Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (6): 57-66.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2025.06.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Tension Consequences and Practical Deviations of Farmer Organization in China’s Rural Revitalization: A Theoretical Perspective Based on the Organizational Layering Model

LU Su-wen1, WEN Jun2   

  1. 1. Couege of Philosophy, Law & Political Science, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China;
    2. School of Social Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
  • Received:2024-03-01 Online:2025-11-05 Published:2025-12-09

Abstract: The complexity, diversity, and dynamism of contradictions generate tensions that bring a series of unexpected consequences to organizations, revealing the intricate nature of organizational operations. Existing studies on the consequences of tensions in farmers’ organizations often treat organizations as unified and homogeneous structures, overlooking the interaction mechanisms across different levels, such as the external institutional environment and internal actors. Drawing on the theoretical perspective of the organizational hierarchical model and grounded in the practical context of farmers’ organization in China, this paper categorizes the consequences of tensions into three dimensions: density, sustainability, and institutional environment.The study finds that the consequences of organizational tensions among farmers exhibit multiple contradictions, including “over-density versus under-density,” “sustainability versus temporality,” and “convergence versus diversity.” Specifically, organizations demonstrate high input density but low output density, rapid growth in quantity but insufficient improvement in quality. Farmers’ participation in organizational activities and benefit acquisition processes show both sustainable and time-specific characteristics. Moreover, organizational functions and structures tend to converge, while organizational types and outcomes display diversified deviations.The findings suggest that tensions should be recognized as inherent attributes of organizational processes. On this basis, farmers’organizations need to strengthen their capacity to accommodate and adapt to the consequences of such tensions, thereby achieving dynamic balance and sustainable development.

Key words: rural revitalization, farmer organization, organizational layering model, tension consequences, practical deviation

