Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (1): 43-53.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2021.01.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Flexible Adaptive Mechanism ——The Dispersive Development and Efficiency of Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots Level

HAN Zhi-ming   

  1. School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200230, China
  • Received:2020-12-15 Published:2021-03-26

Abstract: Deliberative democracy, as it is put on the agenda by the Party and the State, at the grassroots level has developed diffusely-formal recognition, improved system, improved procedural mechanism, more diverse forms and richer topics, with a prospect that has rendered positive governance efficiency, i.e. cultivating the social spirit of consultation and dialogue, alleviating the social conflicts at the grass-roots level, relieving the governance pressure for the Party and the State, reconciling the diversified social values, integrating the scattered personal knowledge, and reshaping the system of governance at the grass-roots level. The development of such attributes to multiple factors, mainly, for achieving governance efficiency, the flexible adaptive mechanism. Such mechanism is embodied in the unity of centralized leadership and decentralized exploration, the integration of formal system and informal system, the complementarity of electoral democracy and deliberative democracy, and the coupling of traditional value and modern consciousness. Such a conclusion not only shows how the diffuse development of grassroots deliberative democracy is realized, but also explains how such democracy is transformed into governance efficiency.

Key words: flexible adaptability, grassroots deliberative democracy, diffuse development, governance efficiency, grassroots governance, electoral democracy

CLC Number: 

  • D63-3
[1] 何包钢,吴进进.社会矛盾与中国城市协商民主制度化的兴起[J].开放时代,2017(3):101-124.
[2] 赵静.敞开胸怀谈,有事商量办,温岭民主恳谈会20年举办3万余场[EB/OL]. https://zj.qq.com/a/20191208/001244.htm.
[3] 张等文,郭雨佳.乡村振兴进程中协商民主嵌入乡村治理的内在机理与路径选择[J].政治学研究,2020(2):104-115.
[4] 中共民政部党组.党的十八大以来中国特色基层民主建设的显著成就[J].中国政协理论研究,2017(3):2-4.
[5] 卜万红.论我国基层协商式治理探索的成就与经验——基于民主恳谈会与“四议两公开”工作法的分析[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2015(5):45-52.
[6] 闫夏,刘晖.农村基层协商民主的典型探索与实践路径研究[J].学习论坛,2018(2):38-43.
[7] 倪赤丹,陈文岚.“民生微实事”构建社区治理大格局——深圳市南山区共建共治共享的实践探索[J].社会治理,2018(8):79-83.
[8] 霍伟岸.美国联邦参议院的协商民主及其实践困境[J].学海,2014(2):61-68.
[9] 韩志明.理性对话与权利博弈:政协协商与基层协商的比较分析[J].探索,2018(5):51-60.
[10] 习近平.在庆祝中国人民政治协商会议成立 65 周年大会上的讲话[N]. 人民日报,2014-09-22(2).
[11] 张爱军,张媛.网络协商民主的实践优势、困境及其化解[J].江淮论坛,2019(4):63-69.
[12] 司法部:全国人民调解组织每年调解各类矛盾纠纷逾900万起[EB/OL].http//www.xinhuanet.com/legal/2018-04/27/c_1122753000.htm.
[13] 何哲.基层治理的复杂性和干部面临的现实难题[J].国家治理,2020(4):7-11.
[14] Stasavage D. Polarization and publicity: rethinking the benefits of deliberative democracy[J]. The Journal of Politics, 2007, 69(1): 59-72.
[15] 张康之.模式化行动与合作行动中的知识类型及其比较[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2019(4):5-12.
[16] 韩志明.寻找个人知识:现代国家治理的知识逻辑[J].南京社会科学,2019(3):47-57.
[17] 齐卫平,陈朋.现代国家治理与协商民主的耦合及其共进发展[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(4):49-55.
[18] 顾盼,韩志明.基层协商民主的比较优势及其发展路径[J].行政论坛,2016(6):20-24.
[19] 陈家刚.党的领导与协商民主[J].江汉论坛,2018(11):35-40.
[20] 周雪光.从“黄宗羲定律”到帝国的逻辑:中国国家治理逻辑的历史线索[J].开放时代,2014(4):108-132.
[21] 卢兴.协商民主与中华优秀传统文化[N].光明日报,2015-04-05(7).
[22] 谈火生.中国传统政治中的协商系统[J].天府新论,2016(5):8-11.
[1] MA Liang. An Overall Arrangement for China's Governance: How to Transform Institutional Advantages into Governance Performance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 1-12.
[2] WU Xiao-lin, XIE Yi-yun. A Stimulus of Low Cost of Strong Organization: the Mechanism of Efficiency Transformation of Urban Grassroots Mass Autonomy System Led by the Party Building [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 13-21.
[3] HAN Zhi-ming. Flexible Adaptive Mechanism ——The Dispersive Development and Efficiency of Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots Level [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 43-53.
[4] YUAN Fang-cheng, WAN Dan. Beyond “North Paradox”: From Institutional Performance to Governance Efficiency ——Taking the Reform of Residential Land System as the Research Object [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 67-81.
[5] Ma Wei-hong. To Bridge the Institutional Gap with the Same Structure of Government and Society: An Analysis of the Efficiency Transformation Mechanism of the Whistle Reform of Grassroots Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 82-93.
[6] Ma Wei-hong. To Bridge the Institutional Gap with the Same Structure of Government and Society: An Analysis of the Efficiency Transformation Mechanism of the Whistle Reform of Grassroots Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 82-93.
[7] MENG Tian-guang, WANG Ye. Social Governance Innovation Based on Big Data: Local Innovation and Governance Efficiency [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 111-123.
[8] MENG Tian-guang, WANG Ye. Social Governance Innovation Based on Big Data: Local Innovation and Governance Efficiency [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 111-123.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] MA Liang. An Overall Arrangement for China's Governance: How to Transform Institutional Advantages into Governance Performance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 1 -12 .
[2] WU Xiao-lin, XIE Yi-yun. A Stimulus of Low Cost of Strong Organization: the Mechanism of Efficiency Transformation of Urban Grassroots Mass Autonomy System Led by the Party Building[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 13 -21 .
[3] LIU Jian-jun. A Study On the Spirit of China's Community[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 22 -42 .
[4] XIONG Yi-han, CAO Yi-ran. Spatial Redistribution: The Political Significance of the Governance of Rural-Urban Fringe Zone[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 54 -66 .
[5] YUAN Fang-cheng, WAN Dan. Beyond “North Paradox”: From Institutional Performance to Governance Efficiency ——Taking the Reform of Residential Land System as the Research Object[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 67 -81 .
[6] Ma Wei-hong. To Bridge the Institutional Gap with the Same Structure of Government and Society: An Analysis of the Efficiency Transformation Mechanism of the Whistle Reform of Grassroots Governance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 82 -93 .
[7] YANG Hua. “Tasks Assigned by Leaders”: Nature and Political Incentive ——An Interpretation of Personnel Incentive Mechanism in Grassroots Units[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 94 -110 .
[8] MENG Tian-guang, WANG Ye. Social Governance Innovation Based on Big Data: Local Innovation and Governance Efficiency[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 111 -123 .
[9] YI Cheng-zhi, WU Yun-yun. Typological Analysis of Collaborative Governance in Urban Environment: A Technology-Objective-Based Framework[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 124 -135 .
[10] Wang Bing-quan, Peng Chong. Observation of Formalism: An Organizational Perspective[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 136 -147 .