Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (2): 103-120.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2025.02.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Local Market Size, Siphon Effect, and Global Value Chain Climb

DU Yun-su1, ZHOU Yu-run2   

  1. 1. College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
    2. School of International Economics and Business, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Received:2024-02-19 Online:2025-03-05 Published:2025-02-26

Abstract: Against an open economy, the expansion of the local market bears a strong siphon effect and is thus an important way for a country to climb the global value chain. This paper divides the local market size in terms of intermediate input and final demand, and employs national panel data to study the impact of advantages that local market size enjoys and their siphon effects on global value chain upgrading. The results show that the expansion of local market size has a significant promoting effect on global value chain upgrading, and it has withstood the robustness and endogeneity tests; further heterogeneity analysis reveals that the global value chain enhancement effect produced by expanding local market size is more significant in developed countries, countries with high institutional quality, advanced product demand structures, and large household final consumption markets. In addition, siphoning international capital and innovation factors is the main channel through which the expansion of local market size affects the global value chain position, and the siphoning effect of local market size on capital is more significant in countries with a high proportion of technology intensive product demand, while its siphoning effect on innovation factors only exists significantly in countries with larger local market sizes. The research conclusion provides a reference for China to leverage its advantages in the super large market and promote “Made in China” to move towards the high-end of the global value chain.

Key words: local market size, intermediate product demand, final demand, siphon effect, global value chain

CLC Number:  F114
[1] Havranek T,Irsova Z. Estimating vertical spillovers from FDI: why results vary and what the true effect is[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2011, 85(2): 234-244.
[2] 邵朝对,苏丹妮.国内价值链与技术差距——来自中国省际的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2019(6):98-116.
[3] 郑江淮,郑玉.新兴经济大国中间产品创新驱动全球价值链攀升——基于中国经验的解释[J].中国工业经济,2020(5) : 61-79.
[4] 杨继军,金梦圆.数字化转型与企业出口产品范围调整[J].国际商务研究,2023(3):15-27.
[5] 钱学锋,黄云湖.中国制造业本地市场效应再估计:基于多国模型框架的分析[J].世界经济,2013(6):59-78.
[6] 吕越,盛斌,吕云龙.中国的市场分割会导致企业出口国内附加值率下降吗[J].中国工业经济,2018(5):5-23.
[7] 黄先海,张胜利.中国战略性新兴产业的发展路径选择:大国市场诱致[J].中国工业经济,2019(11):60-78.
[8] 韩峰,庄宗武,李丹.国内大市场优势推动了中国制造业出口价值攀升吗?[J].财经研究,2020(10):4-18.
[9] 蒋为,周荃,干铠骏.国内市场规模扩张的方言壁垒及其出口效应——基于本地市场效应的视角[J].财经研究,2019(5):125-138.
[10] Chaney T, Ossa R. Market size, division of labor, and firm productivity[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2013, 90(1): 177-180.
[11] 马丹,何雅兴,张婧怡.技术差距、中间产品内向化与出口国内增加值份额变动[J].中国工业经济,2019(9): 117-135.
[12] 张昊.居民消费扩张与统一市场形成——“本土市场效应”的国内情形[J].财贸经济,2020(6):144-160.
[13] Xu Bin, Lu Jiangyong. Foreign direct investment, processing trade, and the sophistication of China's exports[J]. China economic Review, 2009, 20(3): 425-439.
[14] Wang J Y, Blomstrom M. Foreign investment and technology transfer: a simple model[R]. NBER Working Papers, 1992, 36(1): 137-155.
[15] 陈强远,钱则一,陈羽,等.FDI对东道国企业的生存促进效应——兼议产业安全与外资市场准入[J].中国工业经济,2021(7):137-155.
[16] 毛其淋.外资进入自由化如何影响了中国本土企业创新?[J].金融研究,2019(1):72-90.
[17] 曲如晓,刘霞.外国在华专利申请的技术外溢效应研究[J].世界经济,2019(11):124-147.
[18] 江小涓,孟丽君.内循环为主、外循环赋能与更高水平双循环——国际经验与中国实践[J].管理世界,2021(1):1-19.
[19] 钱进,王庭东.“一带一路”倡议、东道国制度与中国的对外直接投资——基于动态面板数据GMM的经验考量[J].国际贸易问题,2019(3):101-114.
[20] 谢小平,傅元海.大国市场优势、消费结构升级与出口商品结构高级化[J].广东财经大学学报,2018(4):27-37.
[21] 王妍,王雅莉.“十四五”期间我国消费需求趋势及对总产品结构的影响[J].统计与决策,2021(11):125-129.
[22] 王永进,盛丹,施炳展,等.基础设施如何提升了出口技术复杂度?[J].经济研究,2010(7):103-115.
[23] Hausmann R, Hwang J, Rodrik D. What you export matters[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2007, 12(1): 1-25.
[24] Weder R. Comparative home-market advantage: an empirical analysis of British and American export[J]. Review of World Economics, 2003, 139(2): 220-247.
[25] 毛艳华,李敬子.中国服务业出口的本地市场效应研究[J].经济研究,2015(8):98-113.
[26] 戴利研,李震.双边政治关系、制度质量与中国对外直接投资[J].经济理论与经济管理,2018(11):94-109.
[27] 易先忠,包群,高凌云,等.出口与内需的结构背离:成因及影响[J].经济研究,2017(7):79-93.
[28] 陈丰龙,徐康宁.本土市场规模与中国制造业全要素生产率[J].中国工业经济,2012(5):44-56.
[29] 杨先明,马娜.本土市场规模、市场制度与国家间生产率差异:基于跨国数据的研究[J].财经科学,2018(6):53-67.
[30] Hering L, Poncet S. Market access impact on individual wages: evidence from China[R]. CEPII Working Paper, 2006.
[31] Nunn N, Qian N. U.S. food aid and civil conflict[J]. American Economic Review, 2014,104 (6): 1630-1666.
[32] 韩峰,庄宗武,阳立高.中国制造业出口价值攀升的空间动力来源——基于要素供给和市场需求的综合视角[J].中国工业经济,2021(3):61-79.
[33] Bai J, Barwick P, Cao S, et al. Quid pro quo, knowledge spillover and industrial quality upgrading[R]. NBER Working Paper No. 27644, 2020.
[34] 戴枫,吕笠瞻.全国统一大市场能否促进绿色技术创新的量质齐升?[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024(3):86-105.
[1] YANG Zhi-yuan, XU Hao. Global Value Chain Position, Labor Skill Difference and Labor Income Gap [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 59(4): 97-109.
[2] LI Xiao-ping, YANG Wei, XIAO Wei-chu. The Influence of Industrial Chain Agglomeration on the Upgrading of Value Chain ——A Study Based on the Panel Data (2005-2015) of 41 Countries along the Belt and Road [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 57(4): 97-113.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 11 -17 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 18 -24 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 31 -36 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 37 -41 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 42 -47 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 48 -54 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 61 -66 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 67 -75 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 54(3): 76 -80 .