Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (5): 45-56.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2023.05.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Primary-level Administration in Vertical Governance Structure: Structural Collapse, Action Splitting, and Coordinated Approaches

DONG Wei-wei, QIN Yin   

  1. School of Public Administration, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
  • Received:2023-05-01 Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-10-08

Abstract: An exploration of the issue of execution can easily avoid its structural roots within the national governance system. Instead, it always focuses on the street bureaucrats at the end of national governance. An analysis of the elements of vertical governance structure and street bureaucratic action, and a further examination of the arrangement and combination of these elements, reveal that the systematic environment of street bureaucratic action bears dual dimensions of administration and politics, a vertical structure that constantly collapses towards the primary-level, accompanied by the relative decline of primary-level administrative organizations. The conflicts in the dimensions of identity, execution, and responsibility within the structure lead to the fragmentation of street bureaucratic actions in the context, resulting in the dilemma of politics wrapping administration, administration replacing politics, administration squeezing out governance, and governance relying on administration. To reposition the primary-level administration in the vertical structure and coordinate actions and structures, it is necessary to clarify the relationship between formal and semi-formal administrations, clarify the political system logic of functional allocation between levels, and cultivate the social governance foundation of national fundamental power. This truly provides solid structural conditions and institutionalized guarantees for street bureaucratic actions to meet the expectations of superiors and respond to social needs.

Key words: primary-level administration, vertical governance, street bureaucrats, policy implementation, front-line administrative personnel

