Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (4): 110-123.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2023.04.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

What Kind of Public, and Whose Public? —A Focus on the Comparison of Huang Zongxi's and Locke's Fiscal Publicity Thoughts

LIU Shou-gang   

  1. School of Public Economics and Administration, Shanghai University of Fiance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2022-10-08 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-08-10

Abstract: The fiscal system is an extremely important national system as the fiscal aspect fully reflects the public nature of national system; such nature is shaped in a long process. By comparing Huang Zongxi's and Locke's thoughts on public finance, this paper concretely presents the development process and historical differences of the public finance system in China and the West in the 17th century, focusing on the following four aspects: the nature of fiscal power, the source of property rights, the control of tax collection, and the leader of fiscal management. The paper finds, 1) as Huang Zongxi's thought does not distinguish the political society and the government through two contractual processes, Locke's contribution, the publicity he advocates is difficult to be implemented,and it, expected by Huang, relies on the engagement of future “emperors” to pave the way; 2) without a solid property right theory, Huang just emphasizes the constraint of fiscal power with objective low quota; 3) the proposition that schools composed of intellectual elites play a deliberative role in fiscal management falls into no results. Instead, Locke's thought, based on the perfect social contract theory, distinguishes the political society and the government, thus highlighting the publicity and creatively developing a solid property right theory emphasizing that the parliament composed of economic elites determines the tax amount through public deliberation to restrict the collection power. The difference between Huang's and Locke's thoughts, to a large extent, does not lies in their thinking ability, but the different stages of national development. As Huang's thought mainly summarizes the traditional fiscal thought of imperial China, his some ideas for the future could not develop too much. Locke's thought, thought with some shadow of the Western Middle Ages, more reflects the design of modern finance by then British thinkers who had already crossed the threshold of modern states. The gradual expansion of fiscal openness has been reflected in the historical development of China and the United Kingdom.

Key words: Huang Zongxi, Locke, fiscal thought, publicity

CLC Number:  F091.3
[1] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[2] [法]让·雅克·卢梭.社会契约论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1980.
[3] [美]玛格丽特·利瓦伊.统治与岁入[M].周军华,译.上海:格致出版社,上海人民出版社,2010.
[4] [英]约翰·洛克.论降低利息和提高货币价值的后果[M].徐式谷,译.北京:商务印书馆,1962.
[5] [英]大卫·休谟.休谟政治论文选[M].张若衡,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010.
[6] [加]C. B. 麦克弗森.占有性个人主义的政治理论:从霍布斯到洛克[M].张传玺,译.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2018.
[7] [意]加塔诺·莫斯卡.统治阶级(《政治科学原理》)[M].贾鹤鹏,译.南京:译林出版社,2002.
[8] 刘守刚.打开现代:国家转型的财政政治[M].上海:上海远东出版社,2021.
[9] 彭慕兰.大分流——欧洲、中国及现代世界经济的发展[M].史建云,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2003.
[10] 邹进文.民国财政思想史[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2008.
[1] DUAN Yuan-xiu. Rationality, Belief and Agreement: Evaluation and Analysis on Locke’s Consensus Theory [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 51(4): 28-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] CHEN Xin-xia. The Philosophical Foundation of Marxist Theory on Human Development[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 1 -8 .
[2] PANG Jin-you, CHEN Meng-xue. Intelligent Entry and the Dilemma of Democracy: Risks and Challenges of Democratic Politics in the Age of Artificial Intelligence[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 9 -20 .
[3] DI Jin-hua, HUANG Qian. Regional Hierarchy and Expansion of Incentive Space for Primary-level Officials —Reflections Based on Fieldwork in Xiangxian County[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 21 -33 .
[4] WEI Cheng-Lin. Street Bureaucrats and Resilient City Building: The Perspective of Mass Work[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 34 -45 .
[5] DAI Yi-yuan, LI Zhen-zhen. Will the Improvement of Artificial Intelligence Literacy Bring About More Concerns for Personal Information Privacy? —A Research on Mesomeric Effect Based on Protection Consciousness and Technology Trust[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 46 -57 .
[6] YU Wei, SU Ling-min. Learning to Learn: An Essential Perspective on the Transformation of Learning Methods in the Era of Intelligence[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 58 -67 .
[7] XU Feng-hua, HU Xian-jin. Artificial Intelligence Enabling Personalized Learning: Implications, Mechanisms and Pathways[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 68 -79 .
[8] WANG Xiao-gang, GE Hai-shan. Research on the Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on the Income Gap between Urban and Rural Areas —An Analysis of Influencing Factors Based on Panel Change Point Model[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 80 -96 .
[9] YANG Zhi-yuan, XU Hao. Global Value Chain Position, Labor Skill Difference and Labor Income Gap[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 97 -109 .
[10] YUAN Fang-cheng1, WEI Yu-xin2. The More Radical, the More Conservative: Technological Regulation of Society and Its Redemption[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 124 -135 .