CLC Number:  D422.6
[1] Smith W K,Lewis M W.Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing[J].Academy of Management Review,2011,36(2):81-403.
[2] Lewis M W. Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide[J]. Academy of Management Review,2000,25(4):760-776.
[3] [美]埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆.公共事物的治理之道——集体行动制度的演进[M].余逊达,陈旭东,译.上海:上海三联书店,2000.
[4] [美]曼瑟·奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑:公共物品与集团理论[M].陈郁,郭宇峰,李崇新,译.上海:格致出版社,2018.
[5] 崔月琴,母艳春.双重制度逻辑下公益组织的行动策略与发展张力——基于S公益组织与政府合作的实践分析[J].浙江社会科学,2021(12):68-76,157.
[6] [美]杰弗里·菲佛,杰勒尔德·R.萨兰基克.组织的外部控制:对组织资源依赖的分析[M].闫蕊,译.北京:东方出版社,2006.
[7] 朱乾宇,罗兴,马九杰.组织成本、专有性资源与农村资金互助社发起人控制[J].中国农村经济,2015(12):49-62.
[8] [美]罗恩·阿什肯纳斯,戴维·尤里奇,托德·吉克,等.无边界组织[M].姜文波,刘丽君,康毛军,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2015.
[9] 贺雪峰.农民组织化与再造村社集体[J].开放时代,2019(3):186-196.
[10] 焦存朝.基于主体视角的农民权益保护问题的思考[J].农业经济,2010(1):51-53.
[11] 张树旺,陈诗慧,杨秋婷.论乡村振兴背景下农民组织化的机制——基于下围村五年的纵向调查[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020(5):60-71.
[12] 吴越菲.乡村振兴背景下农村社区组织化的内在张力及其消解[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022(5):52-61.
[13] [美]W.理查德·斯科特,杰拉尔德·F.戴维斯.组织理论:理性、自然与开放系统的视角[M].高俊山,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.
[14] 陈家建,洪君宝.社会治理的话语与地方实践:基于“模糊政策”的概念解释[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024(1):11-20.
[15] 任永昌,郭晓鸣,丁延武.当前农民专业合作社支持政策存在的问题及对策建议——基于四川省的调查分析[J].农村经济,2012(5):7-10.
[16] 潘璐,戴小燕.发展新型农村集体经济的基层困境与现实悖论[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023(2):39-54.
[17] 周雪光.基层政府间的“共谋现象”——一个政府行为的制度逻辑[J].社会学研究,2008(6):1-21,243.
[18] 徐宗阳.农民行动的观念基础——以一个公司型农场的作物失窃事件为例[J].社会学研究,2022(3):182-205,230.
[19] 程士强.制度移植何以失败?——以陆村小额信贷组织移植“格莱珉”模式为例[J].社会学研究,2018(4):84-108,243-244.
[20] 熊万胜.合作社:作为制度化进程的意外后果[J].社会学研究,2009(5):83-109,244.
[21] 汪杰贵.论我国农民自组织“内卷化”危机与出路[J].农村经济,2014(11):7-12.
[22] Desmarais A A. The power of peasants: reflections on the meanings of La Vía Campesina[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2008,24(2):138-149.
[23] 马良灿.农村社区内生性组织及其“内卷化”问题探究[J].中国农村观察,2012(6):12-21,92.
[24] [美]齐格蒙特·鲍曼.流动的现代性[M].欧阳景根,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018.
[25] 文军,卢素文.复合文化网络:乡村振兴中主体的内生实践逻辑——基于云南多民族文化集居区的经验研究[J].贵州社会科学,2023(8):136-144.
[26] 袁方成,李思航.技术治理的风险及其演化逻辑——以农村精准扶贫为分析对象[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(2):45-61.
[27] 周雪光.组织社会学十讲[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003.
[28] 廖祖君,郭晓鸣.中国农业经营组织体系演变的逻辑与方向:一个产业链整合的分析框架[J].中国农村经济,2015(2):13-21.
[29] 邓衡山,王文烂.合作社的本质规定与现实检视——中国到底有没有真正的农民合作社?[J].中国农村经济,2014(7):15-26,38.
[30] Roy A.Peasant struggles in Mali: from defending cotton producers’interests to becoming part of the Malian power structures[J].Review of African Political Economy,2010,37(125):299-314.
[31] 李世杰,刘琼,高健.关系嵌入、利益联盟与“公司+农户”的组织制度变迁——基于海源公司的案例分析[J].中国农村经济,2018(2):33-48.
[32] [英]安东尼·吉登斯.社会的构成[M].李康,李猛,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998.
[33] DiMaggio P J, Powell W W.The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields[J].American Sociological 1983,23(2):143-166.
[34] 冯猛.目标权衡与过程控制:地方政府创新的行为逻辑[J].社会学研究,2020(2):124-145,244.
[35] 田凯,赵娟.组织趋同与多样性:组织分析新制度主义的发展脉络[J].经济社会体制比较,2017(3):172-180.
[36] [美]W.理查德·斯科特.制度与组织——思想观念、利益偏好与身份认同(第4版)[M].姚伟,等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2020.
[1] MA Jie, SONG Yi-ming. The Impact of Digital Literacy on Farmers’ Green Behaviors [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(3): 114-127.
[2] ZHANG Lin, WANG Long-ji, WANG Yan-xia. How Does the Use of Digital Finance Affect Farmers' Entrepreneurship: Micro Evidence Collected from 1 525 Households in Central and Western China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(2): 121-143.
[3] CHEN Gui-sheng, WU He-qing. The Logical Path and Promotion Mechanism of Empowering the Construction of a Strong Agriculture with New Quality Agricultural Productive Force [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 61(1): 46-57.
[4] WANG Wei-xin, WANG Chen-guang, YIN Xu-kang. Hometown Lost: Digital Economy Development, Employment Quality and Migrant Workers’ Willingness to Get Employed and Start Business in Hometown [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(6): 30-45.
[5] ZHANG Huai-cheng, HUANG Wen-sheng. The Realistic Demands and Practical Carriers of Rural Cultural Revitalization under the Perspective of Common Prosperity [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 60(5): 23-33.
[6] LÜ De-Wen. A New Pattern of Rural Governance towards Co-governance of Urban and Rural Areas——A Field Discovery Based on P County [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(6): 21-32.
[7] SHI Chuan-lin, WEN Yu. The Failure and Governance of Public Service in Suburban Villages in Mega-cities from the Perspective of Institutional Distance——Take D Village in Guangzhou as An Example [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(6): 33-44.
[8] TANG Bin, YANG Mei. Hub Disengaging: Behavioral Characteristics and Logical Attributions of Illegal Cases in Pilot Reform of Rural Policies [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(6): 45-60.
[9] LIU Zhi-peng. How Can Cross-regional Inter-governmental Cooperation Be Possible?—An Analysis of Food Safety Administration Based on Performance Target Difference [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(3): 28-39.
[10] Han Xi-ping. Marxist Theoretical Solutions to the Problems of Rural Development in China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 1-6.
[11] ZHANG Ke-jun, FU Zong-ping. Connection between Comprehensive Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization——An Analysis Based on the Duality of Policy Relations [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 56(6): 7-20.
[12] SUN Bang-jin,BIAN Chun-hui. The Research of the New Gentry in Contemporary China Rural Governance [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 55(6): 54-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 25 -30 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 67 -75 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 76 -80 .