CLC Number:  D63
[1] [英]迈克尔·曼. 国家的自主权:起源、机制与结果[M]//郭忠华,郭台辉.当代国家理论:基础与前沿.广州:广东人民出版社,2017.
[2] 胡萧力,王锡锌.基础性权力与“纵向治理结构”的优化[J].社会科学文摘,2016(4):43-44.
[3] 张贤明,张力伟.国家纵向治理体系现代化:结构、过程与功能[J].政治学研究,2021(6):63-74,176.
[4] 董伟玮.国家治理现代化的基层行政基础[J].理论探讨,2020(2):19-25.
[5] 周黎安.行政发包制[J].社会,2014(6):1-38.
[6] 周雪光.运动型治理机制:中国国家治理的制度逻辑再思考[J].开放时代,2012(9):105-125.
[7] 黄宗智.集权的简约治理——中国以准官员和纠纷解决为主的半正式基层行政[J].开放时代,2008(2):10-29.
[8] 颜昌武.刚性约束与自主性扩张——乡镇政府编外用工的一个解释性框架[J].中国行政管理,2019(4):100-106.
[9] [英]迈克尔·希尔. 理解社会政策[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[10] [美]珍妮特·登哈特,罗伯特·登哈特.新公共服务:服务而不是掌舵(第三版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016.
[11] [英]希尔,[荷]休普. 执行公共政策[M].北京:商务印书馆,2011.
[12] Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public service [M]. NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 2010.
[13] 董伟玮,李靖.街头官僚概念的中国适用性:对中国街头官僚概念内涵和外延的探讨[J].云南社会科学,2017(1):26-33.
[14] Maynard-Moody S, Musheno M. Cops, teachers, counsellors: narratives of street-level judgment [M]. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press,2003.
[15] 韩志明.街头官僚的空间阐释——基于工作界面的比较分析[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(4):583-591.
[16] Hupe P, Hill M. The three action levels of governance: re-framing the policy process beyond the stages model[C]//Peters BG, Pierre J. Handbook of public policy. London: SAGE, 2006.
[17] Meier K J, O’Toole L J, Sean N. Multilevel governance and organizational performance: investigating the political-bureaucratic labyrinth [J]. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 2004, 23(1):31-47.
[18] 周雪光,练宏.中国政府的治理模式:一个“控制权”理论[J].社会学研究,2012(5):69-93,243.
[19] Loyens K, Maesschalck J. Toward a theoretical framework for ethical decision making of street-level bureaucracy: existing models reconsidered[J]. Administration & Society, 2010, 42(1):66-100.
[20] 封丽霞.国家治理转型的纵向维度——基于央地关系改革的法治化视角[J].东方法学,2020(2):54-64.
[21] 汪锦军.纵向政府权力结构与社会治理:中国“政府与社会”关系的一个分析路径[J].浙江社会科学,2014(9):128-139.
[22] 苏曦凌,黄婷.国家与社会的互动界面:行动语境中的基层概念及其理解[J].行政论坛,2022(2):25-31.
[23] Brodkin E. Street-level organizations and the welfare state[M]// Brodkin E, Marston G. Street-level organizations and workfare politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press,2013.
[24] 吕芳.中国地方政府的“影子雇员”与“同心圆”结构——基于街道办事处的实证分析[J].管理世界,2015(10):106-116.
[25] 魏姝.干部制组织还是科层制组织——一个基于身份理论的“原教旨”分析[J].南京社会科学,2018(1):69-76,118.
[26] Zacka B. When the state meets the street: public service and moral agency. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2017.
[27] [美]林德布洛姆. 政治与市场[M]. 上海:上海三联书店,1992.
[28] [美]巴纳德.经理人员的职能[M]. 北京:机械工业出版社,2021.
[29] 董伟玮.建立一种街头官僚的政治理论:主题演进、概念愿景与理论整合[J].云南社会科学,2018(6):37-46,187.
[30] Harmon M. Public administration’s final exam: a pragmatist restructuring of the profession and the discipline[M].Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press, 2006.
[31] Harmon M .Action theory for public administration[M].New York: Longman,1981.
[32] 丁煌. 西方行政学说史(第三版)[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2017.
[33] [美]白瑞德.爪牙:清代县衙的书吏与差役[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2021.
[34] 魏程琳.职业化:半正式行政人员治理体系的重塑——基于城管部门调研[J].东吴学术,2021(4):46-54.
[35] 殷冬水,赵德昊.基础性权力:现代国家的标识——国家基础性权力的政治理论透视与解释[J].学习与探索,2019(9):81-88,192.
[1] WEI Cheng-Lin. Street Bureaucrats and Resilient City Building: The Perspective of Mass Work [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 34-45.
[2] HUANG Juan, TANG Yin-bin. Complex Situations and Multiple Responses: Action Logic of Policy Executors at the Primary Level —Based on the Case of Implementation of Targeted Poverty Alleviation Policy in X Town, Sichuan Province [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 58(6): 55-68.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] REN Jian-tao. The Capital of “Others”: “Chinese path to modernization” from a Comparative Perspective[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(3): 1 -15 .
[2] CHEN Xin-xia. The Philosophical Foundation of Marxist Theory on Human Development[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 1 -8 .
[3] PANG Jin-you, CHEN Meng-xue. Intelligent Entry and the Dilemma of Democracy: Risks and Challenges of Democratic Politics in the Age of Artificial Intelligence[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 9 -20 .
[4] DI Jin-hua, HUANG Qian. Regional Hierarchy and Expansion of Incentive Space for Primary-level Officials —Reflections Based on Fieldwork in Xiangxian County[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 21 -33 .
[5] WEI Cheng-Lin. Street Bureaucrats and Resilient City Building: The Perspective of Mass Work[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 34 -45 .
[6] DAI Yi-yuan, LI Zhen-zhen. Will the Improvement of Artificial Intelligence Literacy Bring About More Concerns for Personal Information Privacy? —A Research on Mesomeric Effect Based on Protection Consciousness and Technology Trust[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 46 -57 .
[7] YU Wei, SU Ling-min. Learning to Learn: An Essential Perspective on the Transformation of Learning Methods in the Era of Intelligence[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 58 -67 .
[8] XU Feng-hua, HU Xian-jin. Artificial Intelligence Enabling Personalized Learning: Implications, Mechanisms and Pathways[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 68 -79 .
[9] WANG Xiao-gang, GE Hai-shan. Research on the Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on the Income Gap between Urban and Rural Areas —An Analysis of Influencing Factors Based on Panel Change Point Model[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 80 -96 .
[10] YANG Zhi-yuan, XU Hao. Global Value Chain Position, Labor Skill Difference and Labor Income Gap[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 97 -109 .