Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (6): 46-58.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2024.06.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Organizational Functions That Community Workers Play in Community Governance

WANG De-fu   

  1. School of Sociology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Received:2023-12-12 Online:2024-11-25 Published:2024-11-14

Abstract: Community is the primary-level foundation, and community workers are the backbone of community governance. In the local context, community workers are not only active managers, but also organizers of mass life who shoulder political functions. To fully play the leading role of the Party building in community governance means not only mobilizing the masses to handle community affairs well, but also educating and shaping them, i.e. to transform dispersed masses into powerful and conscious forces. In governance practice, as active managers, the more strategically community workers respond to assessments on indicator, process, and satisfaction, the weaker their ability of mobilization will be. The root cause of this problem lies in the substitution, brought about by the sinking of governance focus, of resource with mobilization. It is necessary, to reshape mass life organizers, explore and adopt a new form of organizational mobilization, namely limited mobilization targeting key groups and events.

Key words: community workers, active governance, mass life organizers, the leading role of Party building

CLC Number:  C916
[1] 新华社.解放思想创新求变向海图强开放发展 奋力谱写中国式现代化广西篇章[J].当代广西,2023(24):4-6.
[2] 王德福.新生代社区工作者的职业激励与职业发展——兼论面向社区治理现代化的干部培养路径[J].理论月刊,2022(12):109-119.
[3] 吴晓林.党建引领与治理体系建设:十八大以来城乡社区治理的实践走向[J].上海行政学院学报,2020(3):12-22.
[4] 孙柏瑛.城市社区居委会“去行政化”何以可能?[J].南京社会科学,2016(7):51-58.
[5] 王红,王正中.社区工作者职业发展的现状、困境及求解路径——基于淮安市社区工作者职业发展的深度访谈[J].四川行政学院学报,2022(1):18-27.
[6] 王学梦.1949年以来我国城市社区代理人角色生成与嬗变——以杭州市上城区为分析单位[J].理论月刊,2021(3):108-118.
[7] 许宝君.社区工作者的职业困境与非制度性应对[J].城市问题,2020(5):97-103.
[8] 刘莉,刘倓麟.无职而有责:社区工作者身份失衡的制度性解释[J].社会工作,2021(4):69-78.
[9] 王海宇.有限度的自主——当前社区治理中的社区干部[J].青年研究,2018(2):67-76.
[10] 芦恒.找回责任:社区干部“诉苦”的叙事实践研究[J].社会工作,2021(2):11-22.
[11] 贺雪峰.行政体制中的责权利层级不对称问题[J].云南行政学院学报,2015(4):5-7.
[12] 叶娟丽,马骏.公共行政中的街头官僚理论[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(5):612-618.
[13] 董伟玮,李靖.街头官僚概念的中国适用性:对中国街头官僚概念内涵和外延的探讨[J].云南社会科学,2017(1):26-33.
[14] 朱亚鹏,刘云香.制度环境、自由裁量权与中国社会政策执行——以C市城市低保政策执行为例[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2014(6):159-168.
[15] 杨爱平,余雁鸿.选择性应付:社区居委会行动逻辑的组织分析——以G市L社区为例[J].社会学研究,2012(4):105-126.
[16] 孙旭友.压力型体制“进社区”:居委会的实践运作与组织形塑——基于南京城市社区的分析[J].社会工作与管理,2019(1):55-61.
[17] 凌争.“以闲养忙”:社区居委会的自主性研究[J].社会科学研究,2023(5):45-53.
[18] 侯利文,文军.科层为体、自治为用:居委会主动行政化的内生逻辑——以苏南地区宜街为例[J].社会学研究,2022(1):136-155.
[19] 韩志明,李春生.依势而为的行动策略及其情境逻辑——基于B居委会实践案例的观察[J].中国行政管理,2022(7):39-47.
[20] 高飞.梯度情感动员的双重过程:社会治理共同体构建中的递进逻辑[J].中国行政管理,2022(4):55-62.
[21] 姚尚建,施清雯.社区动员中的基层干部:角色转换和行为调适——基于S市F社区加装电梯的个案考察[J].天津行政学院学报,2022(6):22-31.
[22] 景跃进.将政党带进来——国家与社会关系范畴的反思与重构[J].探索与争鸣,2019(8):85-100.
[23] 唐亚林.使命型政党:新型政党理论分析范式创新与发展之道[J].政治学研究,2021(4):38-49.
[24] 汪仕凯.先锋队政党的治理逻辑:全面从严治党的理论透视[J].政治学研究,2017(1):26-39.
[25] 毛泽东.毛泽东选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1991.
[26] 王德福.业主自治的困境及其超越[J].求索,2019(3):88-96.
[27] 王德福.催化合作与优化协作:党建引领社区治理现代化的实现机制[J].云南行政学院学报,2019(3):13-20.
[28] 王绍光.人民至上:“人民”“为人民”“人民共和国”[J].中央社会主义学院学报,2021(2):50-60.
[29] 毛泽东.毛泽东选集(第三卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1991.
[30] 潘维.落实党的群众路线——以城市基层党建为视角[J].中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报,2021(4):5-11.
[31] 汪仕凯.将人民带回中国政治研究[J].政治学研究,2023(2):129-139.
[32] 王德福,张雪霖.社区动员中的精英替代及其弊端分析[J].城市问题,2017(1):76-84.
[33] 贺雪峰,刘岳.基层治理中的“不出事逻辑”[J].学术研究,2010(6):32-37.
[34] 韩志明.行动的选择与制度的逻辑——对“闹大”现象的理论分析[J].中国行政管理,2010(5):110-113.
[35] 潘维.信仰人民:中国共产党与中国政治传统[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2017.
[36] 王欢明,刘梦凡.基层党建何以引领公共服务合作生产以促进城市社区更新——以老旧小区电梯加装为例[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022(6):26-42.
[1] HU Yang-ming, YUAN Yu-jia. Are Children Willing to Pay for Their Parents’ Smart Eldercare? —An Analysis Based on the Inter-generational Support Theory and the Theory of Planned Behaviour [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(5): 34-51.
[2] WANG Hai-yang, SHANG Jing. Professional Development of Social Work in Primary-level Social Governance Scenarios —An Analytical Framework Based on “Subjectivity and Synergy” [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(5): 52-65.
[3] GUAN Bin, ZHANG Yu. Hierarchy or Autonomy: Task Specialization, Governance Context, and Autonomous Organization Operating Mechanism [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(5): 32-44.
[4] WEI Sen, SU Ying-xue. Inner Logic of Clan Governance Drawn from the Changes of the Taxation and Corvee System in the Ming and Qing Dynasties (1368—1912) [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(3): 131-144.
[5] XIONG Yi-han, CAO Yi-ran. Spatial Redistribution: The Political Significance of the Governance of Rural-Urban Fringe Zone [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(1): 54-66.
[6] ZHU Hong-can, WANG Xin-bo. “Blockchain+People’s Livelihood”: Connotation, Situation and Mission [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(1): 76-86.
[7] TANG Chong-zhen,HE Ya-fei. Housing Burden and Fertility Desire: Positive Incentive or Resource Extrusion [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(4): 61-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!