Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (1): 111-123.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2021.01.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Social Governance Innovation Based on Big Data: Local Innovation and Governance Efficiency

MENG Tian-guang, WANG Ye   

  1. Department of Political Science, School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084
  • Received:2020-11-10 Published:2021-03-26

Abstract: As the digital transformation of the state-society relations is promoted by digital and intelligent technologies through dual mechanisms of technology empowerment and technology empowerment, big data has been increasingly widely used in social governance innovation. Social governance based on big data aims to build a collaborative governance platform between government and society. Based on the empowerment of emerging information technology, it employs rich data resources and advanced analysis technology to digitize and algorithmize the complex and multidimensional social operation so as to grasp the law of social operation; it relies on the interaction between government and citizens to accumulate knowledge and strategies of social governance so as to improve the intelligence of social governance. On the one hand, with a great leap of marketization, urbanization and digitization in China, all sectors of the society have strong recognition and urgent expectations for social governance driven by big data. On the other hand, the application of big data in many aspects of social governance renders it urgent to speed up the building of intelligent social governance system. Big data has been widely used and born great potential in social governance, and become a new driving force for the government and society to promote social governance, improve governance efficiency and governance ability, this paper, based on a survey of cadres and the folks all over China, tells; in addition, in big data innovation in social governance, its application in public transportation, social security, government services, health care and so on works best as the internal connection of data can be found, and one-size-fits-all approach in social governance avoided; the policy-making can be precise so as to provide more personalized social governance. By collecting a large amount of data, the public's preference for various policies can be learned and the specific evaluation of the public on the implementation of policies obtained. Even so, there liesome challenges, such as difficulty in data opening and sharing, lack of top-level design, conflicts of interest between departments, and uneasy accessibility. On that account comes some suggestions: 1) promoted by leading officials' overall promotion and supported by corresponding mechanisms; 2) strengthen government leadership and coordinate the participation of government, enterprises and social groups; 3) coordinate in a unified way by specialized agencies and strengthen the response to assist decision-making; 4) adhere to the “thepeople-centered” approach and let the data serve the public.

Key words: big data, social governance, governance efficiency, local innovation, digital technology, government services

CLC Number: 

