A Stimulus of Low Cost of Strong Organization: the Mechanism of Efficiency Transformation of Urban Grassroots Mass Autonomy System Led by the Party Building[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 13 -21 .
[3] LIU Jian-jun. A Study On the Spirit of China's Community[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 22 -42 .
[4] HAN Zhi-ming. Flexible Adaptive Mechanism ——The Dispersive Development and Efficiency of Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots Level[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 43 -53 .
[5] YUAN Fang-cheng, WAN Dan. Beyond “North Paradox”: From Institutional Performance to Governance Efficiency ——Taking the Reform of Residential Land System as the Research Object[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 67 -81 .
[6] Ma Wei-hong. To Bridge the Institutional Gap with the Same Structure of Government and Society: An Analysis of the Efficiency Transformation Mechanism of the Whistle Reform of Grassroots Governance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 82 -93 .
[7] YANG Hua. “Tasks Assigned by Leaders”: Nature and Political Incentive ——An Interpretation of Personnel Incentive Mechanism in Grassroots Units[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 94 -110 .
[8] MENG Tian-guang, WANG Ye. Social Governance Innovation Based on Big Data: Local Innovation and Governance Efficiency[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 111 -123 .
[9] YI Cheng-zhi, WU Yun-yun. Typological Analysis of Collaborative Governance in Urban Environment: A Technology-Objective-Based Framework[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 124 -135 .
[10] Wang Bing-quan, Peng Chong. Observation of Formalism: An Organizational Perspective[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 136 -147 .