Abstract: The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 gained fame in the classical world with its discovery of “another Marx”. Its classicism is often interpreted in the in-depth study of scholars both in and out of the field, resulting in both positive and negative impacts. The explanatory history of this work bears two properties: one is prepared for us to say that it enjoys “excellent”, “standard”, and “exemplary” characteristics, and the other runs just the opposite. It, therefore, has witnessed both the process of shaping and deconstructing classics. As for its classic interpretation as an experiential event in hermeneutics, the important question is how and to what extent should the overall unity and rigorous structure of this work be emphasized. In any case, we should discover the era relationship that is closely related to us based on the original text, and shape its classic essence from the idea of fundamental value distribution. This work is the precursor to human liberation, and the task of contemporary readers is to provide more credible evidence and judgment on it.

Key words: Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, timeliness, classicism, physicalization