  • D63-3
[1] 刘涛雄, 徐晓飞. 大数据与宏观经济分析研究综述[J]. 国外理论动态, 2015(1):57-64.
[2] 孟天广, 郭凤林. 大数据政治学:新信息时代的政治现象及其探析路径[J]. 国外理论动态, 2015(1):46-56.
[3] 孟天广,赵娟.大数据驱动的智能化社会治理:理论建构与治理体系[J].电子政务,2018(8):2-11.
[4] 胡锐军. 社会冲突触发因素的政治学分析[J]. 政治学研究,2015(2): 22-35.
[ 5] 中国互联网络信息中心.中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/202004/P020200428399188064169.pdf.
[6] 张华,仝志辉,刘俊卿.“选择性回应”:网络条件下的政策参与——基于留言版型网络问政的个案研究[J].=公共行政评论,2013,6(3):101-12.
[7] 孟天广,李锋.网络空间的政治互动:公民诉求与政府回应性——基于全国性网络问政平台的大数据分析[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,30(3):17-29.
[8] 孟天广.重访回应性政府:网络问政制度的多样性与制度绩效(英文)[J].Social Sciences in China,2019,40(4):148-172.
[9] 熊易寒.技术改变政治:互联网+政务服务与基层权力结构的变迁(英文)[J].Social Sciences in China,2019,40(4):173-192.
[10] Peters B G, Pierre J. Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,1998,8(2):223-243.
[11] 朱光磊. 全面深化改革进程中的中国新治理观[J]. 中国社会科学,2017(4): 27-39.
[12] Barker, Rodney. Associate Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance (Book Review)[J]. The British Journal of Sociology,1995,46(2):358.
[13] Reddel T. Third Way Social Governance: Where is the State?[J].Australian Journal of Social Issues,2004,39(2):129-142.
[14] 周志忍. 从运作角度审视国家治理现代化[J]. 中国机构改革与管理,2018(1):26-27.
[15] 燕继荣. 中国社会治理的理论探索与实践创新[J]. 教学与研究,2017(9):29-37.
[16] Ripberger J T. Capturing Curiosity: Using Internet Search Trends to Measure Public Attentiveness[J]. Policy Studies Journal,2011,39(2):239-259.
[17] 韩福国.作为嵌入性治理资源的协商民主——现代城市治理中的政府与社会互动规则[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2013,55(3):156-164.
[18] 张小劲, 李岩.从语义图解到模式理解:《关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》中关于治理问题的论述[J]. 当代世界与社会主义,2014(1):11-18.
[19] 孟庆国, 关欣. 论电子治理的内涵、价值与绩效实现[J]. 行政论坛,2015(7):33-38.
[20] 马亮. 公共部门大数据应用的动机、能力与绩效:理论述评与研究展望[J].电子政务,2016(3):62-74.
[21] 郑磊. 开放政府数据研究:概念辨析、关键因素及其互动关系[J]. 中国行政管理,2015(11):13-18.
[22] 郑跃平, 刘美岑. 开放数据评估的现状及存在问题——基于国外开放数据评估的对比和分析[J]. 电子政务,2016(8): 84-93.
[23] 黄璜, 赵倩, 张锐昕. 论政府数据开放与信息公开——对现有观点的反思与重构[J]. 中国行政管理,2016(11):13-18.
[24] 黄璜.对“数据流动”的治理——论政府数据治理的理论嬗变与框架[J]. 南京社会科学,2018(2):53-62.
[25] 王浦劬. 国家治理、政府治理和社会治理的含义及其相互关系[J]. 国家行政学院学报,2014(3):11-17.
[26] 孟天广, 张小劲. 大数据驱动与政府治理能力提升——理论框架与模式创新[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2018(1):18-25.
[27] [英]安德鲁·查德威克.互联网政治学:国家、公民与新传播技术[M].北京:华夏出版社,2010.
[28] Meng Tianguang, Jenifer Pan, Ping Yang. Conditional Receptivity to Citizen Participation Evidence from a Survey Experiment in China[J]. Comparative Political Studies,2017,50(3):399-433.
[29] 杨安,严奉云,苗红. 大数据在社会治理创新中的应用[J]. 观察与思考,2015(8):59-62.
[1] MA Liang. An Overall Arrangement for China's Governance: How to Transform Institutional Advantages into Governance Performance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 1-12.
[2] WU Xiao-lin, XIE Yi-yun. A Stimulus of Low Cost of Strong Organization: the Mechanism of Efficiency Transformation of Urban Grassroots Mass Autonomy System Led by the Party Building [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 13-21.
[3] HAN Zhi-ming. Flexible Adaptive Mechanism ——The Dispersive Development and Efficiency of Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots Level [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 43-53.
[4] HAN Zhi-ming. Flexible Adaptive Mechanism ——The Dispersive Development and Efficiency of Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots Level [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 43-53.
[5] XIONG Yi-han, CAO Yi-ran. Spatial Redistribution: The Political Significance of the Governance of Rural-Urban Fringe Zone [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 54-66.
[6] YUAN Fang-cheng, WAN Dan. Beyond “North Paradox”: From Institutional Performance to Governance Efficiency ——Taking the Reform of Residential Land System as the Research Object [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 67-81.
[7] Ma Wei-hong. To Bridge the Institutional Gap with the Same Structure of Government and Society: An Analysis of the Efficiency Transformation Mechanism of the Whistle Reform of Grassroots Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 82-93.
[8] Ma Wei-hong. To Bridge the Institutional Gap with the Same Structure of Government and Society: An Analysis of the Efficiency Transformation Mechanism of the Whistle Reform of Grassroots Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 82-93.
[9] MENG Tian-guang, WANG Ye. Social Governance Innovation Based on Big Data: Local Innovation and Governance Efficiency [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 111-123.
[10] FENG Chao-rui, ZHANG Ye-qing. Research on Function Optimization Path of National Poverty Alleviation Information ——A Multi-case Analysis Based on Blockchain Perspective [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 70-85.
[11] TAN Xu-yun, DOU Xue-jiao, DONG Hong-jie. Current Situation and Upgrading Countermeasures of People’s Sense of Gain from the Perspective of Social Stratification [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(5): 1-13.
[12] YANG Xian-min, LI Xin, JIN Xin-quan. Data Application Logic and Strategy Design in Smart Classroom [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(5): 78-87.
[13] MA Liang. Civil Servants’ Information Technology Capacity and the Construction of Digital Government: Evidence from a Nationwide Survey of Urban China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 34-44.
[14] ZHANG Bing-xuan, REN Zhe. Rural Governance Driven by Digital Technology [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(2): 62-72.
[15] SUN Zhi-jian. Structural Innovation of In-process and After-the-fact Supervision Tools: Review and Prospect of Five-year Practice [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(1): 42-54.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] MA Liang. An Overall Arrangement for China's Governance: How to Transform Institutional Advantages into Governance Performance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 1 -12 .
[2] WU Xiao-lin, XIE Yi-yun. A Stimulus of Low Cost of Strong Organization: the Mechanism of Efficiency Transformation of Urban Grassroots Mass Autonomy System Led by the Party Building[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 13 -21 .
[3] LIU Jian-jun. A Study On the Spirit of China's Community[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 22 -42 .
[4] HAN Zhi-ming. Flexible Adaptive Mechanism ——The Dispersive Development and Efficiency of Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots Level[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 43 -53 .
[5] XIONG Yi-han, CAO Yi-ran. Spatial Redistribution: The Political Significance of the Governance of Rural-Urban Fringe Zone[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 54 -66 .
[6] YUAN Fang-cheng, WAN Dan. Beyond “North Paradox”: From Institutional Performance to Governance Efficiency ——Taking the Reform of Residential Land System as the Research Object[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 67 -81 .
[7] Ma Wei-hong. To Bridge the Institutional Gap with the Same Structure of Government and Society: An Analysis of the Efficiency Transformation Mechanism of the Whistle Reform of Grassroots Governance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 82 -93 .
[8] YANG Hua. “Tasks Assigned by Leaders”: Nature and Political Incentive ——An Interpretation of Personnel Incentive Mechanism in Grassroots Units[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 94 -110 .
[9] YI Cheng-zhi, WU Yun-yun. Typological Analysis of Collaborative Governance in Urban Environment: A Technology-Objective-Based Framework[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 124 -135 .
[10] Wang Bing-quan, Peng Chong. Observation of Formalism: An Organizational Perspective[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 136 -147 .