城市环境协同治理的类型学分析——基于技术-目标的框架

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2021.01.010

Abstract

Abstract: Collaborative governance of urban environment is a systematic process, and it is carried out in terms of target and technology. The technology-target framework formed by the two dimensionsbears outstanding value in the analysis of collaborative governance, which, according to the two-dimensional index, falls into the four types namely formal, symbolic, fragmented and refined. To improveits performance, the transformation into refined governance is needed. And its effective promotion is inseparable from the support of goal coordination and technical support. From the technology-target dimension analysis, it needs to strengthen the overall urban environmental governance concept, optimize the subject structure, strengthen the institutional construction, and promote technological innovation.

Key words: urban ecological environment, collaborative governance, governance technology, technology governance, typology

CLC Number:

YI Cheng-zhi, WU Yun-yun. Typological Analysis of Collaborative Governance in Urban Environment: A Technology-Objective-Based Framework[J].Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 124-135.

References

[1] 陈诗一,武英涛.环保税制改革与雾霾协同治理——基于治理边际成本的视角[J].学术月刊,2018,50(10):39-57+117.
[2] 陈桂生.环境治理悖论中的地方政府与公民社会:一个智猪博弈的模型[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(2):85-93.
[3] 易承志,顾丽娜.优化城市公共安全体系[N].学习时报,2018-08-22(6).
[4] 国家统计局.中华人民共和国2018年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[N].人民日报,2019-03-01(10).
[5] 易承志,张开羽.当代中国环境治理中的网络式协同及其优化——以“零盟”为例[J].社会科学,2019(3):3-16.
[6] 国务院.国务院关于印发打赢蓝天保卫战三年行动计划的通知[EB/OL].(2018-07-03).中国政府网,http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-07/03/content_5303158.htm.
[7] 余敏江.论区域生态环境协同治理的制度基础——基于社会学制度主义的分析视角[J].理论探讨,2013(2):13-17+2.
[8] 余敏江.中国特色城市环境治理的道路特质[J].探索,2019(1):59-69.
[9] 沈坤荣,金刚,方娴.环境规制引起了污染就近转移吗?[J].经济研究,2017,52(5):44-59.
[10] 唐亚林,钱坤.城市精细化治理的经验及其优化对策——以上海“五违四必”生态环境综合治理为例[J].上海行政学院学报,2019,20(2):43-52.
[11] 郑巧,肖文涛.协同治理:服务型政府的治道逻辑[J].中国行政管理,2008(7):48-53.
[12] 余敏江.论城市生态象征性治理的形成机理[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,32(3):52-55.
[13] 刘天旭,范风华.象征性治理——对政府治理失灵的一个概括[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2009(5):23-29+125.
[14] 余敏江.以环境精细化治理推进美丽中国建设研究论纲[J].山东社会科学,2016(6):17-22.
[15] 易承志.跨界公共事务、区域合作共治与整体性治理[J].学术月刊,2017,49(11):67-78.
[16] 陈文.城市社会“碎片化治理”的生成机理与消解逻辑[J].经济社会体制比较,2017(3):54-63.
[17] 费广胜.治理共同体:城市社会治理创新的路向选择——以碎片化治理为视角[J].内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,50(6):17-22.
[18] 韩志明.从粗放式管理到精细化治理——迈向复杂社会的治理转型[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版),2019,18(1):107-114.
[19] 余敏江.环境精细化治理:何以必要与可能?[J].行政论坛,2018,25(6):116-122.
[20] 锁利铭,冯小东.数据驱动的城市精细化治理:特征、要素与系统耦合[J].公共管理学报,2018,15(4):17-26+150.
[21] 上海市人民政府 .上海市国民经济和社会发展第十三个五年规划纲要[N].解放日报,2016-02-01(1).
[22] 耿秋萍.以绿色发展为引领坚决打好上海污染防治攻坚战——访第十三届全国人民代表大会代表,上海市环境保护局局长,中国农工民主党中央委员会委员、上海市委副主委寿子琪[J].环境保护,2018,46(6):25-28.
[23] 蒋卓庆.关于本市生态环境综合整治情况的报告——2016年9月12日在上海市第十四届人民代表大会常务委员会第三十二次会议上[EB/OL].(2016-11-02).上海人大,http://www.spcsc.sh.cn/n1939/n2440/n3334/u1ai135324.html.
[24] 曹磊.上海深化河长制落实湖长制力争2020年全面消除劣V类水体[EB/OL].(2019-03-25).东方网,http://news.eastday.com/s/20190325/u1ai12362047.html.
[25] 王佳妮,曹磊.沪提前16个月实现“河长制”全覆盖中心城区水质全面达标[EB/OL].(2017-11-14).东方网,http://sh.eastday.com/m/20171114/u1ai10997066.html.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	MA Liang. An Overall Arrangement for China's Governance: How to Transform Institutional Advantages into Governance Performance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 1 -12 .
[2]	WU Xiao-lin, XIE Yi-yun. A Stimulus of Low Cost of Strong Organization: the Mechanism of Efficiency Transformation of Urban Grassroots Mass Autonomy System Led by the Party Building[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 13 -21 .
[3]	LIU Jian-jun. A Study On the Spirit of China's Community[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 22 -42 .
[4]	HAN Zhi-ming. Flexible Adaptive Mechanism ——The Dispersive Development and Efficiency of Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots Level[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 43 -53 .
[5]	XIONG Yi-han, CAO Yi-ran. Spatial Redistribution: The Political Significance of the Governance of Rural-Urban Fringe Zone[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 54 -66 .
[6]	YUAN Fang-cheng, WAN Dan. Beyond “North Paradox”: From Institutional Performance to Governance Efficiency ——Taking the Reform of Residential Land System as the Research Object[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 67 -81 .
[7]	Ma Wei-hong. To Bridge the Institutional Gap with the Same Structure of Government and Society: An Analysis of the Efficiency Transformation Mechanism of the Whistle Reform of Grassroots Governance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 82 -93 .
[8]	YANG Hua. “Tasks Assigned by Leaders”: Nature and Political Incentive ——An Interpretation of Personnel Incentive Mechanism in Grassroots Units[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 94 -110 .
[9]	MENG Tian-guang, WANG Ye. Social Governance Innovation Based on Big Data: Local Innovation and Governance Efficiency[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 111 -123 .
[10]	Wang Bing-quan, Peng Chong. Observation of Formalism: An Organizational Perspective[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 136 -147 .

Typological Analysis of Collaborative Governance in Urban Environment: A Technology-Objective-Based Framework

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 6

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	YI Cheng-zhi, WU Yun-yun. Typological Analysis of Collaborative Governance in Urban Environment: A Technology-Objective-Based Framework [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 124-135.
[2]	YAN Chang-wu, YANG Zheng-yuan. What is Technology Governance？ [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 11-22.
[3]	HAN Zhi-ming, LEI Ye-fei. “Change” and “Constant” of Technology Governance——Take the Case of “palm cloud community” in Qixia, Nanjing as An Example [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 23-33.
[4]	YUAN Fang-cheng, LI Si-hang. The Risk of Technology Governance and Its Evolution Logic——Take Targeted Poverty Alleviation in Rural Areas as the Analysis Object [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 45-61.
[5]	WU Xiao-ling. Technology Empowerment and Bureaucratic Regulation: Political Logic in Technology Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 73-81.
[6]	FAN Zhong-yuan. The Typology Research of the Strength Degree and Semantic Generalization Level of the Cross-Class Combination of the Universal Classifiers [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 53(4): 49-54.